Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?

Avatar By

Could we get off the Ibrox disaster thread please surely …

Comment on Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol? by smallteaser.

Could we get off the Ibrox disaster thread please surely for another site.

smallteaser Also Commented

Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
easyJambo says:
September 7, 2012 at 15:57

Chris McLaughlin‏@BBCchrismclaug
Dual contracts hearing will kickstart next week. Procedural hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday.
=====================================================================
This being a hearing, will Joe Public be able to hear?
Will selected members of the MSM be able to hear?
Will it be behind closed doors, so that no one knows the procedure agreed nor what is being discussed.
Will it be like the last hearing where the specific remit was never announced only the decision.

Transparency my ares


Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
The CVA was formally rejected on the 14th June.
22nd June Lord Hodge demands a report from D & D, and wants it within two week.
It was said the administrators would still be in house for 10 – 12 weeks before BDO take over.
12 weeks today have now passed since the CVA was rejected, someone is delaying this, and its not by accident.
I would imagine that the result of the FTT and BDO taking over from D & D will take place at the same time.

The same smell still surrounds this, and the fear is that this will all disappear.

Forget, Templeton signing, forget McCoist bully boy, lets get to the real issues here, why all the delays??


Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
I think there are a number of companies selling packages for Ibrox, Bluechip is one of them.


Recent Comments by smallteaser

Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM says:
September 21, 2012 at 09:46
0 0 i Rate This

———————————————————————————————–
Again thats your personal viewpoint, you are calling yourself The Scottish Football Monitor but the comments you post as such are personal, and going by last nights posts not always reflective of the site called The Scottish Football Monitor.
__________________________________________________________________

smallteaser – and you call yourself that
I’m fairly confident that what I said was fairly “reflective” of opinion on the blog. If it transpired that it was not, there would be little point in hanging around.
————————————————————————————-

I guess what you are saying here is that anyone who disagreed with your point of view, either on the banner issue last night, or in fact anything else you say, should really leave the blog?
The blog appeared to be split 50/50 last night so I don’t agree that your comments were reflective of the blog as a whole.
Should I stay or should I go? Is there any point in “hanging around”?


Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM says:
September 21, 2012 at 09:22

You can ask, but I won’t be posting under two aliases. There is no conflict as far as I can see.
———————————————————————————————–
Again thats your personal viewpoint, you are calling yourself The Scottish Football Monitor but the comments you post as such are personal, and going by last nights posts not always reflective of the site called The Scottish Football Monitor.


Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM, may I ask where you are posting your own point of view rather than the overall viewpoint of a moderator of TSFM you post under a different name.
If you use the TSFM for posting personal comments then that may be construed as the view of the whole site, which it may not be.


Make our Mind Up Time
Danish Pastry says:
September 21, 2012 at 08:44

So it’s to be Adidas next season? All shaping up nicely for potential shareholders. I wonder if any of the shareholders in old Rangers will be buying a stake in the new? It would seem pointless since Charles insists it’s the same Rangers. And that must be true, you can tell by glints in t’eyes

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-chief-charles-green-set-1335458
———————————————————————————————————-
41 points posted on CG’s Canadian speech yesterday most of which are lies and can be picked holes in and the DR goes with this one!!! Yet another bit of positive spin. I wonder if they asked how much it was worth…..sorry could be worth, doesn’t look like it.
Maybe they asked Adidas how they felt….. doesn’t look like it.

http://forweonlyknow.wordpress.com/


Make our Mind Up Time
RayCharles says:

September 21, 2012 at 04:12
Just as an aside. In a classic piece of whatabouery:

A banner saying “Paedo Free in Div 3″ was unveiled at a ground recently.

I do not find it offensive although many will.
————————————————————–
As there was no caricature of anyone wearing team colours it could have been meant for anyone, why would you take offence??


About the author

Avatar