An Honest Game? Convince Us.

Avatar By

Another excellent piece of correspondence. Hopefully it will receive the …

Comment on An Honest Game? Convince Us. by nawlite.

Another excellent piece of correspondence. Hopefully it will receive the reply it deserves.

nawlite Also Commented

An Honest Game? Convince Us.
Ernie, I was going to cut and paste the Leeds thing from the BBC website, but you beat me to it. What I can’t get is how these two paragraphs can make sense when viewed together…
“Cellino, who owns Serie A side Cagliari, was initially denied the opportunity to purchase Leeds by the Football League after being found guilty in March of not paying import duty on a yacht in Italy.” and
“The independent QC has concluded that Mr Cellino’s recent conviction in the Sardinian court did not involve conduct that would “reasonably be considered to be dishonest” based on information available to him at the current time.” So he’s found guilty of avoiding tax, but can’t be considered dishonest?!?!
To be fair to the Football League it looks as if they were trying to do (what, from my limited knowledge of the case, is) the right thing, but an independent QC has decided Cellino IS a fit and proper person, despite the guilty verdict. I really don’t get it.


Recent Comments by nawlite

Enough is enough
EB, you state that the SFA’s rules allowed them discretion to transfer the membership. Just for clarity – is your reason for doing so purely to clarify for others on here that the SFA did not break their rules in allowing the transfer? I.e. a warning not to claim the SFA breached their rules?
Or is your reason for stating it an argument that the transfer of membership allows the current ‘Rangers’ to claim that it is the same entity as the ‘Rangers’ currently in liquidation?


Enough is enough
AS, you need to remember that as far as the SFA is concerned there’s no uncertainty ‘cos Dave said he would put the money in! So that’s awrite then.


Enough is enough
If Dorrans’ signing was after the accounts cut-off, then I can only see Cardoso, Pena, Herrera, Candeias and Morelos signing for a fee according to TransferMarket. Their fees listed there total only £7,380m not the c£10m shown in the accounts. Anyone any ideas?


Enough is enough
Given that Dave doesn’t have any control, I’m wondering who the nice person at NOAL is who keeps sending TRFC money out of the goodness of his heart?!?


Enough is enough
Tris, you say “Celtic wouldn’t be risking very much if some more equitable model was introducedThey’d still have more money than most.”
Of course they would………but only most in Scotland. That’s my point – why would they weaken themselves against the ‘big’ European clubs whom they have ambitions to better or at least compete with? You suggest they should because somewhere down the line they MIGHT need to improve due to increased competition from better domestic clubs. Seriously? “Let’s weaken ourselves against the clubs we’re aspiring to match in the hope that years ahead we MIGHT get better and they (keeping all their money) don’t”!?!?!?!
Let’s be realistic. You can’t expect a business/club to do that.
I want better competition and improving standards in Scottish football as much as anyone, but the more naïve comments I hear, the more I’m convinced that it can only be done by somehow forcing UEFA to drive it from the top down (or, as you say, the bubble bursts and we start from scratch).


About the author

Avatar