The Immortality Project

Avatar By

We received this recording yesterday. It is of the Jim …

Comment on The Immortality Project by TSFM.

We received this recording yesterday. It is of the Jim Spence comments on SS the other evening.

The actual comment is at around 3m10s but listen to the first three minutes for context. The clip is the entire discussion on the TRFC boardroom changes, topped an tailed to exclude other discussion items.

https://soundcloud.com/xassdguocvrx/jim-spence-sportsoundedit

TSFM Also Commented

The Immortality Project
paulsatim says:

October 4, 2013 at 1:11 am (Edit)
Superb as ever BRHT!!

Where’s it gone??
_________________________________________________________

Its a new blog πŸ™‚


The Immortality Project
Goldstein has pm’d me to say that he does not old TSFM in low esteem as I had earlier inferred and reported. He also says he has no connection whatsoever with Bartin Main and tat he only heard of him for the first time today.

My inference was based on some remarks he made earlier – and his peculiar habit of deleting his posts so that people were replying to empty spaces. Goldstein says my inference is incorrect, and I accept that. He also says he might need to delete his posts, and cannot promise not to do so after he has posted. he understands that this is not the way of the blog and we have agreed to part company.

My apologies to Goldstein for my earlier statement.


The Immortality Project
Now that Bartin has embarked on another about turn on CtH in conjunction with spreading disinformation about this blog;

No one is banned from here, not Charlotte (despite my own confirmed belief that she is a fraud), nor Goldstein.

One wonders why, with the low esteem in which they both appear to hold TSFM, that Bartin and Goldstein are keen to suddenly join us. As I said earlier, everyone is welcome here as long as they stay within the spirit of the blog. The sort of language that Bartin has been using about individuals, and all of us collectively, looks as if it is designed to have us talking about him and not discussing the real issues. It is certainly not in the spirit of TSFM, so I hope that in future the tone will be amended and that kind of pejorative language is restricted to Twitter.

Please do not feed the trolls.


Recent Comments by TSFM

Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
bogsdollox says:

March 7, 2014 at 1:08 pm

Alan Price says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rangers were not the lender. The Sub-Trusts, into which Rangers made a contribution via an EBT, are the β€œlender”. Rangers gave the money away and there can be no suggestion of repayment to them.
__________________________________________________________________

Yes, but had the loans been repaid by the lendees, Rangers would have been able to apply for one themselves had they set up a sub-trust in their favour. Therefore the money would have been available to the club in times of hardship.

Or perhaps I am missing something here?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Auldheid
Res 12 is as you say important, but I am convinced that Celtic have no desire whatsoever to pursue its aims.
We could have a discussion about the possible reasons, but ultimately if DD is disinclined to seek a proper answer to these questions, then the SFA will dodge the bullet.
Thus my question to Campbellsmoney: do individual (or groups of) shareholders have locus to seek legal redress here?
Going at it in that fashion may even force Celtic and other clubs for that matter to come on board.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
I don’t know is the answer, but I doubt it. You see its not a question of law really. Its not a proper court – its a made up thing by a private body.
_________________________________________________________________

I meant a challenge in law. For example, is there a framework whereby a shareholder(s) of a club(s) could challenge the outcome?

It does seem rather odd that, if a most people here believe, RFC achieved honours dishonestly and in doing so denied other clubs prize-money and opportunity that those clubs are reluctant to seek redress.

My guess I that the must have something to lose by bringing that up – but what?

Is there a mechanism through which the SFA/SPL could be sued by individual shareholders for loss of earnings caused by a lack of proper regulation by the governing bodies.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Kicker Conspiracy

Double click or tap on the TU and it will change your vote πŸ™‚


About the author

Avatar