Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?

Avatar By

CrazyHorse says: September 7, 2012 at 13:22 Copy and paste link below …

Comment on Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol? by midcalderan.

CrazyHorse says:
September 7, 2012 at 13:22

Copy and paste link below for some light reading on a Friday afternoon. In order to float Charles Le Vert would have to reveal his hand, can’t wait.
————————————
There’s too many sections on “Disclosure” for TRFC to have a successful listing. But then again, “Disclosure”, we are TRFC, surely this doesn’t mean full disclosure, can we not just disclose the good bits?

midcalderan Also Commented

Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
john clarke says:
September 7, 2012 at 12:19

My mail has just come in. …………… As predicted by an earlier poster, HMRC ( in the form of Graham Brammer, Director, Debt Management and Banking) has, in the words of my Mp’s covering letter, “hidden behind ‘confidentiality’ as a reason not to respond directly to their public statement’.
——————–
John, you are correct. I can’t see how HMRC can hide behind confidentiality regarding their statement. You are not seeking information about a third party’s tax affairs in relation to the statement. You are asking HMRC to explain their statement, one which they have put into the public domain.


Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
tombrann says:
September 7, 2012 at 09:16

I well remember the dreadful day of the disaster, it was several hours before we knew that a family member was safe. There was no phone, and it was only when he arrived home
————————————
I too remember that dreadful day. We were gathered at a work colleague’s house in East Kilbride for a work related New Year party. Our host was an Aberdeen supporter, myself a Celtic supporter as well as a few others who supported others teams and some none at all had gathered. One of our managers who we expected at the party was a Rangers supporter who we knew was attending the match. He didn’t turn up at the agreed time and the party never got started as we were so worried about his safety. He eventually arrived later in the evening to the relief and delight of us all. He explained what misery and carnage he had seen and we then all went home feeling very sad.

It is clear that young McMurdo has no idea or sought to gain an understanding what it was like to be a football supporter or ordinary Glaswegian on that day. If he is aware and I’m sure his father has made him fully aware of the horrible events of that day, it is reprehensible for him to use these events to stir up hatred in order to attempt to raise his personal profile within the TRFC community. (Midcalderan, aged 64).


Where now for the Judicial Panel Protocol?
Hoopy 7 says:
September 6, 2012 at 10:11

What causes good professional people, who clearly know better, to take the wrong path and ignore, break or invent rules?
———–
Because they think they can.


Recent Comments by midcalderan

A Question of Trust (Updated)
Henry Clarson says:
Friday, February 1, 2013 at 17:52

beatipacificiscotia says:

Friday, February 1, 2013 at 17:21

The number of thumbs down I got for suggesting something that might help Rangers just shows how anti-Rangers this board is.
________________________________________________
My impression of this board is that it is anti-corruption.
It so happens that a great deal of evidence has been gathered that one particular Scottish football club has played an enormous part in corrupting Scottish football. Nobody who is anti-corruption would want to see that club benefit from the havoc which it has caused, especially when that club still refuses to give the slightest indication that it recognises its culpability or feels any remorse.
————————————————————
They will have been given the opportunity to exculpate themselves. Do you think they will have grasped it? If they do, could we all move on? I think we could.


The Real Battle Begins?
TheBlackKnight TBK says:
Wednesday, November 28, 2012 at 12:22

APOLOGIES IN ADVANCE FOR THE CAPITALS – NOT THROUGH ANGER OR SHOUTING – JUST FOR EMPHASIS!
“CHARLES GREEN has expressed his anger and dismay at the timing of the verdict of the First Tier Tax Tribunal as it has massively affected the current status of Rangers.”
————–
I thought Charles was trying to convey that if Mr Red and Mr Black had not messed HMRC around from 2004, this matter could have been resolved many, many years ago.

He also suggests – quite rightly – that RFC could have avoided administration and liquidation had they cooperated with HMRC and in getting the case to FTTT. Without these extraordinary delays he would not have been able to purchase the valuable assets of RFC at such a low price, gain control of TRFC and rightly or wrongly, go on to make what he anticipates to be a substantial profit.

I think he forgot to include in his statement, “Mr Black and Mr Red, I thank you both for bringing about this chain of events”.


The Real Battle Begins?
theglen2012 says:
Monday, November 26, 2012 at 00:05

Do I, or anyone with half a brain think that the EBT’s were set up for anything other than paying players higher wages than the club could possibly afford? No. Clearly not. But, the point is, 2 persons with much greater legal acumen then I have decided that, on the evidence provided, it cannot be proven that that is the case.
————————————

TG2012, thanks for the interesting post. Whilst I agree that the verdict for the time being is no doubt a tax related victory for RFC, please correct me if I’m wrong but from the dissenting judges’ comments at Page 67, Para 35, I thought Mr Black may have admitted in evidence that was precisely the reason why EBTs were used.

“As for Mr Black, he denied that the scheme was for tax avoidance in cross-examination, though he went on to describe the scheme as ‘a method of us acquiring, especially football wise, better players in a more cost effective manner than we would be able to do so’; that the club had been ‘very ambitious at that time’; and ‘it was seen as a correct and proper way for us to proceed’; that Rangers ‘have been very successful, because we’ve been able to attract players of a certain standard that, perhaps, we may not have been able to otherwise’ (Day 5/126).”

Keep posting.


Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?
john clarke says:
Saturday, November 24, 2012 at 00:30
0 0 Rate This
Agrajag says:
Saturday, November 24, 2012 at 00:01
‘..Irony doesn’t really work if you have to explain it.’

Had me going for a while, as well!-
————-
Are you related to Henry Kissinger JC? Really need to go now, my boss is on patrol.


Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?
Agrajag says:
Saturday, November 24, 2012 at 00:10

midcalderan says:
Saturday, November 24, 2012 at 00:05

————–
I give up. The blog policeman wins.

============================

You said ” Differences of opinion is why we have …”

I replied “Nonsense”

It was intended as badinage, sorry if it offended you. Clearly we have a different sense of humour. No “blog Policeman” about it, just a bad joke.
—————
You may wonder why I’m still online. The night watchman let me into his hut to use his computer. We’re obviously on a different level of intellect but but have looked up the the meaning of the words you’ve used, I can now laugh at your joke.


About the author

Avatar