Comment on The Existence of Laws by Resin_lab_dog.
Friday, May 31, 2013 at 19:52
Friday, May 31, 2013 at 19:44
You could well be right. But I allowed some ‘time added on’ for rule bending/breaking in their favour and the fact that some of the moo-bears may actually be quite wealthy bluenoses with a blindspot when it comes to things football. Campbell & Donald would probably find some way to syphon some of their money down Govan way, I shouldn’t wonder.
Resin_lab_dog Also Commented
The Existence of Laws
…fund raising suggestions for the site?
How about releasing a ringtone download of Craig Whyte taking a wazz? (c.f. @CharlotteFakes D+P 6 june 2012 pART 12/12 2:17:2:48?)
Has the added advantage of acting as a viral ad for this site and CF without drawing any attention actionable written record?
OK…OK… I’ll get me coat!
The Existence of Laws
I think the little twitter exchange below is illuminating.
A TRFC fan berating Charlotte for NOT doctoring the tape????
They really don’t do irony, do they!
And while I have no interest in former RFC players venereal diseases, and I don’t know (less care) whether CWs assertion is true – I have no axe to grind with the gentleman concerned, I find the fact that the administrators of the insolvency are matey enough with CW to exchange such gossip illuminating and pertinent.
Let me be clear disclosing private medical records is ethically contemptible. Whereas unsubstantiated gossiping about footballers sex lives is a national obsession. The disclosure/ unsubstantiated gossip in this instance was perpetrated by CW. If the information had reached our illustrious 4th estate instead of CF would they have censored it? I don’t reckon so.
And so I would like to furnish a nice conundrum/logical dilema for those exercised bears with the required intelectual faculties (not you Chris Graham!) to try and get their heads round:
Pick your preference:
(a) CFs incidental dislcosure of ‘pathological liar’ CWs verbal assertion about a former players medical condition was clearly a lie told by a known liar, therefore no harm was done by the incidental disclosure and CF is in the clear.
(b) CW was telling the truth on this element, and therefore possibly also on some of the other revelations in the CF tapes, therefore the CF materials and even some of what CW says in them cannot be dismissed out of hand without further scrutiny.
Which is it? It can’t be both! Or can it?
Is this one of those ‘Same club’ history, honours,/ New club debt & punsihment scenarios? i.e. was transubstantiation involved?
Esta, you get the complete unedited tape and you’re picking up on this. Question the administrators FFS.
19LisbonBhoy67 Joe Chalmers stevendoyle
3:27 PM – 11 Jun 13
Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ @esta_x 50m
@CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport so that makes it ok for u to release private medical information we don’t even know is true? #morals
Fr. Paul Stone Fr. Paul Stone @FrPaulStone 48m
@CharlotteFakes @esta_x @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport Re morals Esta, is it ok for you to pretend ur the same club after stiffing the creditors?
Gordon Gordon @Gri64 47m
@FrPaulStone @CharlotteFakes @esta_x @TomEnglishSport Oh fuck off
Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ @esta_x 44m
@FrPaulStone @CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport pretend? SFA membership transferred, so no pretending.
Fr. Paul Stone Fr. Paul Stone @FrPaulStone 42m
@esta_x @CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport Sure thing. I’ve got Andy Murrays gym membership, now I’m playing at Wimbledon next week.
Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ @esta_x 38m
@FrPaulStone @CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport aye & 50 000 tennis fans will come & watch you play
#Obsessed Par #Obsessed Par @doelcmila 33m
@esta_x Wimbledon doesn’t hold 50,000. @frpaulstone @charlottefakes @gri64 @tomenglishsport
Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ @esta_x 32m
@doelcmila @FrPaulStone @CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport but if it did they would go watch paul play #whoosh
Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ Esta ☆☆☆☆☆ @esta_x 25m
@CharlotteFakes @Gri64 @TomEnglishSport you could of / should of, edited that out. Not really important for Scottish fitbaw was it?
The Existence of Laws
June 11, 2013 at 11:54 pm
Just listened to the latest D&P tapes:
The worst part for me was hearing how Strathclydes Finest are looking for ways not to follow the evidence or get involved by simply putting it down to a jurisdiction problems.
Conjures up visions of cheif wiggum chewing a doughnot, dunnit just?
Recent Comments by Resin_lab_dog
The Offline Game
Here’s why the TOG report should desperately concern every fan of Scottish football. Here is why this is not some Celtic obsession.Let’s (for the sake of argument) leave the events of 2012 behind us and all move on together arm in arm with a spirit of cameraderie and good natured competition, come one, come all, TRFC fans and allcomers… hail fellows well met…Wind forward a few months to April 2017. Its been a mixed season on the park for TRFC and a very bad one off it. Legal bills, unforeseen costs and some straw breaks teh camel back. Another insolvency looms, but the board so thi scoming and a CVA looks possible this time.o among us has any confidence that our administrators would act without fear or favourIt could happen. But… oops… an insolvency means a points deduction. And a points deduction might mean relegation. Who upon reading the TOG report could have any confidence that our adminsitrators would not intervene unfairly to prevent such an occurrence?Who among us (CFC fans probably excepted by virtue of league strength) can be sure that it would not be our club – who played by the rules that should apply equally to all – that was unfairly relegated instead? Why would I turn up for an alleged sporting contest where this very possibility was even countenanced?Not I!
The Offline Game
I’m still catching up after an enforced absence due to family circumstances, but glad to be able to get back to this.
And so – in summary – where do we find ourselves today?
Well to buy a ST – or even a match ticket, or not? That is the salient question.
And the answer is – for me – overwhelmingly : Not.
The game is conspicuously rigged. And rigged by the very people who were charged with keeping it honest.
And we are being kept in ignorance of this fact.
And Kept in ignorance by the actions of the very people who should be charged with keeping us informed.
Its all gone a bit North Korea in Scottish football.
So its perhaps not surprising that fans like me will be ‘heading South’ so to speak.
Shame. There’s alot to like about ICTFC.
If they could only find an honest league to play in, things would be rosy indeed!
Whose assets are they anyway?
There is a way forward.
A new rangers logo.
An rfc crest
That would circumvent the mash ip issue, reconcile Scottish football.
It’s not the desire to punish former rfc fans (hail fellow John james, well met) that motivates me. There but for the grace of God and all that. No time for the knuckle draggers. But without a blatant nod in the direction of the cheating that was tolerated hitherto, games a bogey for all of us. We are here to compete against ranjurs. On a level playing field. We lose fair and square so be it. But when you tilt the park until you are sure to win, as you did for a decade, be sure to keep your nadgers out of range! We are not kicking you when you are down. We are pulling you by your exposed scrotum back into the real world from a mental illness that had consumed you and hurt us. The appropriate response is gratitude. Hint.
The Case for a New SFA.
Viz top tip:
Are you a Scottish sports journalist or fan of Ibrox club struggling to understand the meaning of the word “liquidation”?
Simply Google ” Redcar steelworks”.
Then grow a pair.
And stop insulting the intelligence of everyone else in the world and spare a thought for some genuine victims who were not the architects of their own downfall.
The Case for a New SFA.
EPL pricing out fans.
It Will not end well.
Addicted die hard fans are already deserting the Bollinger of Stamford bridge for the Buckie of lower league outfits. Have you seen the price of an EPL season ticket?
And all it takes is one EU or TTIP legal challenge and TV money is vapour!
And what does that leave?
Unpaid bills and dishonoured contracts.