A Sanity Clause for Xmas?

By

The £1m would also need VAT? (no laughing at the …

Comment on A Sanity Clause for Xmas? by tykebhoy.

The £1m would also need VAT? (no laughing at the back) and agents fees deducting would it not?

tykebhoy Also Commented

A Sanity Clause for Xmas?
@Kilgore Trout

Thanks so the market maker effectively earned a 0.5% commission of just under £12k with the “markup”


A Sanity Clause for Xmas?
@Cosmic Truth.

You may have already worked it out but until late this afternoon there was no proof that King’s trust had bought the shares RIFC were claiming it had. The proof comes in two parts, the actual share dealing transaction(s) which have now appeared on the LSE site (as EasyJambo posted just before you). This does not identify the purchaser, or the seller for that matter, but if a sale or purchase of shares takes the seller and/or buyer below and/or above certain thresholds then a for TR1 needs submitting by the seller and/or buyer. No TR1s have yet appeared and I think there is a 3 working day timelimit so its getting close.


A Sanity Clause for Xmas?

easyJambo says:
January 6, 2015 at 6:14 pm
7 0 Rate This

A series of delayed trades from 2nd have just come through. Looks like the buy and sell trades for Dave King who appears to have acquired the shares at 20.1p

02-Jan-15 13:05:24 20.10 11,869,505 Sell* 23.00 27.00 2.386M
02-Jan-15 13:04:18 20.00 8,109,223 Sell* 23.00 27.00 1.622M
02-Jan-15 13:03:24 20.00 3,260,282 Sell* 23.00 27.00 652.06k
02-Jan-15 13:03:16 20.00 500,000 Sell* 23.00 27.00 100.00k

I’m assuming that’s from the unofficial LSE site as opposed to the official one. The official one isn’t showing them and doesn’t have the ability to show Friday’s delayed trades. There appears to be an echo. All 4 are marked sell and the last 3 add up to the same share number though (because of the 0.1p price difference) not the same value. Is it a blip in the LSE reporting ?


Recent Comments by tykebhoy

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
On the companies house share allotment document.  Although it doesn’t state “working days” shirley any processing is manual and therefore the 5 days exclude today, yesterday and possibly Friday?  That would also rule out tomorrow and Tuesday from the count.

On the JP Jenkins page re RIFC.  I am pretty certain that the 50,000 trade is earlier than October and is the most recent.  Regardless I don’t think the recent trades changed in October and definitely haven’t in November and December.  It should be noted though that JP Jenkins will only likely report trades done through them where buyer and seller are originally unaware of each other.  Private purchases/trades can happen without going through JP Jenkins if the purchaser knows independently the seller wants rid.  The MASH/Mike Ashley sale to Barry Scott/Club 2012 did not appear on there allegedly because the sale price was inflated as part of the deal to renegotiate the retail deal.  Any purchase of shares by AJ from DCK or any other board member would similarly avoid the need of the middleman JP Jenkins. 


Small Price to Pay?
The SFA “get out” is the claim they have no jurisdiction over the chair of a PLC that just happens to own a football club.  I think the English FA can teach them a thing or two about that.  Birmingham. Leeds and Blackburn being recent examples.  


Small Price to Pay?
It looks like Nottingham Forest may start rethinkinking their interim appointment 07

FWIW My take on last night’s statement is rhat it was pulished by someone known to have had prior access to the website.  As PMGB might say “Peace be upon him”.  I can’t believe the CEO had any part in it and for that reason I suspect we may see a real resignation soon which may also be joined by 2 of the 3 bears.  This has all the hallmarks of a “Glib” production with Gilligan and Murray minor riding shotgun.  There may be some High Level obsfucation in attempted damage limitation but I think the damage is now well and truly done.  Not even a RRM would give up current gainful employment to pick up the poisoned chalice.


Good Try Mr. McKenzie
Jimbo 19:36

I’m with Cluster One’s response on the Radar asking serious questions.

I think you are correct Zadok is only heard from the group stages.

I don’t think it is only Miller but Wallace himself who will be retired long before, if ever,  an entity playing out of Ibrox will be anywhere near CL Group stages or even qualifiers.


The Day I was on the Scotland U-23 Bench
JusticesLord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge
Hearing start date15 Mar 2017
Hearing finish date16 Mar 2017
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0073.html


About the author