A Blog by James Forrest for TSFM
I am a socialist, and as a socialist I believe in the fundamental goodness of people. Some people find that hard to believe when they read the stuff I write.
I published my first novel recently, on politics and the corrupting nature of it, and it is a deeply cynical book, a book where no-one has clean hands come the end. What has surprised some of those who’ve read it is that I didn’t focus on the lies and smears of the right, but the hypocrisy and deceit of those who claim to be of the left.
Corruption, you see, doesn’t respect political boundaries or points of view. It’s like rainwater. It finds every crack, and gets in there.
My political beliefs revolve around two apparently paradoxical elements; the belief in the inherent decency of people and the need for a strong, and powerful, state. I believe the second underpins the first, and this brings me into conflict with a lot of people, some on the left and some on the right. Too many people see the state as inherently evil, as something that interferes too much in the lives of ordinary people. As something suffocating.
Yet the state exists to protect us. It exists to provide a safety net. It exists to regulate and to oversee. If the state is made up of bad people, if the gears of society are captured by those with malicious or selfish intent, the results are obvious; war, corruption, chaos.
The vast majority of our problems in the modern age can be neatly summed up in two lines from Yeats’ poem “The Second Coming”, which I used to open my novel. “The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.”
We live in a time when those who are protecting their own interests have assumed such power that they’ve cowed the rest of us. They have become a law unto themselves. They have changed the nature of the game, because they have sapped our will to the extent some barely put up a fight anymore. The weak get weaker, and the strong use their strength to crush the rest even more. It is a vicious struggle, a downward spiral.
Society is held together not only by the endeavour and common interests of its citizens but by a collection of laws. We elect the people who make those laws. They do so in our name, and we can remove that right every four years. That is a powerful thing, and we do not appreciate it enough. The present corruption exists because we allow it to exist.
The people around me continue to puzzle over my uncommon interest in the affairs of a football club on the west of Glasgow. My own club plays in the east end. I tell those who ask that my primary interest in the goings-on at the club calling itself Rangers is no longer about football; how could it be, after all? With promotion this year they are still a full two divisions below us, emasculated, skint, weak and unstable. If we were fortunate enough to draw them in cup competition the match would be over, as a tie, by the halfway point … in the first half.
In footballing terms they are an utter irrelevance.
Rangers is more than a football club to me. They are a symbol. Their unfolding calamity is an on-going outrage. What is happening there, what is being allowed to happen, is an offense to decency. It is a stain on the face of our country.
In short, it is a scandal. It is a scandal without parallel in sport.
Yet it’s not just a sports story either. If it was, I might not be so focussed on it. What is happening at Rangers is a colossal failure of governance. It is a damning indictment against the very people who are supposed to oversee our game. It is a disgraceful abrogation of responsibility from those at the top, those who claim to be “running things.”
If this is not a failure of governance it is a result of corruption at the heart of our national sport. It says they are bought and paid for, and I will say no such thing here.
So let’s give them the benefit of the doubt. We’ll say instead that what they are is weak, indecisive, inept and disconnected from reality.
It reminds me of our political class, which has become insular and ignorant about what the public wants, and what it needs. It’s not a wonder parties like UKIP can achieve national vote shares of 25% at local elections. Nigel Farage strikes me as a dog-whistle politician, the kind who knows how to appeal to a select group of voters. He is little different to Charles Green, the man who beguiled Rangers fans into handing over large amounts of money, because he was “standing up for the club.” It is easy to do what he did, easy to do what Farage is doing.
Real leadership requires toughness. Say what you like about the Tories, but they have that in spades. Yeats was right about the worst being full of passionate intensity. Green was. Farage is. Cameron and Osborne personify it in their political outlook.
It is easy to be cowed by blunt force politics, and by “tough talking Yorkshire men” and venomous speeches about “strivers and skivers.” The politics of divide and conquer is the oldest form of politics there is, and it’s no surprise to see it practiced by some of the vested interests in the game here in Scotland. Yet, lest we forget … something significant happened last year. The maligned and the ignored, the weak and the voiceless found something they never realised they had. They discovered that, in a very real sense, the power was in their hands.
Last year, the fans rose up when the governing bodies and the media went all-out to save Rangers from the self-inflicted wounds caused by a decade of cheating, malpractice and ineptitude. I have no problem calling that what it was.
What happened at Rangers seemed incredible, but it was all too predictable, and some of us had been talking about it for years before it hit. The Association seemed caught in the headlights but it would amaze me if they really were as insular and ignorant as they appeared. They must have known how bad the outlook was for Rangers. They just chose to ignore it.
They were aided and abetted by a thoroughly disreputable media, a collection of cowards and compromisers, charlatans and frauds, masquerading as journalists, but who long ago laid aside any claim to be bold investigators and settled for commenting on events as they unfolded. More often than not, with their ill-informed opinions, sometimes due to weaknesses in intellect and others wilfully ignorant, they failed even in that.
Entire newspapers became PR machines for crooks and swindlers. They aided in the scam because they didn’t do their jobs, some because they were lazy, some because they were incompetent and others because they wanted a seat at the table and were willing to sacrifice whatever integrity they once had in exchange for one.
That all of this was embraced by the Rangers fans is amazing to me. They trusted when they should have been asking questions. They closed their eyes, covered their ears and sang their battle tunes at the top of their voices so they wouldn’t have to hear anything they didn’t like. As incredible as I found it then, and still find it now – and now, even more so, when they have already seen the results of it once – I find it pathetic too, and I do feel pity for some of them.
A lot of these people are genuine football fans, and nothing more. They have no interest in the phony narrow nationalism, or the over-blown religion, or the notion of supremacy which manifested itself in a ludicrous statement from McCoist when interviewed recently on Sky.
Some of the Rangers fans look at their team of duds, kids and journeymen, they look at a boardroom of cowards and crooks, they look at a failing manager in his first (and last) job in the game and at a dark future and are not in the least bit impressed by, or interested in, the chest-out arrogance espoused in those ridiculous words “we are the people.” They know full well that their present crisis was made by men like McCoist, and they understand that pretentious posturing is not an act born of strength, but a scrambling around in the gutter, and a symptom of weakness.
