Comment Moderation Thread

By

Ecobhoy says: March 21, 2015 at 10:20 am As to naming the …

Comment on Comment Moderation Thread by parttimearab.

ecobhoy says:
March 21, 2015 at 10:20 am

As to naming the individual Mod who has made a decision – well that’s simply not on IMO. I have no doubt that – even like referees – when they’ve made a dodgy decision that will be recognised internally and in turn the modding policy will reflect this development.
=====================================
Perhaps they get sent to moderate the OC/NC thread for a couple of weeks…. 😆

parttimearab Also Commented

Comment Moderation Thread
blu says:
June 11, 2014 at 10:46 pm
TSFM, I’m surprised at your response to ecobhoy’s pieces on the alleged corrupt land deals/state aid. Unlike the OCNC and TUPE discussions it does’t go round in circles.
————
Beat me to it 🙂


Comment Moderation Thread
TSFM says:
June 11, 2014 at 5:58 pm
————————–
I’m really not sure that Ecobhoy’s comments on the “land bears” activities need to be shunted to a separate thread – unlike the OCNC debate Eco’s comments haven’t generated the same circular arguments and, I think, have relevance to the on going discussions on this site and in truth have been infrequent, proportionate and at times have been responses to requests from others on this site.

I understand the thinking behind your suggestion but I don’t see Eco’s contribution in this matter to be a distraction or becoming one.
====================================================================ecobhoy says:
June 11, 2014 at 7:29 pm
I know when my contribution is no longer needed or desired.
————————————————————
If you don’t mind me saying, a wee bit of an overreaction there?

TSFM can doubtless speak for himself but I didn’t get the feeling that your contribution wasn’t wanted.


Recent Comments by parttimearab

Small Price to Pay?

NEEPHEIDFEBRUARY 26, 2017 at 12:40
JohnJames is stating as a fact that the Dundee Utd players have been told that they are going into administration on Monday. I really hope that he’s got this one badly wrong

How can I put this – complete and utter pish – like most of his output


The Day I was on the Scotland U-23 Bench

JIMBOJANUARY 6, 2017 at 16:01
‘The Rangers’   I’ve often wondered how Charles Green got away with such a miniscule change to the name.  As I understood it, under the phoenix laws any new business arising from the ashes had to have a significantly different name so that it could not be seen to go into liquidation, shed the debt and start again unharmed, name intact

IIRC (and it is a while ago now) permission was sought (by CG) from and granted by the liquidators BDO.
Perhaps someone else who kept notes or has a better memory than me might confirm this?


The Causes of Crime
The whole thing smacks of poetic justice you might say…

“Water, water, every where, And all the boards did shrink; Water, water, every where, Nor any drop to drink.” 
10


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
UPTHEHOOPS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 at 05:09
==========================
Wrt Ranger’s reported desire to see strict liability brought in.

The cynic would suppose that they know the other clubs are dead set against it so it makes them look good while they know it’s never gonnae happen…

Even if it turns out that Phil is correct and the Scottish government will insist they’d still look better than the others and if it’s inevitable they’ve nothing to loose.

TBH I’m struggling to understand how it could be tacked onto ground licencing without local authorities rather than the SFA becoming responsible for enforcement and sanctions which I truly doubt they’d want involved in.

Finally you’d hope they’d simply decided it was time to put a cork in the choir’s gob for their own benefit and that of football and Scottish society as a whole – well a man can dream, can’t he 09


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
WOTTPI
SEPTEMBER 28,  2016 at 18:13
==========================
I note that while the panel rejected the…error…over the designation of the club (cough) they suggested that the SFA might want to tighten up on that in future 12
Bit late 10 

I assume the charges against Rangers were dropped as the consideration of Hibs covered the same ground? 


About the author