Podcast Episode 1

Avatar By

Re : Rangers/Sevco haters . As an atheist Celtic fan with …

Comment on Podcast Episode 1 by hamemadesoup.

re : Rangers/Sevco haters .

As an atheist Celtic fan with a brother who supported Rangers , any oneupmanship on OF game days was entirely football based . I didn’t hate him , I love him , but I couldn’t stand his team . Note that I didn’t use the word hate , not yet anyway .
When Rangers were liquidated he was finished with the game , heading for the golf course instead . He hated SDM for his suicidal economics and hated what his club had done to the Scottish game . I hate them for the very same reasons .
I have no ill feelings towards DAFC , they overspend ,they hit administration and the fans rally round and save the club . Same situation with HMFC , fans have rallied round ( including this Celtic fan going to their friendly with Wolfsburg) and are currently exiting admin .
However , the Sevco situation is completely different . Finger pointing , dog whistling , threats , Lawell conspiracies , fractured supporters groups and the audacity to claim that they are the same club . Wild claims about GCC that the brilliant Echoboy booted straight into touch , same song book , faux dignity and a line of spivs that would fill a McGills coach (other coach firms are available) .
So , what’s left to love about Sevco ?

Answers on the back of a stamp to the usual address ! 🙄

hamemadesoup Also Commented

Podcast Episode 1
Tartanwulver says:
February 20, 2014 at 9:10 pm
7 0 Rate This

Mods…please…step in and axe everything to do with this drawn out and extremely tedious spat that’s going on. There are interesting things going on – but that’s certainly not one of them
Exactly , outside or pack it in :mrgreen:

Podcast Episode 1
andy says:
February 20, 2014 at 7:15 pm
11 4 Rate This

from McMurdos blog

February 20, 2014 – 30 Comments


By Billy Grimm

That’s got to be the funniest thing I’ve read in a while . Is that really McMurdo ? 😮

Podcast Episode 1
Campbellsmoney says:
February 18, 2014 at 3:27 pm
16 0 Rate This

hamemadesoup says:
February 18, 2014 at 3:13 pm
1 0 i
Rate This

Campbellsmoney says:
February 18, 2014 at 2:45 pm
3 0 Rate This
”In the abstract – yes – but:

1 there is no such a company in existence (at the moment); and
2 even then he would not be allowed to be involved in the management of the “clumpany” (even at two removes)”

1 It wouldn’t take the shameless and glib one long to cobble something together
2 It wouldn’t take the shameless and glib one long to find a lackey / fire-in or puppet or two to keep enough of a distance from a fit & proper test . The man likes a lie , a purveyor of untruths , don’t underestimate his modus operandi .


1. No – probably not – but plenty of people have tried all sorts to get round this rule before – anyway that would involve such a new company buying either TRFC or RIFC (not impossible of course) but if it is trumpeted as a Mr David King purchase, its a bit difficult to disguise his involvement in the management and if its not trumpeted as a Mr David King purchase – then how do we know its him and why would whoever fronts it get the love of the fans (which love is pretty much reserved for Mr David King at the moment).

2. This is nothing to do with any fit and proper person nonsense. That is made up stupid football crap. This is proper law
CM , I actually agree with you on both points . I think I’ve started to succumb to some strange mental condition . Since those heady days back on RTC , I’ve seen them die and return as Sevco . The pessimist in me sees a few “incarnations” to come , I just can’t shake the thought . Dave King (I know , I know) seems to be the bear with the bucks . Ill-gotten or not , and again the pessimist in me sees him pulling it off somehow . The SFA and SPFL don’t seem to mind a “Rangers forever” either , so as you say , it may not be King , but I’m sure the authorities would try to overlook any connections if he tried . Just a layman’s view , obviously . I know I’m in the right place to be put right , thankfully :mrgreen:

Recent Comments by hamemadesoup

Armageddon? What Armageddon?
Smugas says:
May 16, 2014 at 11:37 am
15 1 Rate This

My interpretation of the ST stand off is this.

GW – so Mr RFC lawyer, what we need you to do is provide a letter of undertaking that the fans can have the stadium and training ground

Lawyer – you mean a security?

GW – Jeez no, don’t be silly

Lawyer – Ah I get your drift, something a bit more flowery, pandering to the masses and all that. A cosmetic promise to do something sometime..

GW – Exactly.

Lawyer – Right I’ll need the deeds.

GW – Ah…………
GW- ….. Mr Whyte isn’t returning our calls .

Lawyer – Craig or Thomas ?

GW – Neither .

Lawyer – I’ll get my coat , have a nice day .


Armageddon? What Armageddon?
Paulmac2 says:
May 14, 2014 at 10:54 am
12 0 Rate This

Don’t be surprised if the pre-season glamour friendlies/charity games at Ibrox start within the next 7-10 days.
El Galacticos ? Milanese giants ? What could be a more appealing and glamorous friendly for the sleeping Glasgow behemoths ?

Linfield . 🙄

Armageddon? What Armageddon?
sixtaeseven says:
May 12, 2014 at 7:50 pm
5 0 Rate This

“Armageddon? What Armageddon?”

It’s perfectly obvious what Armageddon they were meaning.
The Armageddon of one club, and one club only.
Not much has changed, it’s just watered down a wee bit.
I now await next season’s flying circus in the knowledge that the Championship is the bestest, hardest league in the wurld.
Whilst scrolling down the page , your last two lines looked like an Ibrox press release at a glance . Just as well I double checked 🙄

Podcast Episode 4 – Turnbull Hutton
ecobhoy says:
May 10, 2014 at 11:05 am
12 0 Rate This

James Doleman says:
May 10, 2014 at 10:23 am


News to me but I’m tied up with the Brooks/Coulson trial so not really staying on top of the tax thing. Would suggest Mr Baxendale may have other reasons to do a midnight flit, never seen any suggestion he is in any way liable for how EBT scheme operated at Ibrox.
Somewhere, deep in my rusty memory banks, I seem to remember seeing somewhere that Baxendale’s very strict guidelines for operating the EBT scheme weren’t followed at Rangers. I could well be wrong but perhaps someone else might be able to identify a possible source for my memory fragment
Was the pornographer not quoted somewhere as saying ” I can build you a vehicle but I’m not responsible for how you drive it ” , or something equally facetious ?

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
Auldheid says:
May 1, 2014 at 12:36 am
2 1 Rate This

Jean Brodie

We observers have a choice. Focus on what is on offer or on what is not.

Work with what is there or what is not.

Encourage or criticise.

Prolong or end.

Our move.
Our move ? No .

The next move is required by either the perpetrators or the governing bodies . The ideal statement from the SFA should be something along the lines of ……..

Singing of song X = Closed doors next home match .
Repeated singing of song X = Closed doors next 5 home matches .

This should apply to all “banned songs” , for all teams . You could , by this method ,eradicate it in one season . If you behave in an exclusionary manner , expect to be excluded . It’s well into the 21st century , enough is enough .

About the author