THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight


UPTHEHOOPSMAY 12, 2017 at 07:01 Tweet yesterday from Alex Thomson of …

Comment on THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight by Corrupt official.

UPTHEHOOPSMAY 12, 2017 at 07:01
Tweet yesterday from Alex Thomson of Channel 4 News. Several people on his Timeline ask him to expand but he says no more
@alextomo It seems the Scottish FA say Rangers will not be stripped of titles whatever Supreme Court’s Big Tax Case verdict might be. 
   I’m not sure if Tomo is referring to anything fresh UTH, but perhaps may be referring to something historical. 
   He doesn’t so much appear to be implying to a direct quote or statement made recently from anybody. 
   It may be the case that something relating to this blog by ecojon has crossed his bows.

Corrupt official Also Commented

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
STEVIEBCMAY 11, 2017 at 15:02
Just a general observation, about life in general. 
I am thinking that a duped person can actually be the ‘duper’ ?
And that mibbees, sometimes, the wrong person can appear in a dock?
Generally speaking.
   In such a general situation the duping could quite easily be by mutual consent,  in a wider duping blu-haha

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
STEVIEBCMAY 8, 2017 at 18:53
  I’m not sure if with the publicity, sponsorship, etc, they are contractually obliged to provide a presence  but at the very least they are falling down on sportsmanship, and presenting the game in a positive light, and in doing so making themselves look childish and…well, nasty. 
   Would they have snubbed the awards if they sniffed a potential season ticket boosting award?..We will never know.
   As you say there would have been no harm in providing some form of presence, even if the first team were on lock-down 
   I suspect there is more to it than that, and it is more to do with them flexing muscles they don’t have, over some political maneuverings in the back-ground. 
   Maybe they were told not to invade the stage or start singing…08  No !
   Or maybe they feared a damn good goading. 15 
  Was big Jozo there?  02

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
Building bridges.

Recent Comments by Corrupt official

Who Is Conning Whom?
    Would it have been less embarrassing for the Sevco statement to merely have iterated. “Sorry, but we’re skint!”

Who Is Conning Whom?
DBD….Don’t you want to discover who killed your club and how?. (Because the simple fact you dismiss, is that Yes!..It did die !) Don’t you want to know who assisted them, have them exposed, and removed from office, or prosecuted if warranted?. Don’t you want rules, and governance to prevent it happening again?
   No need for a glass door to see some folk coming.

Who Is Conning Whom?
   I hear Sevco will be sending out a strong message at the AGM

Enough is enough
   “The club” can never be defined by SFA membership…The club existed before the existence of the SFA. The SFA may very well have granted another club a membership, as a vacancy had arisen, but it was still granted to another club. 
   It could easily have been the wheeltappers and shunters, or Club biscuits, but in this case it was Sevco Scotland. 
   As everyone but bare-faced liars know, a few days later Sevco Scotland changed their name. D’Oh

Enough is enough
UPTHEHOOPSNOVEMBER 11, 2017 at 12:56 CLUSTER ONENOVEMBER 11, 2017 at 09:35 To me this is a statement saying….Feck we hope Murty can pull it off.this statement is just a delaying tactic
As things stand I don’t know why they don’t just give Murty the job. Perhaps if he wins the next two games that will give them the reason they need to do so.
   I imagine he is on the fitba equivalent of a zero hours contract at the moment. Real contracts cost money.  It would be a good time for Murty to negotiate his position….Before a season ticket salesman rears his head.

About the author