Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?

By

In response to this he got the following tweet: RK ‏@sherbetdab66 @stephenfry …

Comment on Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show? by Tartawulver.

In response to this he got the following tweet:

RK ‏@sherbetdab66
@stephenfry The whole #rangersfamily will sign it if you retweet http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/42143 please.
Retweeted by Stephen Fry

Which is a e-petition for the following:

HMRC confidential info leak
—————————————————–
It is a bit of a tactical risk to raise this idea surely, because if someone was to put forward a call for signatures for a petition asking for debate of some relevant aspect of ex-Rangers’ approach to tax avoidance, for example, it would in all likelihood garner many more votes than this will.

Tartawulver Also Commented

Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?
Tom English @TomEnglishSport 23m
rangerstaxcase was a phenomenon. Total respect for the quality of that blog’s information. But it became bitter and pompous and lost its way
————————————————————
Tom English draws wrong conclusions. RTC’s blog (and this one) accepted/accept people’s conjecture, because often we had/have so little by way of facts to build on, given that the Scottish news media had/have no taste, in general, for asking probing questions and joining the dots. Some mad theories were put forward at times, but then again, many of the factual aspects of the Rangers tax avoidance story and its continuing aftermath were scarcely more credible. Against that backdrop, RTC and this blog have allowed discussion, and whenever debate lapsed into aggression, it was quickly slapped down (which stands in stark contrast to many other sites that have discussed the Rangers issues. I’m sure no names need to be mentioned). When compared with most single-topic blogs on the internet, it has been a model of openness and civility.

Mr English, you have gained respect on this site because you are prepared to challenge what you see. But bitter, pompous and lost its way? Lift up your eyes, what you are describing is your own profession and those who surround you in their miserable handling of this affair.


Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?
Robert Coyle says:
Friday, November 23, 2012 at 09:10

—————————————————–
It is a bit of a tactical risk to raise this idea surely, because if someone was to put forward a call for signatures for a petition asking for debate of some relevant aspect of ex-Rangers’ approach to tax avoidance, for example, it would in all likelihood garner many more votes than this will.
————————————————–
Celtic should now come out with a public statement offering full support to David Murray and oldclub rangers in their quest for a full public inquirey into everything that’s went on
————————————————–
No need for Celtic to do anything, and in fact that would be equally divisive and counterproductive.

As I understand it, anyone can propose a petition, the website is a government channel for encouraging debate. My point was that supporters of MANY clubs would vote for such a petition, outnumbering the Rangers supporters, which is why it was a tactical error of them to push this idea.


Why the Beast of Armageddon Failed to Show?
From RTC blog
“This blog brought light to a matter of public interest. This blog has been accurate on all of the major points of the case except the one that matters most to date- the FTT outcome.”
——————————————
Another reason for being on this side of the debate with the people who can be self-critical and display a touch of humility, rather than with those who bray about their supposed superiority and prefer bombast and intimidation to reasoned argument.


Recent Comments by Tartawulver

On Grounds for Judicial Review
So it might seem Jimbo!

Also, good point, about facilities for football fans in wheelchairs. All it takes is for the fittest and ablest of us to break a leg to suddenly find ourselves ‘disabled’ and discover just how many barriers there are to doing everyday things. Let’s hope clubs can be more accommodating, and that any new stands that are built make appropriate allowance.


On Grounds for Judicial Review
Interview in the Guardian today with Eni Aluko about the way the English FA dealt with her complaint.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/aug/21/eni-aluko-interview-race-difficult-situation

It contains the following, which put me in mind of another FA’s approach to the mechanics of rigorous investigation (my use of bold text and terms in square brackets).

‘…seeing a lot of half-truths, a lot of misrepresentations and a lot of insinuations…’
‘How could I trust the process if the FA couldn’t be bothered to speak to the key people?’
‘The findings don’t explain why certain people…weren’t spoken to. Yet the FA would like us to take it as an unequivocal conclusion. People weren’t spoken to under oath. People weren’t cross-examined. It’s not a high court judge. It’s a paid barrister’s opinion, based on half the evidence, without speaking to key witnesses – yet speaking to [people] who have a vested interest…I believe those [people] are terrified to speak out. They are not going to speak out and…I wouldn’t either in their position.’
‘I empathise with the barrister, if I’m honest. I believe she was deliberately chosen… Her name has been plastered everywhere. I believe she has been given only half the information.’
‘The FA…had ignored key evidence so that’s why my lawyers wrote to them saying: ‘This is not a genuine search for the truth’


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
The Rangers drubbed various teams of assorted professionals / semi-pros / amateurs on their rise through the divisions. But that was only to be expected as their wages were vastly higher than their opponents.

Celtic hammered the Rangers, but that was only to be expected as their wages were vastly higher than their opponents.
 
Barcelona stuffed Celtic, but that was only to be expected as their wages were vastly higher than their opponents.

Football has always been dominated by big teams (usually big city teams able to attract higher attendances and hence matchday receipts), but now the the world game is well on the way to ossifying into structures based purely on financial categories, rather than competitiveness. The opposite of the US model of drafts and the sharing of resources to constantly regenerate competition, it is only a matter of time before enough people get fed up watching the same fare over and over again. A 7-0 might once have been an astonishing result, these days you just look at the two teams, check their categories, and you’d probably already factored in about 5 of those goals as the potential result anyway.

My generation was raised on football being in the bloodstream, a fixed number of big teams but rough round the edges in terms of the appearance of Ferguson’s Aberdeen, McLean’s Dundee United, Kendall’s Everton, Clough’s Forest, and so on. But we are witnessing the death of football, at least until it regenerates itself, not as yet another bigger (world? interplanetary?) league, but ones that are based on competitiveness.


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
The Rangers are sorely in need of some PR advice on when a period of silence might be to their advantage. Empty barrels, most noise and all that.


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
wottpiSeptember 12, 2016 at 08:56 
When everything is going so well at Celtic Park just now why do these imbeciles continually want to score classless own goals against their club?
———————————————————–
The ‘hanging dolls’ were worse than classless, and they were more than insults only to Rangers supporters. They were an affront to decency. How anyone could have such a lack of understanding as to how they would be perceived is beyond me. As I think Angela Haggery tweeted, they also allow an equivalence to be given to the actions of the two supports, 1-1 when seen against trashing the stadium toilets. The actions also support the ‘they’re both the same’ point of view. Crass, disturbing, malevolent, idiocy.

I doff my cap to the Celtic support for their support of the Palestinians. I hope your supporters will condemn the ‘hanging doll’ event unequivocally.


About the author