They understand their position, and they hate it. And because they care about Rangers, because they value the club, because they cherish those things that made it a great Scottish institution, they want that back. They understand that before the Union Jack waving, Sash singing, poppy wearing, Nazi saluting, Orange element became the public face of their support Rangers meant something else, and that, above all things, is what pains them the most.
People do not hate Rangers. When the country appeared to turn its back last year, they were turning the back on favouritism and the bending of rules. Yet it would be a lie to say that there is not an element of dislike in the gleeful mockery of many rival fans.
But they don’t hate Rangers either. They hate the version of it around which a certain section of the support continues to dance. They hate the version which hates, and so too do many, many, many Rangers supporters, and they definitely deserve better.
David Murray chose not to openly challenge that version. Indeed, he encouraged certain strands of it to flourish and grow, with his “Britishness Days” and his effort to turn the club into the “team that supports the troops.” Other clubs have done as much, if not more, for the British Army than the one that plays out of Ibrox. Other clubs have given more money. Other clubs have lent their support to those on the front lines. They just chose to do it with respect, and with class, and with dignity. They chose to do it in private, understanding that there eventually comes a tipping point between looking after the ends of the soldiers and using them to promote your own.
The army has not battened on to Rangers. Rangers has battened on to them, and although it is unclear when an altruistic motive became darker, what started out as a gesture of solidarity is now used to entrench division and promote a notion of superiority.
Craig Whyte took over from Murray and immediately understood the lure of the “dog whistle.” He knew too that the media would accept whatever he told them, without question, and as he spoke up for “Rangers traditions” he made sure the lunatic fringe was well onside. He met face to face with the hard-core extremists in the support first and made them his praetorian guard. They spoke up for him until the day the club entered administration.
So, whereas Murray pandered to them and Whyte used them to further his own ends, it was only a matter of time before someone suggested to Charles Green that he could use the same tactics to win over the support. He went even further and blatantly promoted and encouraged this mind-set, and stoked the hate and nonsense to frightening new heights. The same people who cheered Whyte to the rafters jumped on board the Big Blue Bus and the results are clear.
Through all of it, the ordinary Rangers fan has seen his club buffered against the rocks, battered, broken, smashed to smithereens and sunk. Now there’s a big hole in the side of the lifeboat, and they are terrified that further tragedies await.
They are right to be concerned. Much of the media is still not telling them what they need to know. The people in charge of their club – the owners who have lied, the former hack who covered up the truth about Whyte and now acts as a mouthpiece for Green, the “club legends” who are content to sup with the devil and take his greasy coin when they should be standing toe-to-toe with the fans – are trying to silence those members of the press who do have facts to present.
How many times now have media outlets been banned from Ibrox for daring to report the truth? The manager who demanded the names of a committee last year defends those inside the walls who are desperate to keep secret the things that are going on. He is either an unprincipled coward, or he is, himself, bought and paid for. The fans suffer for it.
The “inconvenient truth” is still being kept from them, and this denies them any chance to play an active role in their club. Indeed, it is all too possible that they’ve passed a point of no return, and that their club is heading for a new liquidation event and it can no longer be stopped.
In either case, their power has been eroded to the point at which they must feel they have nothing left to do but stand back and watch what happens next.
They are wrong. I am a socialist. I believe in the inherent good of people. I think the ordinary decent Rangers fans are the only people left who can save their club … and the means by which they will do it is as simple as it could be.
They must stand up for “big government.” They must embrace the need for a “strong state.” They must lobby the SFA, and they must trust the SFA and they must get the SFA to follow its own rules and thereby save them from any further harm.
There is a tendency amongst some Celtic fans to see our governing bodies as pro-Rangers. If it is true then those running our game are ruining Scottish football without benefiting the thing they love more. The incalculable harm that has been done to Rangers in the last 20 some months is a direct result of the subservient media and the willingness of the football authorities to be “deaf, dumb and blind.” Those who believe this has actually helped the Ibrox club have not been paying attention in class. It has irrevocably scarred them, and it may yet have played a hand in destroying them once and for all, as a force if not as a club entirely.
For years, the SFA sat and did nothing as a club in their association operated a sectarian signing policy. They did nothing whilst the fans sang sectarian songs. In their failure to act they strengthened those elements of the Rangers support, instead of isolating, alienating and eventually helping to eliminate those who saw that club as a totem pole of division and hate. Their failure over EBT’s, and their lack of scrutiny, led to one of the greatest scandals in the history of sport, and I say that with no equivocation at all. The testimony of their registrations officer in the Lord Nimmo Smith investigation was a disgrace and in years to come it will rank as one of the most disreputable and damaging moments in the association’s history.
The most egregious failures of all were the failures in the so-called “fit and proper person” tests, which allowed first Whyte and then Charles Green to assume controlling positions at Ibrox. They will pass the buck and say the responsibility lies with the club itself, in much the same way as they are content to let the club investigate itself at the present time, but any neutral who looks at this stance knows it is unprincipled and spineless. It’s like letting the defence set the terms at a trial. It is foxes investigating the chicken coop.
It is a blueprint for corruption, and a recipe for disaster.
It is now too late for the SFA to declare Green “unfit”, as it was too late when they finally slapped that title on Craig Whyte. He and his allies own Rangers, and they control its destiny. They can push the club to the wall if they choose, in the final extremity, if that gets them what they want. The time for changing that is past. The damage has already been done. The barbarians are not at the gates. They are inside the walls, and sacking the city.
The SFA will be forced to punish Rangers for the sins of the owners, for the second time in as many years, and whilst it is right that the club face up to that, all the better to send a message to other clubs and other owners, the SFA cannot be allowed to slither off the hook here as though this was none of their doing. Green will skip off into the sunset. Craig Whyte has yet to pay his fine. These people never cared about Scottish football and they don’t care now.
