SFM – The Next Steps


Today’s herald is boak inducing. Graeme MacPhersons article is a …

Comment on SFM – The Next Steps by dom16.

Today’s herald is boak inducing. Graeme MacPhersons article is a work of wonder.

Ally being asked via the media to help out – ie for the good of the club give up your contractual rights. Then various moonbeams – where have I seen these before? – on SD, envy of Europe blah blah


dom16 Also Commented

SFM – The Next Steps
Oh dear. Poor Chris Jack has been on the sauce again in his latest breathless piece on matters sevco

“Kings ransom on the line” headline. Not one mention of king actually putting any money in. Essence seems to be that rangers need to spend lots and lots of money and expect losses so they can “get to where they want to be- premiership champions and competing in Europe – will take time and investment” no sh@t Chris

SFM – The Next Steps
Oh dear. Herald to on full volume of why lack of Rangers in the premier league is a disaster for Scottish football. And get Paul Lambert to fire the bullets “if I was a Celtic player I would want my strongest rivals to be in the league because you need that” he does go on to say they have to earn the right to be there

Thought it was pretty straight forward. Rangers didn’t progress due to sporting reasons. What other options does the MSM suggest the leagues use instead?

SFM – The Next Steps
Fantastic examination of QPR finances. What a basket case!


Recent Comments by dom16

Questions, questions, questions
Michael Stewart tweeting an apology to Jim Traynor from BBC programme in 2020.

If it’s a result of legal action, seems an odd way to apologise.

Anyone know why this and why now?

Questions, questions, questions
Useful analysis of Neil McCanns HMRC judgement.


Does make me wonder why people on such significant income levels seek ways to avoid paying tax.

Questions, questions, questions
What an odd weekend.

Matt Lyndsey writing drivel on how VAR would have The Rangers 1 point ahead simultaneously avoiding any scrutiny of other controversial decisions in matches with Motherwell and Aberdeen.

I wonder how VAR would have impacted yesterdays semi final match where some “robust” challenges went unpunished?

Questions, questions, questions

Questions, questions, questions

You raise some interesting questions regarding behaviour at a night club and a football stadium.

The night club is subject to the Licensing Scotland Act 2005 and the features of this Act are quite heavy for any licensed premises.

They are responsible for behaviour of patrons outside the premises. Regular police activity at the premises will result in a hearing at the licensing Board.

Certainly behaviour inside the premises is part of the license. It’s illegal to serve a drunk person. They must be refused. Staff must be trained. CCTV must be available. Police have right of entry as do licensing standards officers.

As with outside problems, any breach of license discovered by police or LSO results in report to Board.

I’m aware of premises in Falkirk being required to ticket and have door stewards for football games on TV.

Why similar requirements can’t be imposed on football stadia is a question that the Scottish govt needs to answer.

About the author