The Offline Game

By

HomunculusMay 23, 2016 at 14:06  That Wings Over Scotland timeline, with …

Comment on The Offline Game by Allyjambo.

HomunculusMay 23, 2016 at 14:06 
That Wings Over Scotland timeline, with pictures pretty much sums things up. Particularly in relation to when the Rangers support came onto the pitch and what was happening with regards the Rangers players at that time.
________________________

I noticed that it only took 68 seconds from the final whistle for the commentator to say that ‘Rangers’ fans were on the pitch also! At that point, looking down with the best view in the house, and with cameras to help, he hadn’t noticed any problems involving the players (some of whom are seen approaching the technical area clearly unafraid for their own safety). Doesn’t exactly tie in with the TRFC official version, does it, of heroic bears rushing to the aid of their players. Safe to say that none of the TRFC supporters who entered the pitch were aware of anything that may, or may not, have happened to their players until some time after the event. They went on to kick a Hibby (or, in their vernacular, a Fenian Bstrd). I’d suggest that as they, the bears, entered the field of play, there was more malice in their intentions than in any of the Hibs fans as they crossed the boundary wall!

Allyjambo Also Commented

The Offline Game
PAU1MART1NJUNE 8, 2016 at 15:38 
Relaunch as the vanguardy yin ???
________

I’m sure that when the original proprietors of that newspaper chose the name ‘The Guardian’ they were not indicating that they would be guarding the interests of the ‘establishment’, rather that they would be the guardians of, and endeavouring to ensure, the honesty and integrity of those in power!


The Offline Game
Corrupt officialJune 8, 2016 at 13:18 
The Guardian have cancelled the Res 12 advert in rather mysterious circumstances. 

THE UNMENTIONABLE RESOLUTION 12 AND THE GUARDIAN


_________________—–

What can I say? Many years ago my distrust of the British media was born and I stopped reading newspapers, even those I found lying around, but now they have reached a new low. There can be little doubt that the Guardian is bowing to pressure from God knows where, and I shudder to think just what power must lie with people who would stoop so low as to prevent a football story reaching a wider audience. It’s only a bloody game! This is becoming ever more sinister.

I don’t like the Masons, but I haven’t bought into the feeling amongst many ‘Rangers Scandal’ commentators that there is a massive ‘Masonic plot’ afoot, but there can be little doubt that ‘Rangers Men’ hold great sway in that secretive organisation, and that members of it infest the British media (with similar secret organisations doing similar in countries elsewhere)!

But in an industry that is virtually on it’s knees, that someone should decide to pull an already paid for advert, beggars belief, and indicates more than just the odd bear reporter with influence pulling the strings.

Far from weakening our beliefs about Scottish football, this just serves to bear them out, and take it even further into the realms of the ‘establishment’!

Anyone who isn’t disgusted by this latest turn of events must buy into everything that the Kings and Murrays of this world want us to!

I’m pretty certain there will be a few less copies of the Guardian sold as a result of this!


The Offline Game
Interesting post from John James. He appears to have done some research of the kind alien to the SMSM, and has come up with some interesting stuff on Ashley’s ‘climb down’ and ‘humiliation’.

Justin Barnes, Ashley’s new boy on the RR board, is a registered trade mark lawyer, so one might think more of a strengthening of SD/MA’s position than any sort of ‘humiliation’. Barnes, apparently, was responsible for setting up the contract, so probably knows a lot more than anyone at Ibrox about it’s structure. If Barnes doesn’t know of any loopholes, with his first hand knowledge and obvious expertise, I wonder how much it must have cost TRFC if they have engaged a leading expert in the field able to outsmart this man! Warbo’s bonus maybe?

