Good Try Mr. McKenzie

By

STEVIEBCFEBRUARY 4, 2017 at 22:42 And this could mean that only …

Comment on Good Try Mr. McKenzie by Cluster One.

STEVIEBCFEBRUARY 4, 2017 at 22:42
And this could mean that only the real hardcore support is left.
—————-
Would it get to the stage were (they say about other clubs 40,000 turn up for a cup final) but were are the fans the rest of the league games?

Cluster One Also Commented

Good Try Mr. McKenzie
ALLYJAMBOFEBRUARY 5, 2017 at 14:46
‘reputation’ is diminishing the longer he remains. ‘Go soon, mate, before it’s too late,’ type friendly advice.
—————————
And please go with no pay off, the least you can say is you managed “the most successful club in the world” (his words not mine). And we have no money to pay you off.How much smsm  friendly advice.will MW take before it becomes too much.
His most successful rant is were he lost any sympathy from me, that was up there with Charles Green clapping along to if you hate the SFA, and Ally’s who are these people


Good Try Mr. McKenzie
David Provan.
The midweek Tynecastle defeat was proof of a bang average rangers team desperately needing investment. But a board unable or unwilling to fund improvement, are doing nothing to support their manager.
If warbs sees out the season he should walk in the summer while his reputation is still intact.
—————————
If warbs walks he would walk with a pay off most likely by mutual agreement.That will cost the board lot’s of money. Then the board will need more money for a new manager and even more money to give him for transfer targets, in the meantime all or most of warbs signings will still need paid.
just were does David think this money is coming from to fund this? They may be unwilling to fund improvements as there are no “FUNDS” there in the first place  to support this manager.or any other manager.


Good Try Mr. McKenzie
TONYFEBRUARY 4, 2017 at 23:09       3 Votes 
CLUSTER ONEthat’s what it looks like,so between him and barton it could be costly
—————-
That’s why i just can’t see another gardening leave episode. Just how many Directors, managers, players have been on gardening leave for a couple of years old club?


Recent Comments by Cluster One

Who Is Conning Whom?
ALLYJAMBODECEMBER 8, 2017 at 11:27
and the only suggestion that the job might have been too big for him has come from a representative of TRFC, a source that clearly didn’t think it was too big for him until he turned it down.
————–
So true.


Who Is Conning Whom?
By the way; Sevco, MASSIVE, by what measure ?
————–
massive(ˈmӕsiv) adjectivehuge or heavy. a massive building; a massive burden of taxation. massief, enorm ضَخْم، كَبير масивен maciço masivní; těžký massiv massiv; enorm ογκώδηςenorme, monumental
————
MASSIVE, by what measure ?….Laughter over these last years. No other club comes close.


Who Is Conning Whom?
JOHN CLARKDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 22:32
Sack Level5 ( are they still the PR outfit? I’ve lost track?) but sack whoever wrote that statement, would be my advice
—————–
Michael Stewart@mstewart_23 Insinuating that Derek is not ready for the job really is a jilted lovers response. This whole episode does not look good for Rangers.
———-
Level 5. what a wast of money that could be spent on getting a manager.
Ps do the ibrox fans ever question just how much their cash strapped club spend on Level5 getting it wrong all the time?


Who Is Conning Whom?
HOMUNCULUSDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 20:16
EASYJAMBODECEMBER 7, 2017 at 20:17
————
Thanks for clarification,and the fact my old memory box is still working….kind off22


Who Is Conning Whom?
FAN OF FOOTBALLDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 19:55 0 0 Rate This
EJ/CAUSALUDENDI
From CG on the offical  site 2012
CHARLES GREEN has expressed his anger and dismay at the timing of the verdict of the First Tier Tax Tribunal as it has massively affected the current status of Rangers.It was finally revealed last week that Rangers had won the tax case brought by HMRC in relation to Employee Benefit Trusts used during the reign of Sir David Murray for a number of players and some staff.Despite a concerted campaign from certain quarters, which was often hateful, that decided that Rangers were guilty of “cheating” it has been proved that is not the case.The most important aspect of it all, however, is that had this verdict been delivered in May or June then Rangers would:Still be a member of the SPL.
————-
Still be a member of the SPL….Oh dear
All from CG on the offical  site 2012


About the author