Podcast Episode 2 – Stuart Cosgrove

By

AuldheidAuldheid says: Friday, February 28, 2014 at 00:25 john clarke says: Thursday, February …

Comment on Podcast Episode 2 – Stuart Cosgrove by bogsdollox.

AuldheidAuldheid says:
Friday, February 28, 2014 at 00:25

john clarke says:

Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 23:55

This is were folks like you come in. There must be a follow up from others asking H&M or the clubs each support and/or the addresses what they intend to do about the letter and Annexes.

The other thing is to open the comments section to get that moving. Probably an oversight as TSFM has been very busy dealing with consequences of the DOS attack.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’m assuming the Annexes include Charlotte material re CO’s caught red handedness signing off the Wee Tax Case shenanigans.

Once the Appendices are published on here I will write to Leanne at Fir Park asking for the Clubs views.

bogsdollox Also Commented

Podcast Episode 2 – Stuart Cosgrove
parnnoyed says:
Friday, February 28, 2014 at 00:54

“The values Rangers Football Club is famous for, and proud to honour, include professionalism, integrity and honesty. ”

Out of all the lies and deceit this must rank as the highest(sorry, lowest) they could stoop.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On the subject of untruths BFDJ was able to say on SSB tonight that when he signed for Rangers the second time he did not know they had a sectarian signing policy. I personally will take his word for it.


Podcast Episode 2 – Stuart Cosgrove
easyJambo says:
Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 18:23

The tribunal resumes at 9.30am tomorrow.

I won’t be free to go back until the middle of next week, which might be interesting as Andrew Thornhill should be defending the FTT outcome.

On a general point I found some periods pretty tedious as Roddy T rambled along ….. with his monotone voice …… which made it ever so easy to drift away…… as he repeated long bits from transcripted conversations at the FTT with various witnesses ……. and flipped from one binder of documents to another .…. so much so that one of his own legal team closed his eyes for ten minutes or so ….. then even Lord Doherty couldn’t conceal a yawn…….. get my drift?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dreary but vital that Roddy T makes the UTT take notice of the evidence glossed over by the FTT numpties.

Excellent reporting by yourself and Jean – when does Thornhill take the stage? I might pop through for his show as he’s quite a turn. Are youse allowed to take popcorn into the Court?


Podcast Episode 2 – Stuart Cosgrove
andy graham (@andygraham66) says:
Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 14:10
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Interesting – at last they have some semblance of unity, a realisation that they are being ripped off, a new/old saviour and recognition that JI’s role is and was always to divide the fans. At last they have woken up to understand the solution is in their own hands

Unity is strength and Cash is Kings as they used to say in the old days.


Recent Comments by bogsdollox

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
I’d estimate King’s exposure as between £2m-£4m.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’d estimate it at 12 months in the pokey.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Cluster OneDecember 22, 2017 at 21:24
BOGS DOLLOXDECEMBER 22, 2017 at 21:00 There must be institutional investors who would grab the 20p because they need to make some sort of recovery on their initial investment.I bet there are a few individual investors who are a bit cheesed off with Dave. ————– Is there anyone left who may have 1p shares from the start? 19p profit right there
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Didn’t the 1 pees later buy in for the same number of shares at a higher value thus making their average price paid much higher?

It’s a no brainer for the non emotionally involved at 20p.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HomunculusDecember 22, 2017 at 20:42
Just one thing that confuses me.
If people are claiming that the shares are currently trading at 27p, it’s a nonsense but just for the sake of the question.
Do they think that if they double the number of shares available then they will stay at the same price.
It’s a share in a business ffs, surely if there are more of them issued then each one is worth less (or worthless in this case).
So let’s say here’s the scenario. You have shares in a business worth say 14p each. The business is making losses, every year. It’s £16m in debt, and admitting it’s going to lose more this year, and next. Predictions are of the business being £23m in debt, at least. It’s also a toxic brand, operating in a field (pardon the pun) which traditionally does not make money.
Someone comes along and offers you 20p for your shares, no questions asked, no haggling, a straight 20p a share.
You knock this back … really. 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There must be institutional investors who would grab the 20p because they need to make some sort of recovery on their initial investment.
I bet there are a few individual investors who are a bit cheesed off with Dave.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
essexbeancounterDecember 22, 2017 at 20:28
Bogs Dollox StevieBCDecember 22, 2017 at 18:29Guess that the CoS result could /should trigger a couple of events in the short-term;– King resigns from RIFC & – the auditors Campbell Dallas ‘do walking away’ ?You would think…?  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Their reputation is on the line. I would think ICAS practice regulation are keeping a close watch on this one._______________________________________________________ ICAS Practice Regulation only get upset when recalcitrant, (no, not “concomitant”) members, like me, fail to return meaningless checklists or forms in time. Please believe me…I have “got form” in this area…. Only when a serious complaint from “members of the public” is received, would any notice be taken…and minimum action result… Please remember, that ICAS members, at least 20 in number, have been involved in this whole RFC/MIH/TRFC/TRIFC omnishambles over the last 20 years or so….and….yup…a big fat zilch from the “public”… I rest my case….
_____________________________________________
Is it possible to complain anonymously? Or is it necessary to leave the country soon after complaining about “accounting concerns” ?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Cluster OneDecember 22, 2017 at 20:18
SANNOFFYMESSSOITIZZDECEMBER 22, 2017 at 18:42 2 0 Rate This https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/2017/12/22/sevco-prepares-for-a-post-king-scenario/ ——————– Wow! they want the ex -city trader to be understanding about his severance claim. ————- Mr king has already stated this matter had been delt with.Or was this glib and shamless lier not telling the truth once again
_____________________________________________________
This is like fending of HMRC in the days when 1872 was a club.

Back then the chat to the HMRC was “Look guys can you hold off for a bit from chasing the Wee Tax Case liability because new owners have taken over and we need some time to sort it all out – youse will get your doh!”
I recall the Daily Record often insisted Mark Warburton was a really smart guy.


About the author