LNS – A Summary

By

So has everyone sent that nice QC a link to …

Comment on LNS – A Summary by nawlite.

So has everyone sent that nice QC a link to Murray’s comment? (Is that slander or libel, btw?)

nawlite Also Commented

LNS – A Summary
Jimbo says – “….It’s quite incredible that they have hung on to the biggest millstone round their necks – Auchenhowie. Why they thought that operation was crucial in the lower divisions is astounding. It’s a luxury they can’t afford. Before Murray opened it old Rangers managed without it. Can only be pride and the fear of embarrassment if they took the right business decision.”
Nothing to do with pride or fear of embarrassment, Jimbo. You need to remember that the whole omnishambles or ‘fleecing methodology’ is based on the willingness of the gullible to believe in the big lie. It always had to be seen as Rangers, no matter what the haters said, so it was absolutely vital that they hold onto Murray Park, Ibrox etc. The old Rangers wouldn’t have let them go so new Rangers couldn’t be seen to either, because that might have made the gullible think “hang on a minute, ….”.
They were relying on blindness and still are.


LNS – A Summary
Zero Tolerance, I don’t think the issue is with the potential disciplinary proceedings resulting in a 3-0 loss; more to do with why the team walked off in the first place.


LNS – A Summary
BP, Tris, does SFM have any contact with/contacts within Supporters Direct so that we could have them put the types of question JC asks above to the Minister for Sport?


Recent Comments by nawlite

Enough is enough
EB, you state that the SFA’s rules allowed them discretion to transfer the membership. Just for clarity – is your reason for doing so purely to clarify for others on here that the SFA did not break their rules in allowing the transfer? I.e. a warning not to claim the SFA breached their rules?
Or is your reason for stating it an argument that the transfer of membership allows the current ‘Rangers’ to claim that it is the same entity as the ‘Rangers’ currently in liquidation?


Enough is enough
AS, you need to remember that as far as the SFA is concerned there’s no uncertainty ‘cos Dave said he would put the money in! So that’s awrite then.


Enough is enough
If Dorrans’ signing was after the accounts cut-off, then I can only see Cardoso, Pena, Herrera, Candeias and Morelos signing for a fee according to TransferMarket. Their fees listed there total only £7,380m not the c£10m shown in the accounts. Anyone any ideas?


Enough is enough
Given that Dave doesn’t have any control, I’m wondering who the nice person at NOAL is who keeps sending TRFC money out of the goodness of his heart?!?


Enough is enough
Tris, you say “Celtic wouldn’t be risking very much if some more equitable model was introducedThey’d still have more money than most.”
Of course they would………but only most in Scotland. That’s my point – why would they weaken themselves against the ‘big’ European clubs whom they have ambitions to better or at least compete with? You suggest they should because somewhere down the line they MIGHT need to improve due to increased competition from better domestic clubs. Seriously? “Let’s weaken ourselves against the clubs we’re aspiring to match in the hope that years ahead we MIGHT get better and they (keeping all their money) don’t”!?!?!?!
Let’s be realistic. You can’t expect a business/club to do that.
I want better competition and improving standards in Scottish football as much as anyone, but the more naïve comments I hear, the more I’m convinced that it can only be done by somehow forcing UEFA to drive it from the top down (or, as you say, the bubble bursts and we start from scratch).


About the author