The SFA are supposed to. Our governing body is supposed to govern, for the good of the whole game, and not as a support system for a single club. What they have allowed to happen on their watch is absolutely shameful and if the people responsible were men at all, with any sense of accountability, they would resign en masse.
They can pretend ignorance, but only the truly ignorant would accept that. Craig Whyte was not inside Ibrox a week before RTC and other sites were dismantling his entire business history, with some of the people here doing the work the SFA would not. Whyte himself claims to have made the governing bodies aware of the scale of what was facing the club, and they did nothing at all. Heads should have rolled a year ago.
In October of last year, on this very site, I posted an article in which I wrote:
“Which isn’t to say the due diligence matter isn’t worrying, because, of course, it is. Again, no-one is going to convince me that the SFA has conducted proper due diligence on Charles Green and his backers. No-one will convince me they are satisfied that this club is in safe hands, and that the game in this country will not be rocked by a further implosion at Ibrox. They failed to properly investigate Craig Whyte, because of lax regulations requiring disclosure from the club itself, regulations which are just a joke, but they can be forgiven for that as the press was talking sheer nonsense about him having billions at his disposal, and a lot of people (but not everyone!) were either convinced or wanted to be convinced by him.
To have witnessed what Whyte did, to have witnessed the Duff & Phelps “process” of finding a buyer, and having Green essentially emerge from nowhere, with a hundred unanswered questions as to his background and financing, for the SFA to have given this guy the go ahead, only for it to blow up in their faces later, would annihilate the credibility of the governing body and necessitate resignations at every level. There would be no hiding place.”
There are times when it is fun to be right, but this is not one of them. It is dispiriting and disquieting to have been so on the nose. It scares the Hell out of me, as someone who loves football in this country, to have seen this matter clearly when the people running our game apparently either did not or chose to ignore very real, very obvious, concerns. The Internet Bampots had no special insight or access to information that was denied those at the SFA. We just weren’t prepared to ignore it and pretend that it wasn’t there. There was too much at stake.
I have become convinced that things will never change until the Rangers supporters join us in demanding the full and unabridged truth here. They need to come out from under the bed, and confront their fears. They need to be willing to take the consequences, so that their club can emerge clean from this, and start again, with all this behind them.
And it can all happen with one simple thing. The application of the rules.
The existence of laws comes down to a simple principle; they protect society from those elements within it who are interested only in their own selfish ends. We may cry out at those rules and regulations we see as “restrictive”, but the law was not made to restrict our freedoms but to protect them. Had the SFA years ago acted against Rangers sectarian signing policy, and the songs from the stands, the club would not have mutated to the point where there was no help on hand when they needed it the most. Let’s not kid ourselves about this; Whyte and Green were only able to grab control because the club itself has a dreadful image which put off respectable and responsible buyers. The SFA could have helped change that perception years ago and did nothing.
The SFA could have conducted its own investigation into who Craig Whyte was. They could have asked David Murray for full disclosure when he was running up £80 million of debt, a sum of money that is beyond belief for a single club in a small provincial backwater league. Had they had the guts to do that the club would never have spent itself into oblivion and forced the hand of Lloyds, which led indirectly to their ignominious end.
The SFA could have fully investigated Charles Green and the means by which he took control, instead of rushing through a license. His emergence at the last minute was transparently suspicious and designed to force them into a quick decision, but they did not have to bow to that pressure by making one, without being in possession of the facts, as it is now 100% clear they were not.
Had they asked for every document, had they insisted on legal affidavits and personal securities from investors (and this would have been perfectly legitimate and is common place in other licensing areas) none of this would have come to pass. After Craig Whyte they had a moral responsibility to the rest of the game to get this one right and their failure is without parallel in the history of Scottish football.
As the club hurtles towards a new abyss, names are cropping up which should send a shudder down the spines of every honest, genuine supporter of not only Rangers but every team in the land. The SFA claims that a strong Rangers is essential for the sake of Scottish football, but they have been extraordinarily lax in protecting that club, and therefore the game, from destructive elements. Craig Whyte and Charles Green had dubious personal histories, and the acquisition of the club itself was mired in controversy and scandal. Yet it was allowed.
Neither Green nor Whyte were known to have operated outside the law, yet neither was worthy of trust or stood up to scrutiny. Neither man should ever have been granted the status as fit and proper persons to assume a role in our national sport, and if it is true of them what can we say about the three men who are, presently, being touted as the Great White Hopes for a bright, new Rangers future; Dave King and the Easdale brothers?
King recently cut a deal with the South African government over an on-going dispute over taxes. In other words, he pled guilty and accepted the central plank of their argument; that for years he was engaged in wilfully with-holding vast revenues from their Treasury. The media does not like to put it like that, and the SFA seems willing to ignore it utterly, and this would be scandalous enough. But it does not stop there. HRMC rules – as well as the SFA’s own governance documents – actually bar him from serving on the board of the new club.
Last but not least, aside from being an admitted tax cheat, King is also awaiting trial in South Africa, having been indicted for corruption, forgery and fraud – 300 charges in total. Yet as recently as last week, we were told that the Association was willing to look at him and consider representations from his lawyers. This is almost beyond belief.
If Dave King’s position is untenable, and he is yet to be convicted of a crime, what can we say about the position of the Easdale’s? One of the two brothers, Sandy, has already served jail time. He is a convicted criminal, a fraudster nonetheless, who’s “victim” was the same Treasury who are appealing one case involving the old club and liquidated it entirely over another. This is precisely the kind of “businessman” the fit and proper person test was supposed to weed out, and if the SFA holds its nose here the reek will stink out the halls at Hampden for decades. If King or the Easdale’s are judged fit and proper, then who exactly is the test for? What exactly do you have to do to fail it? How do we explain the existence of laws, when these are not applied?
