The Existence of Laws

By

Gaz says: June 12, 2013 at 5:44 pm Sugar Daddy says: June 12, …

Comment on The Existence of Laws by bogsdollox.

Gaz says:
June 12, 2013 at 5:44 pm

Sugar Daddy says:
June 12, 2013 at 5:32 pm

Can you tell me where you saw Rangers’ draft accounts before, or the correspondence between various parties, including lawyers and insolvency practitioners, or how you heard the audio of several private meetings.

I certainly hadn’t seen or heard those things.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

To be fair the audio stuff has been pretty mundane and because Whyte is recording them he is measured and careful about everything he says.

The documentary evidence more or less confirms much of what has been collectively surmised on here.

We need the tapes of the SPL/SFA meetings for a real explosion.

bogsdollox Also Commented

The Existence of Laws
ecobhoy says:
June 12, 2013 at 1:01 pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I know the media are being a bit careful after the Levinson “mauling” but most of the wrong doing there was down to the newspapers bribing officials for info and directly instructing hackers. CF is different as the media were not complicit in the hacking. Surely, as in the cases you quote above, they have a public responsibility to report on alleged fraud?

In short I can’t see why there are valid legal reasons for not publication of the information or at the very least reporting of it. Clearly editorial decisions have been made not to.


The Existence of Laws
Not The Huddle Malcontent says:
June 12, 2013 at 11:47 am

Does this now mean that whilst the U21 rule for SFL clubs is gone…..Sevco Currents can not play their new signings as trialists (in league and league cup games) and will have to wait until Sept 1st to register them
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I phoned Sandy Bryson for clarification and he says it will be fine to play a trialist as technically they are not registered in the first place and if that argument doesn’t work Article 16.90 of the new rules says that:

“The Board reserves the right at all times to protect and promote the interests above all others of The Rangers (however they may be constituted at the time). Rangers are the best and boo to the rest. GIRUY’s”


The Existence of Laws
I appear to be logged in but the posts don’t appear. I suppose it’s just as well I have nothing to say


Recent Comments by bogsdollox

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
I’d estimate King’s exposure as between £2m-£4m.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’d estimate it at 12 months in the pokey.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Cluster OneDecember 22, 2017 at 21:24
BOGS DOLLOXDECEMBER 22, 2017 at 21:00 There must be institutional investors who would grab the 20p because they need to make some sort of recovery on their initial investment.I bet there are a few individual investors who are a bit cheesed off with Dave. ————– Is there anyone left who may have 1p shares from the start? 19p profit right there
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Didn’t the 1 pees later buy in for the same number of shares at a higher value thus making their average price paid much higher?

It’s a no brainer for the non emotionally involved at 20p.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
HomunculusDecember 22, 2017 at 20:42
Just one thing that confuses me.
If people are claiming that the shares are currently trading at 27p, it’s a nonsense but just for the sake of the question.
Do they think that if they double the number of shares available then they will stay at the same price.
It’s a share in a business ffs, surely if there are more of them issued then each one is worth less (or worthless in this case).
So let’s say here’s the scenario. You have shares in a business worth say 14p each. The business is making losses, every year. It’s £16m in debt, and admitting it’s going to lose more this year, and next. Predictions are of the business being £23m in debt, at least. It’s also a toxic brand, operating in a field (pardon the pun) which traditionally does not make money.
Someone comes along and offers you 20p for your shares, no questions asked, no haggling, a straight 20p a share.
You knock this back … really. 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There must be institutional investors who would grab the 20p because they need to make some sort of recovery on their initial investment.
I bet there are a few individual investors who are a bit cheesed off with Dave.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
essexbeancounterDecember 22, 2017 at 20:28
Bogs Dollox StevieBCDecember 22, 2017 at 18:29Guess that the CoS result could /should trigger a couple of events in the short-term;– King resigns from RIFC & – the auditors Campbell Dallas ‘do walking away’ ?You would think…?  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Their reputation is on the line. I would think ICAS practice regulation are keeping a close watch on this one._______________________________________________________ ICAS Practice Regulation only get upset when recalcitrant, (no, not “concomitant”) members, like me, fail to return meaningless checklists or forms in time. Please believe me…I have “got form” in this area…. Only when a serious complaint from “members of the public” is received, would any notice be taken…and minimum action result… Please remember, that ICAS members, at least 20 in number, have been involved in this whole RFC/MIH/TRFC/TRIFC omnishambles over the last 20 years or so….and….yup…a big fat zilch from the “public”… I rest my case….
_____________________________________________
Is it possible to complain anonymously? Or is it necessary to leave the country soon after complaining about “accounting concerns” ?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Cluster OneDecember 22, 2017 at 20:18
SANNOFFYMESSSOITIZZDECEMBER 22, 2017 at 18:42 2 0 Rate This https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/2017/12/22/sevco-prepares-for-a-post-king-scenario/ ——————– Wow! they want the ex -city trader to be understanding about his severance claim. ————- Mr king has already stated this matter had been delt with.Or was this glib and shamless lier not telling the truth once again
_____________________________________________________
This is like fending of HMRC in the days when 1872 was a club.

Back then the chat to the HMRC was “Look guys can you hold off for a bit from chasing the Wee Tax Case liability because new owners have taken over and we need some time to sort it all out – youse will get your doh!”
I recall the Daily Record often insisted Mark Warburton was a really smart guy.


About the author