I continue to have the feeling that this may well be King’s last huzzah, throwing everything but the kitchen sink at gaining control of the merchandising and, if successful, making enough in instant sales to pay off the legal costs with enough left to see them through the season. If it fails, well it won’t be his fault if the club goes under…

https://johnjamessite.com/2016/06/08/getting-shirty/


Recent Comments by Allyjambo

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Big PinkJanuary 2, 2018 at 13:54 
AJI suspect the TDs are not from SFM folk (remember the ratings are available to all manner of trolls). It is a disgusting world-view if made in earnest. A shocking way to score a point if not.
_________________-

I didn’t, for a moment, suspect they were from anyone who posts here, even the more prolific troll posters are better than that, I am sure. 

For some time now I have had the feeling that there is someone, or some people, coming on here and just TDing a number of posts without bothering to read their content, either out of malice or as some sort of concerted effort on behalf of people with reason to dislike our message. It really is quite strange how, suddenly, a number of posts receive one, two or occasionally three thumbs down in very short order, and often posts like uth’s, that could offend no one, receive these petty TDs as a result. 

I can honestly say that I have never read anything from our regular, or occasional, posters that might suggest they would TD anything relating to that terrible day. I include, of course, all supporters of Celtic and RFC/TRFC who have, over the years, made their arguments on SFM. My experience of Celtic supporters talking of that day is one that leaves me certain in the knowledge that only the basest of their support (and we all have them) were not badly effected by the disaster and in full sympathy with the deceased, their families and the wider Rangers support. 

I can still remember that night, sitting in the Queens Arms in Edinburgh, watching the death count rising on the TV, waiting for one of our mates we knew was at the game, getting more and more nervous until he appeared. It had a lasting effect on me.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
upthehoopsJanuary 2, 2018 at 08:52 29 2
Rate This
On this day in 1971, the Ibrox disaster happened during a Rangers v Celtic game at Ibrox. 66 fans died in a crush. Some of us remember that day, some of us may even have been there, while some of us would not even be on this earth at the time. We are all football fans. Nobody should go to a football match and never return home. Rest in Peace.
_____________

Wow! I know we are not meant to put much store on the thumbs up or down, but two people have given thumbs down to this post! Who on earth could find fault with a post respecting the dead from the Ibrox disaster?

It kind of confirms my belief that there are people coming onto this site who don’t read the posts, but are assigned with the task of creating the appearance that there is some disagreement with posts that mostly criticise Rangers(IL) and TRFC and hit the TD button without thought.

Alternatively, of course, it could just be that others, like myself, have difficulty hitting the correct symbol on tablets or mobile phones, I certainly hope that is the case here.

Thanks to Upthehoops for reminding us of that sad day, something we should do every year as a mark of respect for those who died on Scottish football’s worst day.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
DarkbeforedawnJanuary 2, 2018 at 03:48 
Stevie BC, the issue with declaring himself bankrupt is it stops him holding any director role in a company in the UK and possibly South Africa. I can’t see him doing that “for the sake of the club”. I think like Murray before him he likes the limelight. He knows very well the best option for the club would be resign as any acting party in the club and still provide the soft loans. It would take all scrutiny away from the club and could leave the chairman role to someone more respected such as Alistair Johnston. That would stop the risk of the TOP ruling having such a huge impact on the club. It’s the selfless and obvious choice to make and he could still be seen as the saviour from abroad saving the club through loans, but he wouldn’t get the same exposure he so much craves. His defiance is what will lead to his downfall and his selfishness could lead lead to the downfall of the club.
_______________________

DBD, though I used your above post to highlight the impossibility of separating club from company, I have to agree, to some extent, with the thrust of the post. While I am not sure that by declaring himself bankrupt that King could escape the wrath of the TOP and CoS, he isn’t going to do anything for the benefit of your club if it doesn’t benefit him, or save him, at the same time.

That said, however, King’s ‘ownership’ of the NOAL Trust was established in court to the judge’s satisfaction, and I doubt that he would get away with making further loans to RIFC plc through it or any other hidden avenue, once declared bankrupt. Indeed, despite my limited knowledge of bankruptcy laws, I am certain that King (or anyone else) can’t just announce bankruptcy and clear themselves of all fiscal responsibilities, they have to prove they have no money to meet their debts, and as far as we know, King doesn’t have any – and if he had, the court would make sure the funds in his NOAL Trust would be used to meet them, as far as possible, with, I am sure, an investigation into what other (disguised)investments he holds. One thing’s for sure, he would not be allowed to ‘lend’ any money to RIFC/TRFC, and, if he does, indeed, have substantial debts, his creditors might well force the return of his existing RIFC loans to meet his debts.

