THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight


STEVIEBCMAY 2, 2017 at 03:05  If not already mentioned. According to an …

Comment on THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight by Corrupt official.

STEVIEBCMAY 2, 2017 at 03:05 
If not already mentioned.
According to an infamous TRFC forum, Keef was told he was no longer welcome at Ibrox or Murray Park – last Friday.
Interesting if true
   For “Banned” Stevie, read “Flag of convenience” The BBC fly under the same flag. …Captain Hornblower disguised as a whaler. 

Corrupt official Also Commented

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
UPTHEHOOPSMAY 12, 2017 at 07:01
Tweet yesterday from Alex Thomson of Channel 4 News. Several people on his Timeline ask him to expand but he says no more
@alextomo It seems the Scottish FA say Rangers will not be stripped of titles whatever Supreme Court’s Big Tax Case verdict might be. 
   I’m not sure if Tomo is referring to anything fresh UTH, but perhaps may be referring to something historical. 
   He doesn’t so much appear to be implying to a direct quote or statement made recently from anybody. 
   It may be the case that something relating to this blog by ecojon has crossed his bows.

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
STEVIEBCMAY 11, 2017 at 15:02
Just a general observation, about life in general. 
I am thinking that a duped person can actually be the ‘duper’ ?
And that mibbees, sometimes, the wrong person can appear in a dock?
Generally speaking.
   In such a general situation the duping could quite easily be by mutual consent,  in a wider duping blu-haha

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
STEVIEBCMAY 8, 2017 at 18:53
  I’m not sure if with the publicity, sponsorship, etc, they are contractually obliged to provide a presence  but at the very least they are falling down on sportsmanship, and presenting the game in a positive light, and in doing so making themselves look childish and…well, nasty. 
   Would they have snubbed the awards if they sniffed a potential season ticket boosting award?..We will never know.
   As you say there would have been no harm in providing some form of presence, even if the first team were on lock-down 
   I suspect there is more to it than that, and it is more to do with them flexing muscles they don’t have, over some political maneuverings in the back-ground. 
   Maybe they were told not to invade the stage or start singing…08  No !
   Or maybe they feared a damn good goading. 15 
  Was big Jozo there?  02

Recent Comments by Corrupt official

Questions, questions, questions
The BBC (holding company) and salaries.

Questions, questions, questions

Questions, questions, questions
Vernallen 2nd April 2022 At 16:30
10Rate This

Would the Club 1872 evidence of serious wrong doing by the board have similar weight to the dossier assembled by the Rangers in regards to the SFPL/SFA a while back
That is always a possibility Vernallen, but there is one subtle difference. One set of allegations did not achieve its objective, whereas the other did.

Questions, questions, questions
John Clark 2nd April 2022 At 12:36

Yes, CO, I’m inclined to believe so.

A dark place right enough John. I believe every fan-base on the planet would be demanding the release of documentary evidence supporting such allegations, whether they went to Australia or not. It’s the casual acceptance of the fan-base, that this is the normal way of things in the Sevco boardroom that gets me.
Albertz may point out that there is a falling membership, but for a while it was large, and stocking it with vast sums of hard earned cash…..However they appear to have lost their tongues.
It really is a sad indictment of those fans that they are not demanding, “Get it oot anyway!”

Questions, questions, questions
So fan group, Club 1872 claim to have evidence of serious wrong doing, but are happy to keep quiet about it, and keep it under their hat, if they get their own way…….Is that where we are now in Govan?..

About the author