Beware the angry Shareholders — they might just demand an answer!

Avatar By

Just a wee thing I was wondering about Am I …

Comment on Beware the angry Shareholders — they might just demand an answer! by fergusslayedtheblues.

Just a wee thing I was wondering about
Am I correct in thinking that CW has secured the rights to the ragers story (books,tv,film ) ,bearing in mind his love of tape recorders ,could this be CWs insurance policy .
Just think how many peepil CW will have by the Sandy Galls if he had his tape running from the start of this debacle .
None more so possibly than two peepil from the 6th floor over dinner in Oct 2011 ,CWs film ,book ,tv doc could be worth plenty if he released any but also ,how much could it be worth to certain peepil for CWs book.film.tv doc never to see the light of day.
If there has been any corruption going on (as many on here believe ) and CW has the means to prove just that ,would he be prepared to go public ,IMO he most certainly would .
The question is ,is it worth more to be buried than public
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

fergusslayedtheblues Also Commented

Beware the angry Shareholders — they might just demand an answer!
There is one thing that could sort the old club are the new club fantasy out quite easily .
Let SR come out publicly and state as fact that Ragers 1872 and Sevco 2012 are the SAME CLUB and show us all the proof .
Bearing in mind as to the lengths of rule bending ,rule breaking and just made up rules that the SFA concocted for their favourite pet ,anyone with half a brain cell would realise that if they were the same club then Regan would have summoned the whole of the only too eager MSM to the biggest venue (Sevco would even cancel a game to allow it at Ibrokes ) and prove all us bampots wrong .The only trouble would be that SR would never get near the microphone because CO would demand that he should be the one to tell the PEEPIL the great news .
Can any sevco 2012 fan explain why they have not done so ? 😯 😯


Beware the angry Shareholders — they might just demand an answer!
I am sorry but I disagree that the old club/new club argument is just a distraction ,IMO it’s fundamental to this whole charade .
It is of as much importance as the levels of rule bending,breaking (some say corruption ) in our game as a whole .
If as many believe ,that there was a plan hatched many years ago when the owner of the old club (pre Whyte ) must have realised that there was no way back and liquidation was the only option .
The death of the old club through mountainous debts ,sold off revenue streams and tax evasion scandals led to the end of the club who benefited on the PARK from the monies received ,if it could have secured a CVA then the SMSM and it’s fans could have shouted from the rooftops and demanded that everyone should refer and treat it as the old club.
The fact that the SFA planned to place any club who may have hatched such a plan to jettison it’s debts and responsibilities says everything about that organisation and is of as much importance but both subjects are a pivotal part of what a lot of us on here believe has gone on ,especially if it is proved the SFA were party to the scheme from the start .
The constant (boring) argument of old club / new club is not aimed at the new club fans ,IMO it is aimed at the SMSM and the PEEPIL in charge of our game ,it is our way of telling them WE know what they have been up to and will be watching what they do next .
Neepheid……
I was disappointed to read your decision to leave this blog as I always valued your input and took notice of all you posted but IMO the old club/new club argument would be unimportant if it was only between rival football supporters but on here I believe it is between all REAL SCOTTISH FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS AND THE SFA/SMSM.


Beware the angry Shareholders — they might just demand an answer!
HP
It’s wee diamonds like that post that makes reading this blog worth every up and down and divorce threat .
πŸ˜€


Recent Comments by fergusslayedtheblues

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
I think the comment made on the nightshift ,is a indicative of why so many people do not trust print journalism.
Incredible comment
I have not bought a paper in years and to be honest I don’t think anything they do will change that


Fans for Judicial Review – Counsel Opinion
AJ 
I even heard someone on BBC sportsound say ,that there wasn’t even a figure to speak to DM .(although M Bain seemed to find one ) 
Every single excuse to avoid having to admit they COULD not or DID not want to pay the going rate .
DM all but admitted that he was expected to walk out if he wanted to go to Ibrokes and he wasn’t prepared to do that .
I must admit to enjoying the SMSM tying themselves in knots trying to find an excuse to avoid the reality of it all 


Fans for Judicial Review – Counsel Opinion
with more and more sevco 2102 fans beginning to to turn their attention to the job the board is doing .
Watch out for a rallying rumour to the WATP merchants .
Could Level 1872 think that a throw back to a policy of the old club ,could limit the damage of their latest fiasco.
 


Who Is Conning Whom?
You have to laugh 
Now it;s DM didn’t fancy working with a DOF ,really did he not know sevco 2012 had a DOF 
For me sevco 2102 did not have the money to speak to DM and he was unwilling to quit 
Pure and simple 


Who Is Conning Whom?
MACFURGLYDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 21:08
That is the post of the night 
spot on 


About the author

Avatar