Why We Need to Change


Scapaflow says: Member: (1316 comments) July 23, 2015 at 2:16 …

Comment on Why We Need to Change by MoreCelticParanoia.

scapaflow says:
Member: (1316 comments)

July 23, 2015 at 2:16 pm

MoreCelticParanoia says:
Member: (98 comments)
July 23, 2015 at 1:40 pm

The object is to get money back, not pour more in

The bears are being asked to fund a lifestyle Mr King would like to return to

Spot on

The irony is he is pretty much right. The core of any club’s funding must be its’ supporters if it is to be sustainable i.e. survive.

The fact that this is only revolutionary talk in respect of The Rangers FHC tells you much about why they are where thay are now.

MoreCelticParanoia Also Commented

Why We Need to Change
tayred says:
Member: (182 comments)

August 21, 2015 at 3:08 pm

Apologies MCP – my use of the phrase “dragging down” was wrong. What was actually said was “although this will only bring Celtic down to match other teams level”

Fair dos TR. 🙂

Agreed re JC. Here be monsters right enough!

Why We Need to Change
tayred says:

August 21, 2015 at 2:58 pm

I don’t think we’re so very far apart on the issue of resource allocation as I previously posted I have sympathy with the view that there should be more of an even share both in Scotland and Europe.

As for the “dragging down” – the original poster can speak for himself, but to me you are reading far too much into that statement and seeing what you apparently want to see.

As for John Collins – in your eyes he’s obviously committed some sort of crime, when in the eyes of many others he didn’t actually say anything that Derek McInnes hadn’t said himself other than expressng it in slightly more blunt terms.

Why We Need to Change
tayred says:
Member: (180 comments)

August 21, 2015 at 2:22 pm

Jeesh, you have to be careful in this place :).

Not really, but consistency would be nice.

Your lengthy rebuttal doesn’t disguise the fact your assertion is other clubs can’t compete with Celtic at present without a greater slice of the cake. Then went on to bristle with agitation when someone made a similar observation. No-one said anything about “dragging down” Celtic.

The almost universally acknowledged fact (including by yourself) is that Celtic are stronger financially and on the park due to greater access to resource. All that was said was removing some of the resource – if and when it becomes available – certainly isn’t going to make Celtic stronger and a weakened Celtic will be more vulnerable to competition from other clubs.

Nothing really to get your knickers in a twist about and very unfair to compare with supremacist mindsets that exist elsewhere.

[ removed – ad hominem ]

Recent Comments by MoreCelticParanoia

LNS – A Summary
Big Pink18th November 2015 at 10:33 am# Yet another lazy journalist plays the sectarian card. Tired, Predictable, Irrelevant, Incorrect. _______________________________

Tired, Ridiculous, Incorrect, Predictable, Excrement.

i.e. TRIPE

By the way, if the religious dimension had any relevance – which it doesn’t – surely it would be some form of self-loathing type hatred as a majority of fans of all other teams of any religious persuasion are likely to be Protestant too. Just shows how warped and delusional this kind of “thinking” is.

Whose assets are they anyway?
STVGrant and Gerry McCulloch obfuscating common sense on behalf of cheats on Twitter e.g. “how do you know Rangers wouldn’t still have bought the same players without EBTs?”. A bit depressing as those two were previously partial to a lamb diet but today have gone full succulent

The Case for a New SFA.
upthehoops7th October 2015 at 7:13 am# I notice another puff piece in today’s Herald from Chris Jack. If the time ever comes when the media want to tell the truth about Rangers (don’t laugh), I hope the likes of Jack have got something else to fall back on. I guess I’ve just wasted time typing those three lines. Off to work now, have a great day everyone. _____________________________________________________________________ https://johnjamessite.wordpress.com/2015/09/23/the-anatomy-of-an-underfunded-coup-detat/ “Anyone who wishes to view how this works should take a look at the output of Chris ‘Union’ Jack at The Herald. Rangers, the client, instruct Level 5, the agent, to promote season ticket sales. A deal is then struck with The Herald commercial team for what is known as a promotional package. A junior hack, Chris Jack, is then provided with the bullet points as written by James Traynor or Stephen Kerr that he cuts and pastes into an article that gives the impression that it’s a piece of sports reportage, when it’s true purpose is season ticket promotion. Other examples of Level 5’s handiwork can be seen at one of Trinity Mirror’s stable, The Sunday Mail under several by-lines.”

Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma
Carfins Finest20th September 2015 at 3:06 pm#

0-3 Aberdeen at Hearts HT. Surely the dominance of Aberdeen FC from the start of the season cannot be good for Scottish Football.

The sooner TRFC are promoted to the SPL to provide Aberdeen with some much needed competition the better. If Aberdeen go on to win the title in their absence it will surely be worth very little.

On the other hand, winning a first division consisting of largely part-time teams is an achievement worthy of Rangers’ greatest ever manager.

Can I have some :slamb: :slamb: :slamb: now?

Redistribution of Football Income – The Human Dilemma
ianagain17th September 2015 at 10:04 pm#
See the things people say (very rich people)
No need to go to 2nd hearing:

This sentence caught my eye:

“The team was forced into the High Court on Monday as a result of failing to pay one month’s PAYE (income tax and national insurance) to HMRC, only for the case to be adjourned until Friday, September 18.”

Whereas some sporting “companies” are allowed to rack up half a year’s worth of PAYE & NI with no action, yet claim to be the victims of some sort of vindictive persecution.

About the author