Podcast Episode 5 – Hibs Takeover ?

By

The Cat NR1 says: September 8, 2014 at 2:56 pm A picture …

Comment on Podcast Episode 5 – Hibs Takeover ? by blu.

The Cat NR1 says:
September 8, 2014 at 2:56 pm

A picture of Wallace and Nash stood alone on the edge of a cliff looking down and saying to each other, “I think we called that on wrong” is forming in my mind.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is that before or after a good night out, paid for by their hefty bonus cheque? These guys knew they were dealing with a basket-case when they took their jobs on, that’s why they’re bizarrely highly paid for leading a company with an annual turnover and footfall lower than Govan ASDA. How much does the manager there earn a year?

blu Also Commented

Podcast Episode 5 – Hibs Takeover ?
Gym Trainer says:
September 8, 2014 at 9:52 am
==========================================
Gym, re. SA tax laws on foreign investment – How many assessments of evasion were cited by SARS – 322? I wonder if the deal King cut when pleading guilty on 41 counts of tax evasion allowed him to retain some of the assets he’d off-shored. It’s clear that he’s just as devious and rapacious as the other players in this filleting of football fans money from their pockets. Don’t write him off, even if he should be banned from being a director of a company in this country.


Podcast Episode 5 – Hibs Takeover ?
The end date of the TMs vary, some are renewable others may not be. That doesn’t tell us the licencing period for each though.

A list of the various TMs here:

http://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmownerid/search?domain=1&id=267202&app=0&mark=UK00002226670


Podcast Episode 5 – Hibs Takeover ?
Ryan, Rhapsodyinblue,

There’s no doubt that some on here can’t control themselves and the mods are consequently tough on the cheap shots.

However, the Rangers TV interview where McCoist demanded, “Who are these people” was cynical exploitation of the dumber Rangers supporters and undoubtedly caused distress to the tribunal members who gave of their own time to help Scottish football apply the rules that all clubs agreed to. Neepheid’s question is a fair one – what would these three men’s view of McCoist have been when they were being briefed by police on security for them and their families? Remember, he knew exactly who these people were, this was a set interview with an in-house media service, not a spontaneous reaction to a microphone being stuck in front of him.

Self-serving – £800,000 a year for strolling past teams whose players practically pay to play when the club you profess to love is bust?


Recent Comments by blu

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
I seem to recall that part of Dave King’s settlement with the South African Revenue Service was a  requirement that Mr King’s family repatriate business assets held overseas into South Africa. Has anyone any insight into how this sits with NOAL being BVI-based?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
easyJamboDecember 20, 2017 at 12:44
EJ, I’ve no cause to doubt you or Hearts directors or the company auditors. It’s a fact though that people will speculate on these matters, often getting things completely wrong, intentionally or simply through ignorance.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One

easyJamboDecember 20, 2017 at 11:23

blu December 20, 2017 at 11:16 There is an element of truth in Tangoed’s assertion about the need for transparency though – I’m sure there’s plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback as to the identity of the mysterious benefactors. ===================== There is indeed plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback about the benefactor(s).
A couple of well informed posters have all but confirmed that the money has come from partners in an Edinburgh investment company.

EJ,
I’m sure that you and others closer to the club will have a very good idea who these people are but as long as the club is asked to keep their identities private there will be speculation and aspersions cast from the east of Edinburgh and further afield.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One

HomunculusDecember 20, 2017 at 10:57
I’ll decline from commenting further, the majority of members here seem to think it is acceptable to conjecture that Hearts are being funded by the proceeds of crime.

For the avoidance of doubt Homunculus, I agree with your challenge to Tangoed – his subsequent response confirms it is simple speculation, possibly mischievous. My question was more focused on what might be considered as money laundering, tangential and less important than your challenge.
There is an element of truth in Tangoed’s assertion about the need for transparency though – I’m sure there’s plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback as to the identity of the mysterious benefactors.
 


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Homunculus, I don’t think that money laundering was referred to by Tangoed, no doubt they’ll respond to fully explain.


About the author