The Existence of Laws

Avatar By

And on administration Quote: …

Comment on The Existence of Laws by chipm0nk.

And on administration


It’s worth noting that this is a step that Craig Whyte had to take against the backdrop of HMRC possibly winning the tax case. If he hadn’t, and they had won, then there is the very real prospect that they would have sought to liquidate the club. That would be the real worst case scenario.


Can the Scottish Government afford to have Rangers enter administration with the possible economic implications that would cause?

chipm0nk Also Commented

The Existence of Laws
Jack Irvine talking about bribing South African SARS agents to obtain “secret Government files” about Dave King’s tax case.


The Existence of Laws
resin_lab_dog says:
Saturday, June 8, 2013 at 21:37

That’s the thing.

A pre-pack would have saved the business, if not the Ltd company. However the plan all along seems to have been to save the business, to have A Rangers in the SPL debt free.

No need for a CVA, still in the SPL etc. Everything else could have been achieved.

Hence my confusion.

The Existence of Laws
ecobhoy says:
Saturday, June 8, 2013 at 21:11

Fair points, he does come across as something of a sociopath. Maybe we shouldn’t look for rational explanations all of the time.

He may also have gotten caught up in moments like this and forgotten that there was no proper business model in place without cheating and stealing.

Recent Comments by chipm0nk

Scottish Football and the case for a Bismarck!
Given the context, and the mention of the Blue Knights, then immediately speaking to Brian the most obvious assumption is that it is BK.

That would be a real Wow Just Wow moment.

CG, CW and BK meeting.

Scottish Football and the case for a Bismarck!
john clarke says:
Monday, May 13, 2013 at 19:53


Which part don’t they understand.

The team which won SFL3 would not enhance the SPL in any way, shape or form.

The team they want in the SPL does not exist any more, the majority of the players walked away, for nothing. The new club can’t just replace that team, where would the money come from to buy those players and to pay their wages.

The old club couldn’t afford them, by about £10m a year, what makes these morons think the new one will be able to.

Scottish Football and the case for a Bismarck!
Charlotte Fakeovers (@CharlotteFakes) says:
Monday, May 13, 2013 at 18:29

D’artgnan on RangerMedia – my goodness, what a waste of energy and of course a massive deflection from what really upset them all.


I also find it quite amusing when people try to write a certain way and it comes across entirely differently.

“There is a growing feeling that HMRC’s continued refusal to comment on this matter, thus preventing shareholders from seeking legal redress, is tantamount to an attempt to perverse the course of justice.”

Spell checks don’t cover everything old chap.

Scottish Football and the case for a Bismarck!
Presumably Mr Irvine was then responsible for “deleting” Craig Whyte from the interweb.

Hence the MSM not being able to establish that he was a fraudster and a liar.

Scottish Football and the case for a Bismarck!
twopanda says:
Monday, May 13, 2013 at 00:14


Where have I said liquidation wasn`t inevitable? – Course it was inevitable

If you feel who the administrator was is irrelevant – that`s fine – that`s your view – certainly not mine!


So, in your view liquidation was inevitable.

Then we are agreed.

About the author