Pascal says “Law without force is impotent.” The SFA’s weakness has allowed one version of Rangers to destroy itself, and has allowed an existential risk to another. If the next power at Rangers resides in South Africa or Greenock I can say with some certainty that the Association is engaged in an even more dangerous roll of the dice, because the surfacing of fresh scandal will be an ever present risk, and will be of the sort no-one will survive.
The damage to Scottish football will take years to heal. The Scottish game has been through enough trauma. It does not need more. It barely survived the last calamity to hit Rangers. The rest of us should not be forced to pay the price of the next one.
The greater damage will be done to Rangers itself. If the Green crisis ends in another collapse – as it well might; another administration event is a certainty, and another liquidation is a much more likely prospect than it was before 14 February 2012 – the club will once again have to start from the bottom, and this time the reputational damage will be impossible to repair. The club faces internal strife, sporting sanctions, and criminal investigations. The last takeover might be declared a fraud. the Whyte takeover will almost certainly be. The share issue might be invalid, as well as criminal, and the people involved may well end up in jail. Lawsuits could follow from investors, there could be as yet unknown consequences from the Upper Tier Tax Tribunal (thank you Brogan Rogan for pointing out what those might be) and a host of other issues.
Rangers fans must be the loudest voices here. How do you want the world to view your club in years to come? Do you want one to be proud of, or one forever associated with the shame and disgrace of these days gone by? The one which bailed out on its tax obligations. The one with supporters who disgrace your very name. The one which allowed Whyte and Green to take you to the cleaners and send you to the wall. The one which handed over control to one convicted criminal and another awaiting trial. Do you want to be reborn clean, or mired in the muck?
David Murray destroyed your financial stability. He made it so no bank would issue you a line of credit and no investor of note wanted to buy. Craig Whyte liquidated you. Charles Green has cast the future of the Newco into doubt and acted in a manner which has annihilated your credibility with the financial markets for decades to come.
Between these three men, they have taken everything from you, and the press and the people who run the game here, as well as some of your own blindly ignorant fans, have allowed them to do all this and more. Now they conspire to hand the keys to Ibrox to other men of questionable character, who will wreck further havoc on the reputation of the club.
The Scottish Football Association has damaged the game it was supposed to protect, but above all else their greatest failure of governance was a failure to protect one of its biggest clubs from its own excesses and those of its owners.
Rangers fans, the SFA have betrayed your trust, more than the trust of any other club. What you must insist on now is full disclosure and transparency from the powers that be in Hampden. The SFA has to end the charade of allowing your club to handle this in-house. They must hand everything over to an outside agency – whether a legal one, or a footballing body like UEFA – and they must demand co-operation and answers, and threaten to withhold the license if they don’t get them.
You must not be afraid of that. You must embrace it. The men with their hands on the gears at Ibrox are motivated by money, and nothing more. If the license is withdrawn their “investments” are worthless. They cannot risk that.
You must demand that the rules on fit and proper persons are applied, and where necessary even made stronger, to prevent your club falling into unclean hands. You must demand that they protect your reputation from further damage, by getting this all out there and acting accordingly, even if that means your club does not play football for at least a year.
You must be willing to suck it all up, knowing that what will emerge is a Rangers which has been cleansed and moves forward with honour, and dignity, led by custodians who treasure it rather than those who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
The Rangers Standard has recently emerged as a genuine voice for those in your support who are sick and tired of what Rangers has become, and want it restored to something that is worthy of the love and respect in which you hold it. On that website, there are discussions about the kind of club you seek to be and about whether the institution of Rangers is about more than just football.
If that’s how you feel about it then you know it is about more than how many titles the club can claim, about more than just results on the park, about more than just the game. Rangers, like Celtic, is an idea. It has to be something you are proud of.
I am a socialist, but one with a fevered imagination and a tendency to write very dark things. This piece won’t have been good reading for some of you (perhaps all of you haha!) but I think there’s more hope in here than in other things I’ve written.
In spite of everything that’s come to pass, I still believe. I believe in Scottish football. I believe in our system of football governance, even if those who are working in it are failing on some level.
In society, as much as we strain against them, laws exist for our protection. To fail to enforce them is to leave us at the mercy of those elements who would do us harm. The rules of football ensure the protection of all clubs, not just a few.
The failure to enforce the rules has never had graver consequences than here in Scotland. The irony is that bending and breaking them has hurt the one club those violations were designed to help. It cannot be allowed to happen again.
The rules must be applied without fear or favour.
The best must find their conviction, and their passionate intensity once more.
James is a co-editor of the On Fields of Green Blog http://www.onfieldsofgreen.com/
Lord Wobbly says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 21:46
—
Alloa (having just had a penalty saved) 3 v Pars 0
——
I thoroughly enjoyed the last 30 minutes, and saw some really quite good stuff from Alloa.
Dunfermline looked a wee bit pedestrian and unimaginative.
To me, that was good, honest-to-God sport and entertainment.
it remains to be seen whether D’line can pull off another minor miracle in the second leg.
The happiness of being neutral!
Danish Pastry says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 21:58
Have to agree – his interview was superb. Craig Burley should be made to watch that, and then asked which bit of infamous ‘diddy cluba deciding the fate of Rangers’ Sunday Mail column he’d like to retract first.
fara1968 says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 21:59
0 0 Rate This
Re CF latest audio
Who exactly would Deloittes not go near, Rafat or Whyte, assuming of course we are listening to CG & CW. It could be either of them going by the audio.
———–
In the context, it sounds like Rafat because of his ‘dodgy’. I wonder if Green had the slightest inkling that this was all being recorded?
john clarke says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 22:02
Again, have to agree. Alloa looked very, very good, and on that evidence could give several SPL a teams a run for their money. The fact that they always looked to pass the ball was brilliant, and the intricate stuff was especially good to watch. Dunfermline looked very predictable, and the long ball wasn’t ever going to get them anywhere.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Hartley is snapped up in the close season by an SPL team, although for Alloa’s sake, I hope not.
fara1968 says: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 21:59
Re CF latest audio
Who exactly would Deloittes not go near, Rafat or Whyte, assuming of course we are listening to CG & CW. It could be either of them going by the audio.
