The Lost Voice of the Armageddon Virus

Avatar By

ALLYJAMBOJUNE 10, 2017 at 10:06       9 Votes  bigboab1916June 10, 2017 at 00:36 Should …

Comment on The Lost Voice of the Armageddon Virus by Cluster One.

ALLYJAMBOJUNE 10, 2017 at 10:06       9 Votes 
bigboab1916June 10, 2017 at 00:36
Should the authorities take it upon themselves to pursue King he can be done for knowingly breaching the data protection act, he released confidential information knowing the information bought and released would be identifiable to all who heard the message and would understand the reason behind it and its intent to damage. The theft of data is significant as the IT guy, if it was an IT qualified person, has breached his confidentiality clause and is open to prosecution. King cannot deny he did not know who was on the recordings and the fact he paid for them and used them is enough to involve him in a company conspiracy._________________________
What you have written there is exactly the kind of thing that Grant Russell should have put into his article to expand on the minimalist reporting of King’s (alleged) involvement with stolen computer files,
—————————-
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15334390.Two_former_Rangers_execs_could_still_face_the_music_after_Craig_Whyte_s_fraud_trial_acquittal/?ref=twtrec
Article say’s 
It comes as police confirmed that the Dave King was not being investigated after it was claimed the Rangers chairman had paid around £20,000 for private mails and other documents allegedly “hacked” from Craig Whyte.
It was revealed during Mr Whyte’s fraud trial that the South Africa-based businessman had acquired the so-called Charlotte Fakes material from a third party.
It was Whyte’s lawyer Donald Findlay QC who made the claim about the Charlotte Fakes material during legal talks as he questioned prosecution evidence saying: “An individual known to the Crown hacked into the computer of Mr Whyte and stole material. It was then used, putting it broadly, for potential blackmail.
“This material was recovered in some way from the thief because of a payment of a significant amount by Mr King.”
In October, 2014, a man was accused of leaking secret material surrounding Rangers was subject of a report to the Fiscal.
The man faced an extortion charge over claims private details about the club and ex-owner Craig Whyte were revealed on Twitter account Charlotte Fakes.
“The Procurator Fiscal has received a report concerning a 46-year-old man in connection with alleged incidents between March 2013 and July 2014,” said a Crown Office spokesman.
“The report remains under consideration.”
The man reportedly told Mr King he had Mr Whyte’s permission to release the data.
A Police Scotland source confirmed: “There is no investigation involving Dave King.”
A Rangers spokesman said that Mr King would not be commenting on the court claim and added that to be correct, these emails were neither stolen nor hacked”.
———-
documents allegedly “hacked” from Craig Whyte.
An individual known to the Crown hacked into the computer of Mr Whyte and stole material. It was then used, putting it broadly, for potential blackmail.

commenting on the court claim and added that to be correct, these emails were neither stolen nor hacked”.
Who is telling the truth?
———————-

Cluster One Also Commented

The Lost Voice of the Armageddon Virus
https://henryclarson.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/strong-rangers-2/
A strong rangers.


The Lost Voice of the Armageddon Virus
From above pic.
what i want to see is competition. i’m always disappointed when that’s not there.
—————–
Never heard him complain before through the EBT years about competition.


The Lost Voice of the Armageddon Virus
try again


Recent Comments by Cluster One

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
DARKBEFOREDAWNJANUARY 2, 2018 at 03:48
It would take all scrutiny away from the club and could leave the chairman role to someone more respected such as Alistair Johnston.
————-
You do know Alistair Johnston.was on the board during the EBT years and  Johnston admits the other ongoing tax probe could leave Rangers with a bill they cannot afford to pay.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
UPTHEHOOPSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 21:21
I am a Celtic shareholder and if it was up to me (which it is not), I would tell the SFA here and now that Celtic Park is unavailable for any future fixture.  However I know that will not happen, but I doubt there is anything they could do to force Celtic to allow them use of the stadium.  
————
FROM LINK ABOVE.
The SFA board is due to meet in late January to consider its findings and, although no final decision is expected at that stage, it will shape Hampden’s future.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
CLUSTER ONEJANUARY 1, 2018 at 20:50
Agreed… but just where would the SFA call home?
————-
15) With recent coverage surrounding the SFA and the Hampden lease expiring in 2020, there’s asuspicion that the SFA will take internationals, finals etc to Parkhead. Can we expect the board tovigorously push Ibrox for these fixtures and thus create another important revenue stream?The Executive is in close dialogue with the SFA with regards to the situation at Hampden.

Click to access AGM-2017-QA.pdf


————–
Hope all the other clubs executives are in close dialogue with the SFA with regards to the situation at Hampden.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HOMUNCULUSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 20:38
There is absolutely no reason why games can’t be played in Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, or anywhere else with a stadium suitable for a specific match.
Agreed… but just where would the SFA call home?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HOMUNCULUSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 19:39
Most, not all. One also wonders who pays for the upkeep of the stadium and other associated costs.
—————–
The Spiders, who remain an amateur club and are celebrating their 150th anniversary, say comments made by SFA chief executive Stewart Regan to BBC Scotland had caused them “great concern”.
They said in a website statement that they “would seek confirmation from the Scottish FA that they have fulfilled their responsibilities, under the present lease, to maintain the stadium and further detailed evidence to support Mr Regan’s statement”.
http://www.queensparkfc.co.uk/?p=6195


About the author

Avatar