The Real Battle Begins?

By

Tommythehat says: Sunday, December 16, 2012 at 21:01 blu says: Sunday, December …

Comment on The Real Battle Begins? by blu.

tommythehat says:
Sunday, December 16, 2012 at 21:01
blu says:
Sunday, December 16, 2012 at 20:47
——————————————————————————————————————————–
Thanks Jean, and i wouldnt change a thing either.

Blu – It’s just a bit of banter – besides it’s actually quite apt considering – lets be honest here, FF is a rabid website, the person in question is a rabid contributor on said website – Violla!! Dingwall becomes Mingwall – I thinks it’s fair enough – and no – i aint that particular Tommy:)
======================================
Cheers Tommy – thanks for taking the time to reply – each to their own and all that, it just doesn’t appeal to me.

blu Also Commented

The Real Battle Begins?
layman00 says:

Tuesday, December 18, 2012 at 02:23

12 thumbs down for saying if that was a genuine leggit blog the writer must be drinking too much caffeine and not getting enough sleep!?

Are comments like that to offensive these days for this site or have i been thumbed down 12 times by leggit??
=================================================
layman00, I think you’re just getting a bit of stick because it’s a spoof site and this was pointed out a few times yesterday before you posted. It’s also been pointed that it would be a mistake to visit the ‘original’.


The Real Battle Begins?
Not The Huddle Malcontent says:
Monday, December 17, 2012 at 12:28

wonder what Dark Mi….sorry, Mark Dingwalls agenda is???

=================================================
NTHM – if I’d only known it was a spoonerism!


The Real Battle Begins?
doontheslope says:
Monday, December 17, 2012 at 12:21
7 1 i
Rate This

Blu

I hope that Tommy rethinks and reposts.

I made a decision a while ago about how I would refer to Rangers(IL)/Newco/Sevco etc.. I decided on Sevco.

I base that decision on the following: If Sevco wish to be known as Rangers, they must pay the debt. I will be quite happy to accept them as a continuation of Rangers if this is done. Until such time, as far as I am concerned, they are Sevco.

==============================================================
doontheslope – I’m sorry for dragging this sorry matter out further but I should have been clearer. I inferred from your post that you believed that all of those who posted about the use of the term “Mingwall” were Sevco fans. This isn’t so, and even if it was, I still believe that winning an argument by force of evidence and reasoned argument is the best way to go. RTC did a pretty good job using that approach.


Recent Comments by blu

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
I seem to recall that part of Dave King’s settlement with the South African Revenue Service was a  requirement that Mr King’s family repatriate business assets held overseas into South Africa. Has anyone any insight into how this sits with NOAL being BVI-based?


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
easyJamboDecember 20, 2017 at 12:44
EJ, I’ve no cause to doubt you or Hearts directors or the company auditors. It’s a fact though that people will speculate on these matters, often getting things completely wrong, intentionally or simply through ignorance.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One

easyJamboDecember 20, 2017 at 11:23

blu December 20, 2017 at 11:16 There is an element of truth in Tangoed’s assertion about the need for transparency though – I’m sure there’s plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback as to the identity of the mysterious benefactors. ===================== There is indeed plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback about the benefactor(s).
A couple of well informed posters have all but confirmed that the money has come from partners in an Edinburgh investment company.

EJ,
I’m sure that you and others closer to the club will have a very good idea who these people are but as long as the club is asked to keep their identities private there will be speculation and aspersions cast from the east of Edinburgh and further afield.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One

HomunculusDecember 20, 2017 at 10:57
I’ll decline from commenting further, the majority of members here seem to think it is acceptable to conjecture that Hearts are being funded by the proceeds of crime.

For the avoidance of doubt Homunculus, I agree with your challenge to Tangoed – his subsequent response confirms it is simple speculation, possibly mischievous. My question was more focused on what might be considered as money laundering, tangential and less important than your challenge.
There is an element of truth in Tangoed’s assertion about the need for transparency though – I’m sure there’s plenty speculation on Jambos Kickback as to the identity of the mysterious benefactors.
 


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
Homunculus, I don’t think that money laundering was referred to by Tangoed, no doubt they’ll respond to fully explain.


About the author