Incorruptible FIFA World Cup Thread

By

Well done Germany. Best team in the tournament with some …

Comment on Incorruptible FIFA World Cup Thread by Campbellsmoney.

Well done Germany. Best team in the tournament with some of the standout players. Bring them on.

Campbellsmoney Also Commented

Incorruptible FIFA World Cup Thread
Sorry World Cup Bagsy Limited filed for administration this afternoon.


Incorruptible FIFA World Cup Thread
Although they were my bagsy, I shed no tears over the departure from the competition of Uruguay.

I agree with comments above that Brazil don’t look like winners – but playing at home might yet get them over the line. With the exception of Colombia (what a lovely goal last night) the French, Germans and Dutch all look better teams than the S Americans. Very open tournament, which is nice.


Incorruptible FIFA World Cup Thread
Twopanda – (Raheem) sterling work.


Recent Comments by Campbellsmoney

.. and they wonder why nobody buys papers
I was in The 20 Horseshoe


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
Barca

I really can’t explain what you have asked with any certainty but here are some thoughts and comments.

We can’t be sure that the claim is by DK.

In a CVA, it is necessary to get 75% of creditors to vote in favour. But it is also necessary to get 50% of unconnected creditors to vote in favour. Directors claims will be treated as connected.

There is no reason why a creditor should not, if they want to, not claim in A CVA but later decide to submit a claim in the liquidation. It would be unusual but not prohibited.

As for how an investment in equity in one company can later become a claim to be a creditor in another company – that I simply cannot explain. I can only suggest that we do not have all the necessary facts.


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
Resinlabdog well said sir (or madam).

Anyone out there want to discuss what the phrase “sense of entitlement ” might mean when it is not being used about a team from Govan?

BigPink – :”phoenix” companies has no meaning in law. None whatsoever. So if Sir David Murray, Craig Whyte, John Greig, Bill Struth and Lawrence Marlborough all get appointed to the board of either of the companies currently trading as Rangers, it matters little. What do you think will (or perhaps should) “trigger “?


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
Test

Are you Bob Crampsey? 🙂

SFM


Did Stewart Regan Ken Then Wit We Ken Noo?
Regarding 216 again (sorry )

Even if Sevco had not changed its name, 216 would still apply because the company trades as Rangers. 216 strikes at trading names as well as company names.

Mr King has made great play today of how s216 is a little known piece of legislation. And how the old board have referred to it.

His intention in doing so is of course to suggest that but for the old board raising the issue, he would not have had to bother going through the court to get leave to be involved in a Rangers company.

Well funnily enough, the law applies whether or not anyone knows about it. In fact, if he didn’t know about it until the old board mentioned it he should perhaps say thank you.
.


About the author