==================================
The audio starts with:
Green “Rafat and I sat with Deloittes last Wednesday in the Grosvenor. Deloittes won’t act for him”
Whyte responds “What’s he done”
Green replies with mutterings from Whyte in between “Cos he’s got a dodgy …. a dodgy offshore” …….. “obviously that’s not for public consumption”
If we are now being invited, albeit with an understandable level of scepticism, to view Charlottes offering as valid then perhaps I should throw in what little I did exact from reading through her posts. Or by reading through her post (singular) as I only really got a chance to dissect the first one.
Charlotte Fakeovers (@CharlotteFakes) says:
Saturday, May 11, 2013 at 20:23
In this post she used the line “The Chris Akers and Andrew Ellis story begins”.
I posted a bit of video of Chris Akers giving a presentation in New Zealand. He very helpfully provided a summary of his bacgground to his audience (he was majoring on entrepeneurship). His big break came when he got involved with Planet Football which was bought over by Sky, he said (can’t remember off the top of my head the Sky renaming). Basically Akers was aiming to do an online football channel to challenge Sky’s domination. His rather audacious stratedgy was to buy up enough EPL clubs to provide a voting block. He got involved with Leeds United I think (early/mid 2000’s). Not sure if this was a vaible strategy but this is what he said.
Eventually, prior to the Sky purchase, Planet Football had managed to to get a bunch of EPL online rights. Suspect his club purchasing stategy hit the buffers.
Later info concerning Rangers has CW/media House discussing STV with a view to a purchase. Now Akers plan concerning EPL may have been a bit moonbeams but to do so in the SPL might just have been plausible. I recall St. Mirrens sale was being touted around at one point and currently Herats might be bought for a song.
It was all prepositioned on a worldwide media offering and in Akers presentation he did make a passing reference to the SPL. Not sure what worldwide SPL rights online might be worth (I understand current SPL TV deal is not a lucrative contract) but with 4 billion people sitting in front of blank TV/computer screens in China, a resourceful businessman MIGHT be able to scrape together £50M at a wild guess. This might buy a fair few SPL clubs.
Huge conjecture on my behalf and only stringing to gether dispirit pieces of information in a random manner. Purely suggested for discussion.
I accept no responsibility for fingers that might be burnt and reputations scorched (primarily mine) in debating such ill founded speculation.
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 1m
The proposal has been made in the name of Blue Pitch Holdings, who own just over 6% of the club’s shares.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 2m
It is proposed that the pair be replaced in the Ibrox boardroom by current shareholders James Easdale and Chris Morgan.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 2m
Resolutions proposed include removal from the board of the club’s chairman Malcolm Murray and the non-executive director Philip Cartmell.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 3m
The Rangers board has been asked to call an extraordinary general meeting with the aim of pushing through significant change.
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont54s
The Rangers board has been asked to call an extraordinary general meeting with the aim of pushing through significant change.
Resolutions proposed include removal from the board of the club’s chairman Malcolm Murray and the non-executive director Philip Cartmell.
It is proposed that the pair be replaced in the Ibrox boardroom by current shareholders James Easdale and Chris Morgan. The proposal has been made in the name of Blue Pitch Holdings, who own just over 6% of the club’s shares.
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 1m EGM tomorrow – Stockbridge was at the meeting on the audio from earlier. As for Morgan, forces my hand for another document tonight.
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 4m
EGM tomorrow – Stockbridge was at the meeting on the audio from earlier. As for Morgan, forces my hand for another document tonight.
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
I thought Alloa Athletic were fantastic tonight and it would have been something of a travesty had it only been 2-0. As said above, some of their play was extremely pleasing on the eye and the skill level right through the team very high. I have seen them twice this season and been very impressed with them both times. Their stand out player in one of the matches only made the bench tonight. They have also had to cope with loan players Low, Megginson, Tapping and Thomson returning to their SPL clubs. I can see them winning at EEP on Sunday too.
Tough on Dunfermline and I see fans of other clubs on other forums delighting in how bad they are but it’s basically a team of teenagers with a couple of old heads and these lads may benefit from relegation and playing week in week out at a level that suits where they are right now in their development.
Still catching up, but my take on the CF debate.
TSFM (and everyone else) is absolutely right to be sceptical.
That said, in my opinion, it would have been more than sufficient for TSFM to post a disclaimer (even if that means at the start of every CF post) to the effect that they were allowing the posts to be published, but that that did not in any way suggest an agreement or support of the content).
It’s not as if we are not well versed in separating the wheat from the chaff.
iamacant says: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 22:21
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 1m EGM tomorrow – Stockbridge was at the meeting on the audio from earlier. As for Morgan, forces my hand for another document tonight.
================================
Chris Morgan (Asia Credit Corporation) was one of the initial consortium and held 400,000 of the initial 22M shares that were created (at 1p each)
Re CF…
Does it feel like there’s a lot of that conversation missing on both ends of the tape? It feels like it’s been cut from a longer recording. Why not just release the whole thing?
Also, the bubble signature on the bottom of the LBC seems familiar. Doesn’t CW have girly handwriting like that? Does anyone have a link to a sample like the director appointments from a while back?
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 1m
The proposal has been made in the name of Blue Pitch Holdings, who own just over 6% of the club’s shares.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 2m
It is proposed that the pair be replaced in the Ibrox boardroom by current shareholders James Easdale and Chris Morgan.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 2m
Resolutions proposed include removal from the board of the club’s chairman Malcolm Murray and the non-executive director Philip Cartmell.
Expand
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 3m
The Rangers board has been asked to call an extraordinary general meeting with the aim of pushing through significant change.
actually just had a look at craig whytes john hancock. not similar at all…. my bad
I wish Craig (sorry Charlotte ….I keep thinking Rampling , I know I am not alone on that) would publish the tape I have got a busy day tomorrow and need some kip.
Lord Wobbly,
You need to read faster and catch up!
