Commander Green, The FIFA man, and life after the Murray Empire

By

New post on the name of the ‘Ger :-) …

Comment on Commander Green, The FIFA man, and life after the Murray Empire by TSFM.

New post on the name of the ‘Ger πŸ™‚

TSFM Also Commented

Commander Green, The FIFA man, and life after the Murray Empire
To clear things up from last night, at least I hope I can clear things up;
Brenda, Observer and Althetim decided to inform us that they would not be posting any longer (temporarily or otherwise).

I had assumed that this was due to some of the foul abuse of JeanBrodie by davis58. Subsequently, Brenda did post again, but she could not see the comments she made. I have spoken to her via email and she is aware that she is not banned, and that her comments were posted.

Meanwhile, I was on moderation duty last night working to reduce the nonsense that was appearing courtesy of our friend davis58 whose posting privileges have been suspended, pending Jean’s reaction to his apology.
I was also watching the blog to reduce the gloating that went on after the Rangers result, and unfortunately, yet another poster refused to go along with my requests, and was subsequently suspended.

I would like to apologise to Jean for the slow reaction to the abusive excesses of davis58’s posts. Unfortunately, I was out at the time the worst of it happened. We have tried to give davis a bit of slack, and maybe he took advantage of that.

Hopefully we can get back to normal today – whatever normal is πŸ™‚


Commander Green, The FIFA man, and life after the Murray Empire
For information of all.

Davis58 has apologised to Jean Brodie for his behaviour today. I will forward the text of the message to Jean to see if she thinks the apology is adequate.


Commander Green, The FIFA man, and life after the Murray Empire
Observer says:

Sunday, October 7, 2012 at 01:38(Edit)

I have been subjected to the same subtle pressure as Althetim and Brenda, and I will also have to sadly pull out of posting here.

Good luck with the blog’s aims.
__________________________________________________________

Thanks O

For clarity, could you let us know what pressure you have been subjected to?


Recent Comments by TSFM

Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
bogsdollox says:

March 7, 2014 at 1:08 pm

Alan Price says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rangers were not the lender. The Sub-Trusts, into which Rangers made a contribution via an EBT, are the β€œlender”. Rangers gave the money away and there can be no suggestion of repayment to them.
__________________________________________________________________

Yes, but had the loans been repaid by the lendees, Rangers would have been able to apply for one themselves had they set up a sub-trust in their favour. Therefore the money would have been available to the club in times of hardship.

Or perhaps I am missing something here?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Auldheid
Res 12 is as you say important, but I am convinced that Celtic have no desire whatsoever to pursue its aims.
We could have a discussion about the possible reasons, but ultimately if DD is disinclined to seek a proper answer to these questions, then the SFA will dodge the bullet.
Thus my question to Campbellsmoney: do individual (or groups of) shareholders have locus to seek legal redress here?
Going at it in that fashion may even force Celtic and other clubs for that matter to come on board.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
I don’t know is the answer, but I doubt it. You see its not a question of law really. Its not a proper court – its a made up thing by a private body.
_________________________________________________________________

I meant a challenge in law. For example, is there a framework whereby a shareholder(s) of a club(s) could challenge the outcome?

It does seem rather odd that, if a most people here believe, RFC achieved honours dishonestly and in doing so denied other clubs prize-money and opportunity that those clubs are reluctant to seek redress.

My guess I that the must have something to lose by bringing that up – but what?

Is there a mechanism through which the SFA/SPL could be sued by individual shareholders for loss of earnings caused by a lack of proper regulation by the governing bodies.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Kicker Conspiracy

Double click or tap on the TU and it will change your vote πŸ™‚


About the author