Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?

By

Who’s the guy in the blazer? Ctrl + a few times …

Comment on Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo? by mcfc.

Who’s the guy in the blazer?

Ctrl + a few times for a closer look 🙂

mcfc Also Commented

Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
A quick reminder of what was going on about the time the paintings were commissioned.

“These artworks were commissioned two years ago and arrived recently and were hung,” read a Rangers statement. “It was a simple misunderstanding which has now been rectified.”

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-u-turn-sees-embarrassing-new-5683817

• Charles Green back at Ibrox as ‘consultant’ 02 Aug 2013

• Gers shareholders bid to oust Mather 02 Aug 2013

• Concern over Rangers chief’s salary 22 Jul 2013

• Mather continues in Rangers role 12 Jul 2013

• Murray calls for Rangers transparency 11 Jul 2013

• Rangers reveal changes to board 09 Jul 2013

• Rangers confirm no Whyte-Green link 30 May 2013

• SFA fines Green for ‘racist’ comment 02 May 2013

• Green steps down from Rangers role 19 Apr 2013

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23551370


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
Funny how the vocal bears can be so incensed by a poor oil painting yet be ignorant/disinterested in the laughable core of the club – finances, strategy, governance, performance, ethos.

Just been watching a few Dave Brailsford interviews and presentations. Could Ibrox be further from the mentality of Marginal Gains?

One of the gems in what he says is that when things go wrong, real winners look at themsleves for how they can improve, how they can work harder, how they can avoid mistakes. The ordinary, the good, and the very good naturally look outside themselves for what others need to do and external things that need to change.


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
MercDoc says:
Member: (60 comments)
May 11, 2015 at 10:57 pm

Is it just having the name Rangers, means you don’t like the rules that were already there to start with!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32699118

===================================================

What kind of rules are these? Where is the discretion loop hole to regard them as mere suggestions whenever the safe word “Rangers” is used.


Recent Comments by mcfc

Comment Moderation Thread
Mods – you’ve been very busy pruning comments over the past day or so. How would you describe the reason for that.

erm, moderation?

y4rmy – totally agree with your recently deleted comment – fancy a quick pint – and maybe a few slow ones ?


Comment Moderation Thread
Mods – you’ve been very busy pruning comments over the past day or so. How would you describe the reason for that.

erm, moderation?

y4rmy – totally agree with your recently deleted comment – fancy a quick pint – and maybe a few slow ones ?


Why We Need to Change
Football Fan says:
Member: (75 comments)
June 27, 2015 at 12:24 pm

There is also no evidence of Rangers not having a plan,we just don’t know what it is,again we just cannot presume there is no plan.

===========================

I can !!!


Why We Need to Change
Ironically FFs attempt to create FUD around PMG’s output and rebuild King’s reputation as Messiah and doer of financial miracles has solicited a number of well reasoned responses on several topics from several contributors. Collectively they lay out the many mine fields between here and fully funded bear nirvana.

So FFs achievement is to clarify for any undecided ST buyer that it’s a choice between a blind faith gamble of £411 on the word of a tardy, absentee, convicted criminal or paying at the gate. As FF has advised several times “we need to wait and see”. I suggest potential ST buyers take his advice and keep their options open. There could be an Xmas treat in it for the kids.


Why We Need to Change
Football Fan says:
Member: (66 comments)
June 27, 2015 at 11:13 am

So you are retracting “I believe all unsold shares can be bought by DK.” and acknowledging it is an extraordinaty claim or day dream
=======================================================================

No sir,all unsold shares can be bought by DK,it is a fact not an extraordinary claim.

=========================================================

So you know King’s resources are adequate to do so and/or he is minded to do so. Or are you saying “I believe all unsold shares can be bought by DK or any other current shareholder with the resources and will – because that’s how a rights issue works but no one has yet stated any intention to do so.”. In which case you are saying nothing of interest.


About the author