Rangers EGM called. Events picking up again.
It never rains but it pours.
May any of the put upon fans be a this moment be reaching for the off button down Govan. Way and saying enough!
Certainly you may be sure none of the upright old guard will be reaching in the drawer for the pistol , no likely checking their salaries safe.
Spivs will be checking airline schedules.
Furtive my oh my Dougie
Forres Dee (@ForresDee) says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 22:34
0 0 Rate This
Lord Wobbly,
You need to read faster and catch up!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trying, but I’ve not been able in the last couple of days. Are you referring to anything in particular?
Lord Wobbly,
You need to read faster and catch up!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trying, but I’ve not been able in the last couple of days. Are you referring to anything in particular?
———————-
You’ll get there!
The jury is still out on CF but the tape sounds genuine and if so, then depending on the date of the recording, Deloitte may have been persuaded to put its name to a stock exchange document under false pretences.
It seems clear that Charles Green was openly saying that he would lie to Deloitte about whether he knew Rafat Rizvi so as to keep Deloitte onside.
This is not something a big 4 firm can allow to fester; expect fairly immediate action on their part; as for Chris Morgan, we await CF’s next revelation but it sounds destined to put the cat amongst the EGM pigeons.
All in all, not good news for genuine investors and damning for the bona fides of the Scottish football authorities.
54p to 0
Whilst waiting for the tape …. like any organisation going through a crisis there will be many strands to this but in all cases keep your eyes on the prize (i.e. the money), there are wheels within wheels.
Absolute known facts , McCoist and Smith want to keep spending money like nothing has changed from their SPL days; Green and the investors want to turn a buck which involves significant downsizing and to make money; Whyte wants money from Green and the investors as a pay off (assumption really)
Murray I suspect is standing in the way of the investors getting a return and is not going along with cost cutting and is using the ‘problem’ of who owns what to put these gentlemen back in their box. Murray knows that any Scottish court will find in their favour (as long as no one was killed) and the SFA will simply rip up the 5 way agreement and write a new one ……….
….. so all of this has got nothing to do with licenses or who owns Ibrox, it is about the Rangers old guard clinging on to the structure and cost base of the club in face of what they see as hostile action …….
No idea who will win, but all very unedifying must be soul destroying for the current employees.
Another doc up online on Scribed by CF – exchange of emails, implying that Rizvi was heavily involved.
Just a test to see if I can link back to earlier posts. If this works I’ll post links to all of Charlottes pearls.
http://twitter.com/CharlotteFakes
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 5m
Here’s yet another loan proposal – there were many. Let’s hide it though. SK Ali is an alias for Rafat Rivzi.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/141736878/imran-rafat-craig-aidan-chris …
slimshady61 says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 22:43
It seems clear that Charles Green was openly saying that he would lie to Deloitte about whether he knew Rafat Rizvi so as to keep Deloitte onside.
This is not something a big 4 firm can allow to fester; expect fairly immediate action on their part; as for Chris Morgan, we await CF’s next revelation but it sounds destined to put the cat amongst the EGM pigeons.
———————————
yeah, wonder if anyone has sent it onto Deloittes and how long they’ll take to act!
Just to clarify – Rizvi is the one wanted by Interpol for involvement in the collapse of a bank in Indonesia? Did a runner to Singapore as there was no extradition treaty. Stay classy, Sevco Scotland.
From:
Imran Ahmad
Date: 21 June 2012Subject: Fwd: Follow UpTo: Aidan Earley, Craig Whyte2
Cc: Chris Morgan (Business email)Let’s make it happen. You can set up your own SPV to make the loan as long as the directors arearms length etc from Fund. Think this is much more achievable than a complicated investmentagreementBegin forwarded message:
From:
S K ali
Date:
21 June 2012 11:40:34 GMT+01:00
To:
Imran Ahmad, Chris Morgan (Home email)
Subject:
Follow Up
Dear Imran,I have been in touch with a number of the investors this morning and they would be grateful for clarification on the following issues.1. The potential investor for GBP8mm – why do you not structure this as a loan with acoupon and provide security over some of the assets of the Club?2. Realistically the only asset that could be of use to a lender is the Training Ground3. Our suggestion would be two 5 year loans for up to GBP 4mm each with GBP4mm due next week. The other GBP 4mm callable by the Club at any time after 1October and puttable by the lender at any time from date of signing. so if they havefunds available earlier then the Lender can force the Hold Co to take the money,otherwise if, as the Lender has stated, its funds are only available after 1October the Hold Co will not be able to ask for funds until then. (of course if theydon’t have the funds in October and Hold Co calls then Lender will be in breachand the commitment for accepting their additional GBP 4mm would fall away)4. Coupon of 8% per annum5. Secured against Training Ground6. Club has right to repay after a minimum of 1 year after drawdown on each tranche7. Warrants at 50p for ____ shares (to be discussed)8. Lender has right to appoint 2 non-execs to the Board (which we know would besubject to usual fit and proper tests)This would appear to be a fair structure and one which should achieve all that they want but alsoprovide the Hold Co with the flexibility that it needs.I also believe that this “direct” lending avoids theneed to put in place structures that make the Lender uncomfortable.I suggest you move this forward asap.
RegardsSK
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 7m
It’s clear to me that there’s a reason for removing Malcolm Murray. He’s the only one capable of stopping these rogues taking everything.
Charlotte is a busy bee tonight.
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 3m It’s clear to me that there’s a reason for removing Malcolm Murray. He’s the only one capable of stopping these rogues taking everything
Running fast to catch up with all the very interesting posts today, I find myself having to remind myself that the question as to who and by what means the stiffers of RFC ( and,let’s not forget, the creditors and the taxpayer and the rest of Scottish Football) brought about the death of RFC is, although very interesting, really of secondary importance.
The principal focus for us, i believe, should be on the complete failure of the SFA, whether through sheer bloody incompetence or, as many suspect, through corrupt ‘revolving door’ complicity, to discharge , on behalf of all the members of the SFA, their duty to see that member clubs complied in every respect with the rules, whether in respect of ‘fitness’ of individuals or soundness of finance and so on.
