Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma

By

@wottpi as long as the Ref is reasonably accurate and …

Comment on Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma by tykebhoy.

@wottpi as long as the Ref is reasonably accurate and consistent for both teams throughout the match I don’t think it matters too much and its always going to have a degree inaccuracy until they come up with a hand held theodolite πŸ˜‰

Another thing the foam highlights is the lack of application of the law on several levels.

Although it is fairly obvious if the ball is moved back in theory the smaller arc should be a circle completely round the ball as the attacking team can not increase the distance to the wall by movnig the ball back. Similarly its a 10 yard radius that the defence should retreat. I’m not advocating a 62+ yard circumference is marked but when, usually a forward, is standing a couple of yards behind the kick he/she is guilty of encroachment especially if they then becomes active by challenging the recipient of a short pass. This is something I see in almost every game I watch.

tykebhoy Also Commented

Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma
@ yourhavingalaugh

I could be proved wrong but I suspect UEFA are taking very little notice at all about the Omnishambles and will accept TRFC so long as the SFA grant a licence. Of course the SFA may be a little more cautious courtesy of Auldheid et al’s work on the back of Resolution 12 (Celtic AGM) and UEFA being aware might not as readily accept the SFA submission ………..


Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma
@neepheid maybe he’s expecting people to be not readily forthcoming with evidence requested πŸ˜‰ after all RFC(IL) have previous for this even when being run by court appointed officials (D&P).

I don’t have the background to know but I can’t see the court case taking 5 years to prepare and run but there are already suggestions that there will be an awful lot of evidence to be presented. That plus the possible ramifications, which may require civil cases, depending on the outcome could see the pantomime still run for some time yet. The pantomime is the omnishambles regarding the assets and who owns what not the legal process which is to be taken seriously.


Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma
scottc says:
Member:
September 6, 2015 at 9:54 am
================
Now I know that I can also say I got one correct that strictly wasn’t but was the best of the two options given. It asked in a penalty shoot out where must a player stand after taking his penalty. The options were ‘anywhere on the field’ and ‘in the centre circle’. While it is usually applied as on/behind the halfway line across most of the field even if it is as per the SFA’s 2nd option it doesn’t apply to all players. Pedantic I know but goalkeepers do take penalties and unless its the last they certainly don’t return to anywhere near the centre circle.


Recent Comments by tykebhoy

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
On the companies house share allotment document.  Although it doesn’t state “working days” shirley any processing is manual and therefore the 5 days exclude today, yesterday and possibly Friday?  That would also rule out tomorrow and Tuesday from the count.

On the JP Jenkins page re RIFC.  I am pretty certain that the 50,000 trade is earlier than October and is the most recent.  Regardless I don’t think the recent trades changed in October and definitely haven’t in November and December.  It should be noted though that JP Jenkins will only likely report trades done through them where buyer and seller are originally unaware of each other.  Private purchases/trades can happen without going through JP Jenkins if the purchaser knows independently the seller wants rid.  The MASH/Mike Ashley sale to Barry Scott/Club 2012 did not appear on there allegedly because the sale price was inflated as part of the deal to renegotiate the retail deal.  Any purchase of shares by AJ from DCK or any other board member would similarly avoid the need of the middleman JP Jenkins. 


Small Price to Pay?
The SFA “get out” is the claim they have no jurisdiction over the chair of a PLC that just happens to own a football club.  I think the English FA can teach them a thing or two about that.  Birmingham. Leeds and Blackburn being recent examples.  


Small Price to Pay?
It looks like Nottingham Forest may start rethinkinking their interim appointment 07

FWIW My take on last night’s statement is rhat it was pulished by someone known to have had prior access to the website.  As PMGB might say “Peace be upon him”.  I can’t believe the CEO had any part in it and for that reason I suspect we may see a real resignation soon which may also be joined by 2 of the 3 bears.  This has all the hallmarks of a “Glib” production with Gilligan and Murray minor riding shotgun.  There may be some High Level obsfucation in attempted damage limitation but I think the damage is now well and truly done.  Not even a RRM would give up current gainful employment to pick up the poisoned chalice.


Good Try Mr. McKenzie
Jimbo 19:36

I’m with Cluster One’s response on the Radar asking serious questions.

I think you are correct Zadok is only heard from the group stages.

I don’t think it is only Miller but Wallace himself who will be retired long before, if ever,  an entity playing out of Ibrox will be anywhere near CL Group stages or even qualifiers.


The Day I was on the Scotland U-23 Bench
JusticesLord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge
Hearing start date15 Mar 2017
Hearing finish date16 Mar 2017
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0073.html


About the author