THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight

By

HOMUNCULUSMAY 13, 2017 at 07:59 I love the bit where Rangers had …

Comment on THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight by Cluster One.

HOMUNCULUSMAY 13, 2017 at 07:59
I love the bit where
Rangers had to be punished, they deserved to be punished.
Celtic fans or their club didn’t attempt to influence the outcome of debates on Rangers and possible sanctions.
———————-
This club accepted their sanctions and moved on.
——–
Word of advice gentlemen. From now on be very careful when talking or writing about this club. (moved on indeed)
————-
To go from deserved to be punished(But never mentions what the punishment was rangers got ) to then go on and say, the club accepted their sanctions
it’s as if he has no clue what he is talking about.just a rant and a few coupled together soundbites

Cluster One Also Commented

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
GUNNERBMAY 11, 2017 at 23:23       3 Votes 
BIG PINKMAY 11, 2017 at 22:01_______________________I suppose some may see this and pass it on to others. Change dns settings to google dns servers 8.8.8.8 or 8.8.4.4Cheers
——————-
suppose some may not have a clue how to go about that18


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I was David’s senior partner in the funding,and he would come to me from time to time.
Did Mr Murray not say Mr king was a few doors away and never dropped by to ask questions or something like that when he was a witness last week.


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
One thing we have learned about the CW court case over the last week or so is that the witnesses “Don’t Recall” much.
You would believe that when the witnesses recieved  a letter to appear as a witness, a bit of revision could have been sought.It is after all as i believe i have heard it say it’s one of the biggest trials in scottish history.It’s not as if they have not had a constant reminder of what happened


Recent Comments by Cluster One

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
DARKBEFOREDAWNJANUARY 2, 2018 at 03:48
It would take all scrutiny away from the club and could leave the chairman role to someone more respected such as Alistair Johnston.
————-
You do know Alistair Johnston.was on the board during the EBT years and  Johnston admits the other ongoing tax probe could leave Rangers with a bill they cannot afford to pay.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
UPTHEHOOPSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 21:21
I am a Celtic shareholder and if it was up to me (which it is not), I would tell the SFA here and now that Celtic Park is unavailable for any future fixture.  However I know that will not happen, but I doubt there is anything they could do to force Celtic to allow them use of the stadium.  
————
FROM LINK ABOVE.
The SFA board is due to meet in late January to consider its findings and, although no final decision is expected at that stage, it will shape Hampden’s future.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
CLUSTER ONEJANUARY 1, 2018 at 20:50
Agreed… but just where would the SFA call home?
————-
15) With recent coverage surrounding the SFA and the Hampden lease expiring in 2020, there’s asuspicion that the SFA will take internationals, finals etc to Parkhead. Can we expect the board tovigorously push Ibrox for these fixtures and thus create another important revenue stream?The Executive is in close dialogue with the SFA with regards to the situation at Hampden.
http://club1872.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGM-2017-QA.pdf
————–
Hope all the other clubs executives are in close dialogue with the SFA with regards to the situation at Hampden.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HOMUNCULUSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 20:38
There is absolutely no reason why games can’t be played in Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, or anywhere else with a stadium suitable for a specific match.
Agreed… but just where would the SFA call home?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HOMUNCULUSJANUARY 1, 2018 at 19:39
Most, not all. One also wonders who pays for the upkeep of the stadium and other associated costs.
—————–
The Spiders, who remain an amateur club and are celebrating their 150th anniversary, say comments made by SFA chief executive Stewart Regan to BBC Scotland had caused them “great concern”.
They said in a website statement that they “would seek confirmation from the Scottish FA that they have fulfilled their responsibilities, under the present lease, to maintain the stadium and further detailed evidence to support Mr Regan’s statement”.
http://www.queensparkfc.co.uk/?p=6195


About the author