By all means let the supporters of the dead RFC tear each other apart over which bunch of spivs and charlatans have taken , and are still taking, them for a ride ( or an anglo-saxon translation of that phrase).
We should be concentrating on the question : how fit for purpose are the present board of the SFA? Are they simply incompetent? Or were there in the past and are there now , elements of conspiratorial corruption ?
As said before, what that now dead club did, and what RIFC is now doing is not the main story.
No, the main story remains the fact that RFC were protected and cossetted , and that RIFC is similarly being protected and cossetted by the SFA and the SMSM– to the detriment of the rest of the footballing, the wonderful footballing, world of Scotland.
This will be defining re SFA fit an proper. Busboys at the helm, even sevco die hards are wary of them.
Makes Cragie look a world class chappie
Looks like things are unravelling fast now. Everyone will be leaking like a sieve. STs on sale yet? I agree with CF about Malcolm Murray – I said last week, the spiv element want him out – he knows what’s gone on and is the main barrier to the spivs winning the day.
Just checked on TRFC website:
“Match ticket and season ticket information for season 2013/14 will be updated in due course”
Phew. They seem to be on the case.
Didn’t work the way I wanted it to. Still, it seems to link to Charlottes twitter account which might be useful. Had intended getting to my bed reasonably early tonight but suspect the sun will be up before my head is down.
Anyone know how I can post Word and Excel documents (I know Auldheid posts links to documents, how does he do that). I was putting together a summary of her historical stuff which I will return to now just for completeness.
Still appreciate (Oh look, there’s a squirrel), this could be another layer in the obfuscation campaign. However as Senior most perceptably divined, I have a bit of time on my hands at the moment and the exercise will keep my mind ticking over.
BRTH
I really was hoping to get around to viewing the full episode of ‘The Vital Spark’ but as someone once said, events dear boy, events.
Can’t stop laughing @corsica1968 3m
Hmmm? FFW mobile phones are off…anyway this is what their letter looks like. pic.twitter.com/ZNQRiSFeDa
Interesting point on the latest Charlotte document from @CelticResearch:
elticResearch @CelticResearch 11m
Bang!!!
Current Sevco director Ahmad emailing Whyte, Chris Morgan and Rafat Rivzi. AFTER SEVCO SCOTLAND TOOK OVER on June 20th!!
RM in lockdown?
I have read the alleged “Letter Before Claim” and have one comment to make.
I don’t know who wrote it, or who is purported to have written it however there are parts of it which I find extremely dubious.
These include, but are not limited to things such as “Imran Ahmad reported that his boss at Zeus Capital …”
“… his boss at Zeus Capital…” really. Is that the Zeus Capital he was Managing Director of (I ended that sentence with a preposition, sue me).
A formal document stating that “Imran Ahmad reported that his boss at Zeus Capital …” really. How remarkably informal.
There are other examples of parts which suggest to me that if this is really what was sent then it was not written by a professional. More likely an enthusiastic amateur picking bits and pieces up as they go along. Maybe referencing material from the interweb and putting something together.
For what could be such an important document it would surely have been a good idea to actually have a lawyer act on their behalf.
If this was sent at all, and I have my doubts, it would not surprise me if the recipients lawyers had advised that totally ignoring it would be a perfectly safe policy.
In case there is any semblance of doubt, I am neither a layer nor an accountant, I have too much pride.
I may be imagining things but isn’t it Brian Kennedy that Charles Green is referring to on the audio clip, there is a definite reference to the Sale Sharks.
I agree the LBC looks a bit iffy/C and P. Our hero, Craig Whyte has form for this, no? 😉
He was drip feeding stuff via Alex Tomo for a while – perhaps he has decided to play his joker and put all the info into the public domain via internet bampottery.
Having been out and about all evening could someone sumerize what’s gone on especially in relation to CF. I noted early on TSFM refered to CF as a girl, is this fact. What were the content of letter. A brief summary would be great. Cheers
‘In case there is any semblance of doubt, I am neither a layer nor an accountant, I have too much pride’ – this would be a nice bye-line for the blog!
Agree on the LBC, however, imagine it is real, and with all it’s flaws was sent, delivered and received – does it pass muster as part of any pre-action protocol?
Jersey Trusts ….
http://www.jatco.org/bfiles/TrustBrochure.pdf
Notice how the bullet point (notes) refer to undermining the laws of other jurisdictions …
Your chance to impress me here BRHT on my request “lol
Newsnight Scotland – just showed the front pages of Thursday’s newspapers.
The Herald run with Boardroom take over at Rangers. Did not see anything from the DR or the Sun. Perhaps they are behind the curve and do not know how to catch up at this point?
A letter before action is a warning shot – it can contain any relevant info and doesn’t have to be sent by a lawyer. You just write to the other party outlining your gripe in as much detail as you wish and give them a timescale to get back to you, or you will instruct lawyers to act/escalate to a claim in whichever court is relevant.
Test
Chipm0nk
My thoughts exactly— however—- the show is now in full swing as they say!
I have no doubt that the provider of the letter is genuine– but it shows a real amateurishness on the part of Whyte which is astonishing for someone who has a multimillion pound claim.
However, for the moment, that letter is a sideshow to an extent.
There appears to be hell holy warfare within Ibrox– and the faceless spivs and are now coming to the surface only to find that Charlotte the Harlot is sabotaging the lifeboats– and doing it somewhat spectacularly.
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 3m
Is it true that Imran is attending tomorrow? Let’s see if he remembers this chat regarding Rangers Players/Legends/Executives and Salaries.
Its going to be a long night.
CF about to upload something from Imran about salaries. This is fun. I’l be up all night at this rate.
