THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight


GUNNERBMAY 11, 2017 at 23:23       3 Votes  BIG PINKMAY 11, 2017 at …

Comment on THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight by Cluster One.

GUNNERBMAY 11, 2017 at 23:23       3 Votes 
BIG PINKMAY 11, 2017 at 22:01_______________________I suppose some may see this and pass it on to others. Change dns settings to google dns servers or
suppose some may not have a clue how to go about that18

Cluster One Also Commented

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
HOMUNCULUSMAY 13, 2017 at 07:59
I love the bit where
Rangers had to be punished, they deserved to be punished.
Celtic fans or their club didn’t attempt to influence the outcome of debates on Rangers and possible sanctions.
This club accepted their sanctions and moved on.
Word of advice gentlemen. From now on be very careful when talking or writing about this club. (moved on indeed)
To go from deserved to be punished(But never mentions what the punishment was rangers got ) to then go on and say, the club accepted their sanctions
it’s as if he has no clue what he is talking about.just a rant and a few coupled together soundbites

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I was David’s senior partner in the funding,and he would come to me from time to time.
Did Mr Murray not say Mr king was a few doors away and never dropped by to ask questions or something like that when he was a witness last week.

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
One thing we have learned about the CW court case over the last week or so is that the witnesses “Don’t Recall” much.
You would believe that when the witnesses recieved  a letter to appear as a witness, a bit of revision could have been sought.It is after all as i believe i have heard it say it’s one of the biggest trials in scottish history.It’s not as if they have not had a constant reminder of what happened

Recent Comments by Cluster One

Who Is Conning Whom?
ALLYJAMBODECEMBER 8, 2017 at 11:27
and the only suggestion that the job might have been too big for him has come from a representative of TRFC, a source that clearly didn’t think it was too big for him until he turned it down.
So true.

Who Is Conning Whom?
By the way; Sevco, MASSIVE, by what measure ?
massive(ˈmӕsiv) adjectivehuge or heavy. a massive building; a massive burden of taxation. massief, enorm ضَخْم، كَبير масивен maciço masivní; těžký massiv massiv; enorm ογκώδηςenorme, monumental
MASSIVE, by what measure ?….Laughter over these last years. No other club comes close.

Who Is Conning Whom?
JOHN CLARKDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 22:32
Sack Level5 ( are they still the PR outfit? I’ve lost track?) but sack whoever wrote that statement, would be my advice
Michael Stewart@mstewart_23 Insinuating that Derek is not ready for the job really is a jilted lovers response. This whole episode does not look good for Rangers.
Level 5. what a wast of money that could be spent on getting a manager.
Ps do the ibrox fans ever question just how much their cash strapped club spend on Level5 getting it wrong all the time?

Who Is Conning Whom?
EASYJAMBODECEMBER 7, 2017 at 20:17
Thanks for clarification,and the fact my old memory box is still working….kind off22

Who Is Conning Whom?
FAN OF FOOTBALLDECEMBER 7, 2017 at 19:55 0 0 Rate This
From CG on the offical  site 2012
CHARLES GREEN has expressed his anger and dismay at the timing of the verdict of the First Tier Tax Tribunal as it has massively affected the current status of Rangers.It was finally revealed last week that Rangers had won the tax case brought by HMRC in relation to Employee Benefit Trusts used during the reign of Sir David Murray for a number of players and some staff.Despite a concerted campaign from certain quarters, which was often hateful, that decided that Rangers were guilty of “cheating” it has been proved that is not the case.The most important aspect of it all, however, is that had this verdict been delivered in May or June then Rangers would:Still be a member of the SPL.
Still be a member of the SPL….Oh dear
All from CG on the offical  site 2012

About the author