Podcast Episode 1

Avatar By

Wottpi To be fair, neither Ryan nor Jack has ever pretended …

Comment on Podcast Episode 1 by TSFM.

wottpi

To be fair, neither Ryan nor Jack has ever pretended to know what the answer is – if there is one. My problem from time to time with Jack is that instead of engaging consistently (yes he does contribute in a valuable way imo – but sporadically) he tries to undermine individuals on here – and the blog itself by baiting people.

If we had another couple of Jacks maybe they wouldn’t feel so isolated as GJ does, which may be the cause of is frustration.

Ryan has no such agenda, and is a healing presence on the blog. I hope he continues to post because people are willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in way they won’t for GJ given his sometimes difficult manner.

TSFM Also Commented

Podcast Episode 1
New post up.


Podcast Episode 1
Lots of trouble with the site today. Lots of Far East traffic on the server – unrelated to any possible involvement from any un-named PR firm :mrgreen:

Will continue to work on it, but have a listen to the new Podcast (you can get it from the sidebar at the top of the page).

or here
http://www.podcastgarden.com/podcast/tsfm


Podcast Episode 1
davythelotion says:

February 23, 2014 at 10:08 pm
One of the other major difference then & now was that there is no β€˜pass back’ allowed. This has drastically increased the pace of the game and requires keepers to play the ball with their feet.
That said, you can only do what you can, the fact is that both Clark & Foster’s achievements deserve credit in their own right. If it was easy everyone would be doing it!!

_________________________________________________________

Bobby Clark also played at centre-half on several occasions when the Dons were stuck. Maybe one of the few ‘keepers who would have been comfortable with the no-pass back rule πŸ™‚

Latest Podcast is awaiting our guest’s approval of the edit before publishing. Nothing untoward – just a courtesy we like to extend.

Also there is a new blog on the way about an initiative Auldheid has on the go on behalf of our community. That should be published in a day or so.
All in all then it will be a busy week for content …
… and there’s the UTT revving up …


Recent Comments by TSFM

Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
bogsdollox says:

March 7, 2014 at 1:08 pm

Alan Price says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rangers were not the lender. The Sub-Trusts, into which Rangers made a contribution via an EBT, are the β€œlender”. Rangers gave the money away and there can be no suggestion of repayment to them.
__________________________________________________________________

Yes, but had the loans been repaid by the lendees, Rangers would have been able to apply for one themselves had they set up a sub-trust in their favour. Therefore the money would have been available to the club in times of hardship.

Or perhaps I am missing something here?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Auldheid
Res 12 is as you say important, but I am convinced that Celtic have no desire whatsoever to pursue its aims.
We could have a discussion about the possible reasons, but ultimately if DD is disinclined to seek a proper answer to these questions, then the SFA will dodge the bullet.
Thus my question to Campbellsmoney: do individual (or groups of) shareholders have locus to seek legal redress here?
Going at it in that fashion may even force Celtic and other clubs for that matter to come on board.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
I don’t know is the answer, but I doubt it. You see its not a question of law really. Its not a proper court – its a made up thing by a private body.
_________________________________________________________________

I meant a challenge in law. For example, is there a framework whereby a shareholder(s) of a club(s) could challenge the outcome?

It does seem rather odd that, if a most people here believe, RFC achieved honours dishonestly and in doing so denied other clubs prize-money and opportunity that those clubs are reluctant to seek redress.

My guess I that the must have something to lose by bringing that up – but what?

Is there a mechanism through which the SFA/SPL could be sued by individual shareholders for loss of earnings caused by a lack of proper regulation by the governing bodies.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Kicker Conspiracy

Double click or tap on the TU and it will change your vote πŸ™‚


About the author

Avatar