LNS – A Summary

Avatar By

A short historical note on John Greig’s face-fuzz: Greig had received …

Comment on LNS – A Summary by Jingso.Jimsie.

A short historical note on John Greig’s face-fuzz:

Greig had received a blow on the chin, which split open & required stitches. He was unable to shave for a few weeks.

http://sport.stv.tv/football/145877-the-truth-behind-john-greigs-beard-and-the-cup-winners-cup/

Jingso.Jimsie Also Commented

LNS – A Summary
Interesting that McMurdo Major is over on JJ stating that there were more clubs than RFC ‘at it’ regarding contract/salary declarations to the SFA & that it will all be swept under the carpet, because not to do just that would bring the SFA down. He also plays the ‘Sooper’ card, that he knows names & clubs. 

He’s been told to put up or shut up by one poster. I won’t hold my breath for the first to occur.

‘Ratufa macroura macroura’, IMO.


LNS – A Summary
The Cat NR1 15th December 2015 at 4:55 pm 
…I thought that we already had a consensus of 41 with one lone dissenting voice?…
======================================================

My inference was that ‘consensus with the position of no title stripping’ as held by RIFC/TRFC/Mooney. Apologies if it was not clear.

I’m not at all sure that the vote would be 41 to 1, either.


LNS – A Summary
I’ve just been reading the ‘Dave’ letter.

I was instantly reminded of Alex Mooney’s frankly incredible piece in the Daily Record from the 18th of November, where he suggested that fences should be mended, we should seek consensus, let bygones be bygones etc. & Dave & Pete should (wait for it…) go for dinner & aid those discussions with a nice bottle of red!

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/alex-mooney-rangers-use-ebts-6852612


Recent Comments by Jingso.Jimsie

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
UPTHEHOOPS

MAY 3, 2017 at 07:20        

Just watching a clip from Sky Sports where Davie Provan was asked what would it take for Rangers to close the gap on Celtic. “Hard cash”, was his answer, but no insight as to where it will come from. Just like Walter Smith, Ally McCoist, Willie Henderson etc.

I wonder why people are scared to point out Rangers were never really rich, that they just had a very friendly bank, then adopted very dodgy tax avoidance practices…
——————————————————-

I suspect the only time that any form of Rangers had ‘hard cash’ in the last thirty years was in the immediate aftermath of Chuck’s IPO.

I wonder what happened to it?


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I noticed a link to this article elsewhere & I think it’s worth sharing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/sports/soccer/cybernetics-cesarean-sections-and-soccers-most-magnificent-mind.html?ref=oembed&_r=0


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
HOMUNCULUS

MAY 1, 2017 at 10:50        
One can often gauge what the current popular view is by reading the scribblings in the daily record. In particular those of Keith Jackson…
———————————————————-

You have to remember that the Monday morning ‘Keich By Keith’ is an ‘opinion’ piece, rather than reportage.

His opinion, going by today’s column, is rather confused.


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I read Ewen Murray’s report last evening. It’s a decent piece, particularly when compared to BBC Scotland’s on-line match report. However, like many, he’s in denial or ignorance about the songbook. The BTL comments are worth reading as well.


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
Thanks to those who replied to my query of 1704 yesterday.

Without prejudice, I’ll just leave this here.

I’m sure the majority of readers can work out what I mean.


About the author

Avatar