Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?

Avatar By

Hoopy 7 says: September 7, 2012 at 13:36 The Rules just confirm …

Comment on Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol? by CrazyHorse.

Hoopy 7 says:
September 7, 2012 at 13:36

The Rules just confirm why a lot of us think that there will be no flotation.
But in the event that this is wrong I am of the opinion that it will fail.

I concur Hoopy 7. More chance of hitting the crossbar, from the halfway line, blindfolded, with a back heeler than a successful if any flotation.

CrazyHorse Also Commented

Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
Copy and paste link below for some light reading on a Friday afternoon. In order to float Charles Le Vert would have to reveal his hand, can’t wait.


Also came across this headline;
Rangers to float as it chases global glory, The Guardian, Friday 31 March 2000

Jump forward a decade or so, how about;
Rangers to float as it chases Ramsdens Cup glory, MSM/Media House, September 2012

Made me smile.

Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
john clarke says:
September 3, 2012 at 14:52

That’s all getting a bit condescending isn’t it?

There appears to be two camps among Celtic supporters. The PL ‘dignified silence’ camp and those of us that are not so convinced. It doesn’t make us guilty of ‘trolling agent-provocateur-ship’. We are all entitled to express our opinions on here and just because you and others happen to disagree doesn’t make it ‘juvenile nonsense’. I stopped posting yesterday because I detected a bit of a dismissive attitude towards me and thought what’s the point.

The only reasoning I have consistently read justifying Celtic’s silence is that of the carnage in the streets variety. If that is truly the case what a sad indictment of ‘the best wee country in the world’. The threat of violence overrides free speech – really? As I have said previously I just hope that a golden opportunity has not already been lost. I have supported Celtic for most of my life (50 next St Patrick’s day); it doesn’t mean that I blindly agree with everything they have done, past or future. Just for the record, no one will be happier than me if PL really is ‘playing a blinder’.

Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
TheBlackKnight TBK says:
September 2, 2012 at 12:35

The Iceman on September 1, 2012 at 22:16

Iceman, you are entitled to your opinion but it’s utter b*llocks!

Until there is something concrete to make comment on, or that directly affects (or threatens) our club, then ‘observed silence’ is the correct route.

TBK, a tad on the harsh side methinks. You too are entitled to your opinion but…..well you know the rest!

Recent Comments by CrazyHorse

Daft and Dafter
Markybhoy & Neepheid

Your posts echo many of my sentiments. I did not renew my season tickets last season. I had hoped to be able to renew this season but the unopposed re-election of Campbell Ogilvie really was the last (of many) straw(s). I nearly smashed the telly when I seen him giving out the gongs at the Scottish Cup Final, talk about a GIRFUY to Scottish football supporters. My son, who was originally gutted at my non-renewal couldn’t care less now; he has found better things to do. I have to say I am hanging on by a fingertip, if only because of a desire to see all the perpetrators of this scam exposed. I said months ago on here that every campaign needs a focal point. Ogilvie should be that focus, he is an easy target. He should be vociferously derided at every live Scottish game on Sky/BT in the forthcoming season. A concerted effort might even get noticed by Sky/BT commentators who may just ask a few questions. I live in England these days and sadly the average football fan is blissfully unaware about the many machinations of the Rangers scandal. Use the power of live TV to spread the story and start with the brazen Campbell. ‘We want Ogilvie OOT!

The SPFL— the case for revolution, evolution and a case of the Hamilton Whackies !
Robert Coyle says:
Kenny Moyes, any relation to David?

I do believe it’s his brother

The SPFL— the case for revolution, evolution and a case of the Hamilton Whackies !
Just seen wee Malcolm Murray scuttling around Berkeley Square, Mayfair, a favourite haunt of hedgies and spivs. He was resplendent in his Rangers golf sweater, five stars and all. The best word I could use to describe his appearance is haunted!

The Existence of Laws
briggsbhoy says:
Friday, May 24, 2013 at 10:49

Apart from wondering who these guys were I was thinking mainly why would you have possession of someone’s passport photograph and why or who would have needed to have a possessed a copy for their records ?

Solicitors are required to obtain personal identification documents to verify client’s identities.
This requirement relates to any person/corporate body that own 25% or more of the shares in a company. Generally they want certified copies of passports or photocard driving licences, together with a certified copy of a recent (i.e. no more than 3 months’ old) utility bill or bank statement which confirms names and home addresses. Just handed mine over recently during company lease renewal.

Fair Play at FIFA?

‘Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive’. Read all about Coventry City (Various Entities) Ltd. Which company owns the ‘Golden Share’? Which company is the club? These guys along with the likes of Green, Whyte, Masterton, Murray etc are at it. Add to this the eye watering amounts of tax owed by various European household names and football is fast becoming a joke, except it’s not feckin funny.

About the author