Still a Battle for Survival

By

Not The Huddle Malcontent says: September 10, 2012 at 17:52 but overall, …

Comment on Still a Battle for Survival by Blindsummit.

Not The Huddle Malcontent says:

September 10, 2012 at 17:52

but overall, the SPL/SFL/SFA have played an absolute BLINDER here – in so much as they have made a total mess of it all, RFC are going to haunt them until they are all removed from office.

if they don’t sort this out in 2 days by simply removing sevcos SFA license (failing to meet the agreements to pay football debts and co-operate with dual contract investigation) then they are about to end professional football in scotland

congratualtions
_______________________________________________________________
I believe that you have nailed it sir.
The only credible response to the statement is to withdraw the SFA membership and licence to play football. Any other response or lack of one, confirms that sevco now run Scottish football and are untouchable.

SR and ND, and your handlers. Total amateurs. You created a monster and it’s now on the rampage. Well done. You’ve killed Scottish football and significantly damaged it’s civil society as part of the fallout.

Blindsummit Also Commented

Still a Battle for Survival
timtim says:

———–
No,QP played in 2 FA cup finals both v Blackburn Rovers and lost them both
_______________________________________________________________

Oh, Ok thanks timtim, I never knew that. Appreciate the info.


Still a Battle for Survival
johnnym says:

September 10, 2012 at 18:08

I know UEFA have been appearing to steer clear of this mess but shirley they can’t allow titles to be ‘bought’ ….well not in that sense anyway….otherwise anyone fancy being the first scottish club to win the FA cup? just make Portsmouth an offer.
________________________________________________________

OT I know, but didn’t Queens Park win it? Just wondering.


Still a Battle for Survival
That statement. Wow. Just….wow…..


Recent Comments by Blindsummit

Make our Mind Up Time
smallteaser says:

I think your thoughts are misplaced here.
Any charge on Turnbull Hutton would be behind closed doors, both the trubunal and all evidence and rebuttal would never see the light of day, only the verdict would be published.
Therefore complete waste of time, there would be no defence required by the SFA or the SPL.
The last tribunal of Rangers & Craig Whyte had a specific remit, never published, it went to a tribunal, who never saw any of the evidence, cover up after cover up for the last 8 months.
___________________________________________________________

Hmmm. Good point st, which I didn’t think of. And difficult to complain about, as that confidentiality, particularly for the panel identity, was supposed to be a key element of the process.
It begs the question of course, what if he was charged and found not gulity?
All a moot-point now as it seems unlikely that he will be charged. For his sake I’m glad, as I have had some personal contact with him and he’s a fine gentleman. It saddens me that spivs such as Charles Green can have such influence in the game, rather than people like Mr Hutton.


Make our Mind Up Time
Three things:
Firstly, I’d like to thank TSFM and the administrators of this site for their efforts to get this forum up and running and in keeping it going. This involves a substantial input of personal time on their part, and I would like them to know that I appreciate it. This site is vital if we are ever to stand any hope of reforming the mess that is Scottish Football. If we had a fully functioning independant media of course we wouldn’t be here, but here we very much are, until no longer needed.

Secondly, to those who don’t like the rules and conditions imposed to be a contributor to this site, I would suggest you find somewhere else to post where the rules suit you. No one is forced to take part and the moderators have every right to apply such conditions as they see fit. It’s their effort that makes the site possible in the first place. So either live by the rules or apply your right to personal freedom or choice and go elsewhere. Perhaps start your own blog? Let’s all remember as well that this is a relatively new site, and as such is still finding its way and there are bound to be teething problems till the right balance is found.

Thirdly:When Turnbull Hutton made his comments on the steps of Hampden, i fervently hoped he’d be charged by the SFA. Why? Not because I believe he was actually guilty, but because he spoke the truth. Because the lickspittles in the SFA would have been forced to defend their actions in the Rangers debacle in a judicial environment. In effect they and the SPL would have been on trial and not the redoubtable Mr Hutton. The fact they didn’t charge him speaks volumes. He would have torn them to shreds.


Charles Green – What Will Football’s Authorities Do?
Apologies for clogging up the board. I just want to test my posting since signing up to WordPress. i’ve had to select the name Blindsummit63 as blindsummit was already taken on WordPress.


Charles Green – What Will Football’s Authorities Do?
The suggestion that Celtic (or any other club) should be responsible for scrutinizing the accounts of Rangers (or any other club) is one of the most risible and infantile pieces of flimflammery yet from Jabba.

And I say that as a Hibs fan, with no love lost in the past for Celtic. Since Rangers’ nefarious deeds have become exposed though, I have warmed much more to Celtic and their fans represented on here and RTC previously. I once saw Celtic as just the other side of the coin from Rangers, but I was wrong and am happy to admit it. They have carried out their business honestly and within the rules unlike Rangers (and now their tribute club successors Sevco).

I have followed with great interest the debate amongs the esteemed contributors of this site of a Celtic persuasion, about whether their club should be speaking out on Sevco, or whether their silence is a correct.

My opinion is that they are almost certainly correct to hold their counsel. It’s not their job, as just one of many clubs, to lead the others in a moral charge against Sevco. Equally, it would be unfair to single Celtic out for blame for Sevco’s continued survival and the corruption in the SFA and SPL that enables it. I believe that all SPL clubs share that ignominy, my own included. they ALL are silently supporting what’s going on.

So, quite frankly it’s not Celtic’s job to “lead” Scottish football and they would be damned by many if they did try. We are all supposed to be “equals”. (except Sevco obviously, who are not bound by the same rules as us mere mortals).

But where I think Celtic should be speaking out is when they have been specifically wronged or targetted by Sevco. For me this includes one specific example.

1. If Celtic have not yet been paid footballing debts owed to them by Sevco/old Rangers then I believe they should make that public as Dundee united have.

i’d love to know the truth there.


Charles Green – What Will Football’s Authorities Do?
john clarke says:

Yes, Eb, it used to irritate the hell out of me ( like ‘dove’ as in ‘he dove in the water’) until I discovered that those versions of the past participle were fairly standard usage in the English spoken by the Pilgrim Fathers, and taken to America, and fossilised.( We still have words such as ‘forgotten’ and ‘begotten’).

Much more irritating is that rising inflection at the end of a sentence that turns a simple statement into a question?

I’m not sure whether that’s of Australian origin, but I detest it, and would not allow even my servants to use it!
___________________________________________________________
Apologies for going OT, but Bill Bryson’s Made In America is an entertaining read on the development (or not indeed) of the English language in America. It surprised me to learn that in many ways English in America more closely reflects the old English of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries than UK speech.


About the author