Even white breeks man is monitoring the situation just now. He’ll be in panic mode
just as well they didn’t release this before seasons end
smells fishy to me
ruse to create market in the zombies for the shares?
all not what it appears
we will see
the reaction on sevcomedia should be entertaining enough
More incoming
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 4m
I shall upload in a moment. They were spot on about Broadfoot, but actually, disrespectful all the same.
easyJambo says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 20:07
Is it possible that CW involved as early as 2010 in Project Charlotte?
———————————————————-
It’s certainly possible. CW was convinced at least as early as that his taking over of RFC was a done deal.
Herald will have the shareholders potential boardroom coup on the frontpage according to Newsnight Scotland.
briggsbhoy says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 23:17
‘TSFM refered to CF as a girl, is this fact. What were the content of letter. A brief summary would be great. Cheers’
—
it is a fact that TSFM used the female pronoun.
But I suspect that that was as a courtesy to a poster who used a female nom-de-plume.
Brief summary: thieves and baddies falling out with each other.
Personally, I think it is the work of a heavily subsidised student wasting our money instead of getting on with his ( and it’s likely to be a chappie!) revision!
Nothing to see here, says Chick, move along.
But who knows?
And isn’t it great fun?
This is hilarious. My theory: Charlotte = Charlotte Sq, Edinburgh. Fakes = All fronts for a man who operates out of said square.
Do I get Dusty Bin?
i’m not allowed to stay up this late reading!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/141745358/Budgets
Highlights – McCoist on a win bonus for the Champions League.
Several players correctly identified as being useless or unsellable – all on huge weekly pay.
Amusing but nothing too exciting.
Charlotte Fakeovers @CharlotteFakes 3m Is it that easy to evade a lifetime ban from Scottish Football?
Is CF referring to himself?
Has the PR guru at Ibrox now turned against his former CEO and is using a fading hack to spread the gospel to the bears out there? Leggat has suddenly burst into print with news that is still hot off the press. It looks as if Traynor won’t be writing Green’s biography after all.
——————————————————————————–
AHMAD IN EGM BID TO ROCK RANGERS AND SCUPPER KING
RANGERS are set to be rocked by a new outbreak of boardroom infighting.
And I can reveal that sacked commercial director Imran Ahmad is the man behind the moves to call an Extraordinary General Meeting.
The news comes after yet another leak to BBC Scotland, this time to Al Lamont, who Imran Ahmad appears to have a compliant conduit to, and Chris McLaughlin, who Ahmad is suspected of having previously leaked to
Ahmad and former chief executive Charles Green, who is still a director, will now join forces with London lawyer Chris Morgan, who legally represents the Blue Pitch Holdings investment in Rangers, plus the Easdale brothers.
They want to force an EGM and have Morgan and one of the Easdale brothers bulldoze their way into the Blue Room.
The panic move comes in response to the news that Rangers man Dave King is actively looking to buy up a £10M shareholding and try to return Rangers to its roots.
Ahmad and Green seem hell-bent on trying to block the King moves and the news that they have made official and legal moves to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting is their bombshell reaction to King.
They have already lodged the required official papers with Rangers.
When the Green-Ahmad-Easdales-Chris Morgan-Blue Pitch Holdings stake in Rangers is added together it gives this alliance around 20 per cent of the Ibrox shareholding, which is more than enough for the the power to vote their men onto the board.
And even if those directors – hard man Cockney lawyer Morgan and one of the Easdales – were to be outvoted at any future board meeting, the Green-Ahmad-Easdale-Chris Morgan-Blue Pitch Holdings cabal can continue to call Extraordinary General Meetings on a regular basis and disrupt the day-to-day running of Rangers.
It would seem that Ahmad wants to wreak revenge of Rangers for his sacking after he was caught leaking confidential company information to a website.
Rangers supporters can get set for another summer of uncertainty and bloody infighting, with the future of the club once more placed in danger.
The best hope for a swift end to it all is if Dave King can persuade enough of the other shareholders to sell to him. That would allow King to take on the Green-Ahmad-Easdales-Chris Morgan-Blue Pitch Holdings cabal.
Budget. Doc true but fake. CW would have fired the lot.
@ john clarke
Thanks for the brief summary. Did Phil McB not say the other day that civil war was breaking out within the boardroom at Ibrox!
Sorry I’m still laughing at the MBB offering McCoist a win bonus for all those CL games. Failsafe cost cutting measures.
And I was going to mention Joni Mitchell and Midlake and Fleet Foxes but I’ll leave it till tomorrow….
Araminta Moonbeam QC says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 23:41
0 0 Rate This
——————————————
I can’t work out if it unimportant or not really.
Isn’t it further evidence that Imran Ahmed (and Green) and Craig Whyte have been working together all along? Shouldn’t that bring the attention of a number of regulatory bodies?
Confusing.
On another note I trust someone is downloading copies of all the documents and sound clips for future reference?
I can see moves to shut Charlotte up being pretty swift at this rate, would not be surprised to see all the documents, recordings etc etc removed from the internet within 48 hours.
Araminta Moonbeam QC says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 23:39
Why is the recipients email address redacted in the version posted online.
Two options as I see it.
1. The version they have already has it redacted.
2. They chose to redact it themselves.
Third potential option, always worth considering, it is all made up.
Oh and, how does one “terminate” contracts. Presumably as part of an insolvency event, such as administration.
However, that is a matter entirely for the administrator and no-one else. The board / owners have no say as far as I am aware. The administrators have full control of everything.
My reading of events – looks as if the Charles Green side of the camp is fighting to control the Club.
vforvernacular says:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 at 23:53
I’m sure that plenty of copies of the documents will be taken 🙂
@chipm0nk
If you’re CW, you redact it yourself prior to your leak.
This was dated May 23rd 2012, so they are already in admin and the CVA is about to be rejected, despite Graham Spiers ‘no media figment’ tweet. By this stage HMRC would have told them it wasn’t a go-fer, so the contract would be breached on liquidation.
I think that the writer of the “budgets” doc got a bit tired once they got to bedoya “sack him if he is on more than 5k”. All the other salaries were known to the author??? Why not Bedoya.
Seems a bit tommy taxi driver to me