Podcast Episode 3 – David Low

By

Hector says: May 5, 2014 at 10:47 am See question 4 – …

Comment on Podcast Episode 3 – David Low by justbecauseyoureparanoid.

hector says:
May 5, 2014 at 10:47 am

See question 4 – the return of “quantum” !!!!!!!! 🙄

justbecauseyoureparanoid Also Commented

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
John Clark @ 12.14am

John I hope with every fibre in my being that you are correct.
Not that I believe for a second that it will lead to any retrospective action against the team in liquidation nor for that matter any significant change in stance by the laptop loyal
However it would provide official confirmation of something that should have been obvious to a blind man, that every team, not just Celtic, were playing against a loaded deck
Not just the honest mistakes, but pure unadulterated cheating
I spent many years travelling every other week from Yorkshire with my son to watch a league which was only ever allowed to be won by one team
It hurts to this day, especially the Tommy Burns year, three amigos, Jim Farry and all
It would be a thing of beauty to have a simple statement that said they cheated us all


Recent Comments by justbecauseyoureparanoid

Accountability via Transparency.
paddy malarkey 24th June 2019 at 12:50

 

I think you'll find it would be different club = not one of "ra peepul" = threat to national security.


Accountability via Transparency.
https://twitter.com/katiewhyatt/status/1139949141398827008?s=21

A bit more on the smaller goals for women discussion. 


Accountability via Transparency.
Bogs Dollox 14th June 2019 at 14:08

 

Fair points.

I also remember a few years someone suggested reducing teams to 10 a side rather than 11.

The thinking behind this was that the immense improvements in athleticism and overall fitness levels had led to teams being able to run further and faster that in the past. As a result an average team could just depend in depth and chase things down for 90 minutes.

The 10 a side proponents argued that this would open up some space on the pitch which should be an advantage to more skilful players and maybe more goals.

Naturally nothing happened.


Accountability via Transparency.
John Clark 14th June 2019 at 12:53

 

I can't say for sure but I believe it was felt that such a move would only serve to play into the hands of those who want to undermine the status of the women's game.


Accountability via Transparency.
John Clark 14th June 2019 at 12:08

my understanding is that there has been some discussion about a slight reduction in the overall size of the goals but the women’s game has rejected this.


About the author