The Offline Game

Avatar By

My understanding, and no more than that is that the …

Comment on The Offline Game by Homunculus.

My understanding, and no more than that is that the situation with regards SDI, TRFC and RR is as follows.

RR, owned jointly between the other two, hold a Worldwide licence to produce and sell any official Rangers merchandise. That has another 6 years to run. 

TRFC own the Intellectual Property (crests, badges etc) which relate to Rangers.

TRFC have withdrawn the permission for RR to use that IP. In spite of the fact that they are joint owners of RR.

We would appear to be in a position where no-one other that RR can produce or sell anything Rangers related. However that company cannot use any of the crests, badges etc. Therefore they effectively cannot produce any new Rangers merchandise either. 

Basically no-one can currently produce new Rangers merchandise, including replica kit etc.

As I said a wee while ago, a Mexican stand-off. 

(If you look at the SD website you will see they are happily selling the old kit.)

Homunculus Also Commented

The Offline Game
NEEPHEIDJUNE 1, 2016 at 09:39

===========================

We will have to agree to disagree on this one.

Celtic’s current market cap is £68m

If I had £40m to throw away I would rather have 58% of Celtic than a similar slice of Rangers.

I think the assets, including player registrations have greater value, I think the chance of winning things is greater, I think the chance of competing for CL tens of millions is greater, I think the prospect of bringing in substantial sponsorship and merchandising income is greater, there is a lack of a binding contract with Mike Ashley for the next 6 years strangling income, I see no dubiety re the ownership of Celtic’s assets, I believe that the Co-op provide a nice borrowing facility at favourable terms.

I also think anyone investing £40m in Celtic would be mad. I can’t even imagine anyone doing similar with Rangers.


The Offline Game
I think Celtic will win the premiership in the coming season with Aberdeen and Hearts fighting out second place just the same as this season. A lot will go down to luck with regards injuries throughout the season and which club is better covered for loss of players.

My money would be on Rangers for fourth, from what I have seen they have been rather lucky with injuries in the season just ended. Particularly with such a small squad.


The Offline Game
BIG PINK
MAY 31, 2016 at 17:39
================================

The Rangers business model was seriously flawed for a long time.

Part of the reason is the myth that Celtic and Rangers were pretty much on a par commercially. That was simply not true. There are three obvious differences.

1, Large sponsorship deal, outwith the norm. Nike was worth an additional £5m per annum to Celtic. That was in effect “free money” as there was no real cost attached.

2, Higher gate income. Realistically Celtic had 4,000 additional paying customers for home games. Say £25 for 18 games. That would be another £1.8m. Again little additional cost. Laughing about how accurate the figures are for attendees does not change how many actually paid for a seat. 

3, Higher merchandising revenues. Call that another £1.2m, I think it might have been more but it makes the numbers easier.

In my opinion, prior to Rangers being liquidated, Rangers domestic income was about £8m less than Celtics (pre tax), and Celtic could not break even based on domestic football alone. They needed European income, at the very least every couple of years.

Rangers were totally dependent on European income, much more so than Celtic given a similar cost base. When he club failed to reach the CL or even Europa in their last season an already all too obvious fate became inevitable. 


Recent Comments by Homunculus

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
He has a logo already


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
TONY
JANUARY 2, 2018 at 16:03
===========================

Not the humility then.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
TONY
JANUARY 2, 2018 at 15:37
==============================

You guessed, what gave it away.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Our hero, and he really is a hero is at it again with his self-effacing prose.

“I cover every issue and more often than not you will read it here first. If I were a Superhero and not a mere blogger I would literally champion the oppressed. However as one who believes  that the pen is mightier than the sword I revert to keystrokes. I have never had a tattoo but if I ever decided to go down this route I would choose the Palestinian flag. However as this might offend one of my my best friends, Max in Tel Aviv, I continue to demure.”

I’m assuming he means demur, however he could well be a shy, modest lady. 

The heroism continues

“When it comes to murderers who remain at large this site will continue to hold the most the most odious mass murderer since Pol Pot, Tony Blair, to account. Given half a chance I would fell him with a single head-butt or induce irreparable damage to his frontal lobes with an upward punch to his nose. Suffice to say I have sufficient training in martial arts to make this blow count. People like Blair are immune to the pen. This lily livered pansy deserves the sword.”

Can you guess who it is yet. 


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/15715129.New_poll_shows_fans_are_overwhelmingly_in_favour_of_moving_away_from_Hampden/

THE case for retaining Hampden as the home of Scottish football has been dealt a blow after a survey found just 15 per cent of fans were happy to stay put.

…..

The Scottish Football Supporters Association (SFSA) carried out a survey of just under 3,000 of its members and found only a sixth wanted to see major internationals and cup finals staged at Hampden.


About the author

Avatar