An Honest Game? Convince Us.

Avatar By

Brenda says: April 1, 2014 at 7:32 pm Does anyone …

Comment on An Honest Game? Convince Us. by Angus1983.

Brenda says:
April 1, 2014 at 7:32 pm

Does anyone get the feeling VL cherry picks what misdemeanors he ‘deals’ with, let’s face it what Leigh did was a bit naughty but there have been many, many other cases (cont. p94)
Aye, whataboutery Mr Lennon’s suspended sentence for incursions into the playing area which was not revisited following his leaping about on the pitch at Pittodrie recently? 😉

Griffiths is a silly boy, and needs to teach himself that playing for one of the OF (yes, yes, I know, but it’s so convenient) brings far greater scrutiny and responsibility. He cannot have a private life in public whilst in the role of a Celtic player. He was saying as much himself in recent interviews, in which he promised he’d wised up.

Anyway. Very impressed with the correspondence from TSFM reproduced above. Well done.

Angus1983 Also Commented

An Honest Game? Convince Us.
Exiled Celt says:
April 6, 2014 at 1:31 am

“But the 49-year-old has no plans to offload Newcastle – bad news for Toon fans who are desperate to see the back of him.”

Brings to mind a previous “saviour” who had previous involvement with an English team.

Sheffield Utd fans were not enamoured with that particular gentleman, yet their warnings went unheeded.

An Honest Game? Convince Us.
woodstein says:
April 5, 2014 at 1:42 pm

… If his employer could show from course attendance records that they were taking health and safety seriously, then in the event of an accident or injury, their Insurers would pay out under their Employers Liability Policy.

Perhaps I could have been a bit clearer. I understand the requirement for such policies. What I meant was that the policies are not taken seriously (if read at all) by the average employee. Attendance at training courses at which one learns how to wire a plug, lift a box, clip oneself onto a safety line in order to climb onto a 6 foot high fuel tank, wear a lifejacket when working near a river, etc, may be a necessity but does not generally change the working practices of said employee.

It does, however, allow the company to not pay compensation when a fellow, due to staff cutbacks, is out working alone when he should be in a pair, isn’t wearing his lifejacket according to the risk assessment … slips, bangs his head and drowns in a ditch.

Sorry, way off topic. 🙂

An Honest Game? Convince Us.
Caveat Emptor says:
April 4, 2014 at 6:42 pm

… How can an organisation (William Hill spring to mind) with a publicly stated policy on ethics and corporate social responsibility be part of this farrago and not question the activities (and motivations) of the organisation they are supporting financially?

Firstly, I may be inclined not to put forward a gambling company as a picture of social responsibility … but, that aside, I should imagine what a sponsor wants is for their name to keep coming up. With the controversy surrounding the Scottish Cup semis and final, I should imagine they’re rather delighted if anything.

(Publicly stated “policies” are another invention related to modern business, and should be treated with the same contempt as business-speak. Usually they’re only there so that a company can put them towards an ISO rating. In practice they mean very little, much like your average Risk Assessment – whoever thought up the majority of Health & Safety at Work deserves a medal for keeping so many people in overpaid nonsense work.)

Recent Comments by Angus1983

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HighlanderDecember 15, 2017 at 12:09
Come on, Highlander. Are you trying to tell us that JJ and The Mensch are *different people*? 🙂

Armageddon? What Armageddon?
Castofthousands says:
June 3, 2014 at 9:44 pm

For an effective claim to be made it should be forceful and expeditious.
Trite comment: Try telling that to many 1970s TV presenters.

Real comment: Evidence gathering can take a long time, particularly where co-operation is not forthcoming. Justice is operated by heavy, slow-moving wheels.

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
A little light relief from the lad Mohsni (unfortunately “not a big name like Spanish Archer McCulloch”), talking in the Daily Record:

I thought the poor fellow was simply a rubbish fitba player, but he appears to also be a marble or two short.

(P.S. Split infinitives, I love ’em. Use them whenever I can – it’s a nonsensical “rule” of grammar. 🙂 )

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
Finloch says:
April 18, 2014 at 2:07 pm

You write more like a Sandender

🙂 Surely you mean a Saniner? I spent many a happy summer day at Sanine beach, having walked over the hill fae Portsoy. Brilliant gun emplacement and tank traps. There was a great summer cafe in the old Church hall (I think it was) with a juke box and everything!

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
Upthehoops – I’m afraid that you may be taking a Glasgow-centric view there. I have a couple of excellent Irish friends here in Aberdeenshire. The only problem at all people here have with anyone of Irish descent is, dare I say it, when they’re part of the travelling community.

Danish – I also grew up in the East End. The East End of Portsoy. I assume that’s where you meant? 😉

About the author