One thing’s for sure, the law will not allow someone to avoid the consequences of breaking the laws and regulations of the land by availing one’s self of the laws of bankruptcy! While a little tax cheating scrote like Barry Ferguson might get away with transferring his assets to his wife, just prior to receiving his tax bill, King and his money are already on the court’s radar and I doubt that even his Masonic connections would be enough to let him get away with further fraudulent behaviour.

Something I am sure of, and has to be considered before wondering if bankruptcy is a way out for both/either King or RIFC, and that is – you have to have debts that you demonstrably can’t meet before you can petition for bankruptcy. Unless King has very substantial debts, that outweigh, at least, the funds held in the NOAL Trust, then he has no grounds to declare himself bankrupt.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
DarkbeforedawnJanuary 2, 2018 at 03:48 
Stevie BC, the issue with declaring himself bankrupt is it stops him holding any director role in a company in the UK and possibly South Africa. I can’t see him doing that “for the sake of the club”. I think like Murray before him he likes the limelight. He knows very well the best option for the club would be resign as any acting party in the club and still provide the soft loans. It would take all scrutiny away from the club and could leave the chairman role to someone more respected such as Alistair Johnston. That would stop the risk of the TOP ruling having such a huge impact on the club. It’s the selfless and obvious choice to make and he could still be seen as the saviour from abroad saving the club through loans, but he wouldn’t get the same exposure he so much craves. His defiance is what will lead to his downfall and his selfishness could lead lead to the downfall of the club.
_________________

Hi, DBD, and a Happy New Year to you.

While your recent posts have been pretty good, showing a realistic approach to what’s happening at your club, might I ask how it could be that the chairman of RIFC’s selfishness, and I presume you include his dishonesty in that, could lead to your club’s downfall, if, as you’ve previously claimed, the club is separate from the company? Surely, in your belief structure, it would only be the company, TRFC Ltd, that would ‘fall down’, and the club would just sit around, responsible for none of the inherent financial chicanery of the ‘overspend our way to success’ ethos that permeates at Ibrox, until some new ‘football company’ is set up to carry the can again!

I know it’s a bit early in the year to reintroduce the OC/NC debate, but I am wondering if you’ve, perhaps, come to realise that the idea that a football club can, for some skewed reason, escape the consequences of it’s own greed, is pretty ludicrous?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
ODDJOBJANUARY 1, 2018 at 13:42
Allyjambo,Thanks.I also suspect that the assignation of ” ra deeds” would provoke an angry response in some quarters
___________

And I suspect that the assignation of ‘ra deeds’, should it ever come to pass, might well be the last throw of the dice! What’s more, once any assets are used as security, it reduces the amount the current lenders are likely to get in the event of liquidation. It may well be that the directors, who are now refusing to give more loans, have, rather than reached the end of their free funds, decided that the lending has reached a level greater than, or close to, the total value of the group’s assets.

It’s one thing lending without security when in a position to ensure there is enough in the pot to, more or less, cover the amount of the loans, it’s an altogether different thing once someone else gets that security!

Whatever the accounts give as a value for the fixed and current assets, the directors will all have a very good idea of the realisable value of those assets (particularly the heritable asset value), and should total creditors begin to outstrip that value, they may well begin to wonder if it’s time to call in the administrators. Granting security over some of the heritable assets would only hasten the moment for unpleasant decisions.

If PMGB is correct in saying King is looking out for loans secured on the club’s heritable assets, then I am certain that the rest of the directors would carry out proper due diligence on the potential lenders before granting any security. Not that they have any dodgy characters in their midst, or anything, just that they are canny businessmen.


About the author