Still a Battle for Survival

By

Iki says: September 10, 2012 at 19:17 The phantom ThumbsDowner appears …

Comment on Still a Battle for Survival by smallteaser.

iki says:
September 10, 2012 at 19:17

The phantom ThumbsDowner appears on the scene.
============================================
It’s very quick as well.!!

smallteaser Also Commented

Still a Battle for Survival
Auldheid says:
September 10, 2012 at 20:27

I think Celtic are holding there counsel, publicly because it would cost them fans.
No matter what statement they come out with, they along with every other club in Scotland, are complicit in this.
From the attempt to get them into the SPL, to the refusal by the SFL for a vote of no confidence, they are all complicit.
Chickens are coming home to roost and we have all been done over “for the good of Scottish football” of course


Still a Battle for Survival
When is THE Rangers not Rangers?
When Charlie G says so.
Check Charlies statement, 9 times he mentions the word NEW, why then was a transfer of membership given by the SFA?, why was there no vote on another club getting entry to the SFL?


Still a Battle for Survival
Duff & Phelps
““This has been communicated to the SPL and considering that further involvement in this matter is not in the interests of its creditors, RFC 2012 PLC will have no further involvement with the Commission.”
========================================================================
Does this mean that D & D will not supply any documentation pertaining to players contracts or registration details??
Does the onus now fall on the SFA to provide the copies of the said documents??
Will they all still be available.?
The good news is that without any defence from either RFC this should be finished very quickly.


Recent Comments by smallteaser

Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM says:
September 21, 2012 at 09:46
0 0 i Rate This

———————————————————————————————–
Again thats your personal viewpoint, you are calling yourself The Scottish Football Monitor but the comments you post as such are personal, and going by last nights posts not always reflective of the site called The Scottish Football Monitor.
__________________________________________________________________

smallteaser – and you call yourself that
I’m fairly confident that what I said was fairly “reflective” of opinion on the blog. If it transpired that it was not, there would be little point in hanging around.
————————————————————————————-

I guess what you are saying here is that anyone who disagreed with your point of view, either on the banner issue last night, or in fact anything else you say, should really leave the blog?
The blog appeared to be split 50/50 last night so I don’t agree that your comments were reflective of the blog as a whole.
Should I stay or should I go? Is there any point in “hanging around”?


Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM says:
September 21, 2012 at 09:22

You can ask, but I won’t be posting under two aliases. There is no conflict as far as I can see.
———————————————————————————————–
Again thats your personal viewpoint, you are calling yourself The Scottish Football Monitor but the comments you post as such are personal, and going by last nights posts not always reflective of the site called The Scottish Football Monitor.


Make our Mind Up Time
TSFM, may I ask where you are posting your own point of view rather than the overall viewpoint of a moderator of TSFM you post under a different name.
If you use the TSFM for posting personal comments then that may be construed as the view of the whole site, which it may not be.


Make our Mind Up Time
Danish Pastry says:
September 21, 2012 at 08:44

So it’s to be Adidas next season? All shaping up nicely for potential shareholders. I wonder if any of the shareholders in old Rangers will be buying a stake in the new? It would seem pointless since Charles insists it’s the same Rangers. And that must be true, you can tell by glints in t’eyes

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-chief-charles-green-set-1335458
———————————————————————————————————-
41 points posted on CG’s Canadian speech yesterday most of which are lies and can be picked holes in and the DR goes with this one!!! Yet another bit of positive spin. I wonder if they asked how much it was worth…..sorry could be worth, doesn’t look like it.
Maybe they asked Adidas how they felt….. doesn’t look like it.

http://forweonlyknow.wordpress.com/


Make our Mind Up Time
RayCharles says:

September 21, 2012 at 04:12
Just as an aside. In a classic piece of whatabouery:

A banner saying “Paedo Free in Div 3″ was unveiled at a ground recently.

I do not find it offensive although many will.
————————————————————–
As there was no caricature of anyone wearing team colours it could have been meant for anyone, why would you take offence??


About the author