Daft and Dafter

By

Folks, I understand the frustration some of you feel about …

Comment on Daft and Dafter by TSFM.

Folks, I understand the frustration some of you feel about the Celtic input here, however given the numbers involved, I think we have to be realistic in terms of our expectations.

There are four perspectives at play here;
1. the SFA/SPFL slant
2. the RFC/SEVCO slant
3. the sporting integrity slant
4. the “My Team” slant

Celtic fans constitute the single biggest group on the blog, so it is unavoidable that #4 above will weigh in favour of Celtic.

If people can’t accept that, then I think they are missing the big picture. The RFC scandal has had almost unanimous support from fans across the football spectrum. The Jack Irvine’s of this world desperately need to divide us. If we star bitching at each other, we would be more positively engaged by winding the whole thing up here.

Compromise is necessary, and I’m pretty sure that the Celtic constituency here will tell you that just as they are the largest group on the blog, they have been the most heavily moderated – and that will continue. Please trust us that we will not allow any single group to ride roughshod over others.

As for those who continually whine about TDs, PLEASE ignore them. We actually did a survey a couple of months ago which showed that TDs actually bear no relation whatsoever to the course of the debate.

And for those who whine about people disagreeing with them – this just isn’t the place for you.

TSFM Also Commented

Daft and Dafter
New blog up….. BRTH home from his hols!


Daft and Dafter
BRTH

Mailboxes empty 😕


Daft and Dafter
jean7brodie says:

July 23, 2013 at 9:17 pm
Am I going daft or senile, but did I see a post earlier on where ‘someone’ referred to Celtic supporters as ..

__________________________________________________

Yes they did. The matter has been deal with. Please do not feed the trolls.


Recent Comments by TSFM

Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
bogsdollox says:

March 7, 2014 at 1:08 pm

Alan Price says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rangers were not the lender. The Sub-Trusts, into which Rangers made a contribution via an EBT, are the “lender”. Rangers gave the money away and there can be no suggestion of repayment to them.
__________________________________________________________________

Yes, but had the loans been repaid by the lendees, Rangers would have been able to apply for one themselves had they set up a sub-trust in their favour. Therefore the money would have been available to the club in times of hardship.

Or perhaps I am missing something here?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Auldheid
Res 12 is as you say important, but I am convinced that Celtic have no desire whatsoever to pursue its aims.
We could have a discussion about the possible reasons, but ultimately if DD is disinclined to seek a proper answer to these questions, then the SFA will dodge the bullet.
Thus my question to Campbellsmoney: do individual (or groups of) shareholders have locus to seek legal redress here?
Going at it in that fashion may even force Celtic and other clubs for that matter to come on board.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
I don’t know is the answer, but I doubt it. You see its not a question of law really. Its not a proper court – its a made up thing by a private body.
_________________________________________________________________

I meant a challenge in law. For example, is there a framework whereby a shareholder(s) of a club(s) could challenge the outcome?

It does seem rather odd that, if a most people here believe, RFC achieved honours dishonestly and in doing so denied other clubs prize-money and opportunity that those clubs are reluctant to seek redress.

My guess I that the must have something to lose by bringing that up – but what?

Is there a mechanism through which the SFA/SPL could be sued by individual shareholders for loss of earnings caused by a lack of proper regulation by the governing bodies.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Kicker Conspiracy

Double click or tap on the TU and it will change your vote 🙂


About the author