A Sanity Clause for Xmas?

By

No idea if this is accurate….apparently Durrant been told to …

Comment on A Sanity Clause for Xmas? by parttimearab.

No idea if this is accurate….apparently Durrant been told to stay away from Ibrox for 14 days… ❓

http://www.ibroxnoise.co.uk/2014/12/durrant-latest-victim-of-nightmare-at.html?

parttimearab Also Commented

A Sanity Clause for Xmas?
justshatered says:
January 19, 2015 at 9:15 pm

No one, unless they have an emotional attachment, will now invest in this venture because there is no return to be made.
=============================
Unless your Charles Green 😈


A Sanity Clause for Xmas?
Wrt Dave King’s “fit and proper” status and the SFA I’ve been keeping half an eye on the situation at Leeds Utd and Massimo Cellino.

My reading of the article below is that the EFL only take convictions into account in line with the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act.

In Cellino’s case one year.

Different footballing jurisdiction but same legal one (for this particular piece of legislation).

Will the SFA have to take the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act into account as well ❓

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jan/19/massimo-cellino-loses-appeal-leeds-director


A Sanity Clause for Xmas?
John Clark says:
January 17, 2015 at 8:09 pm
—————————
Thanks John, nice and clear, looks right to me…Will be interesting to see how this develops.


Recent Comments by parttimearab

Small Price to Pay?

NEEPHEIDFEBRUARY 26, 2017 at 12:40
JohnJames is stating as a fact that the Dundee Utd players have been told that they are going into administration on Monday. I really hope that he’s got this one badly wrong

How can I put this – complete and utter pish – like most of his output


The Day I was on the Scotland U-23 Bench

JIMBOJANUARY 6, 2017 at 16:01
‘The Rangers’   I’ve often wondered how Charles Green got away with such a miniscule change to the name.  As I understood it, under the phoenix laws any new business arising from the ashes had to have a significantly different name so that it could not be seen to go into liquidation, shed the debt and start again unharmed, name intact

IIRC (and it is a while ago now) permission was sought (by CG) from and granted by the liquidators BDO.
Perhaps someone else who kept notes or has a better memory than me might confirm this?


The Causes of Crime
The whole thing smacks of poetic justice you might say…

“Water, water, every where, And all the boards did shrink; Water, water, every where, Nor any drop to drink.” 
10


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
UPTHEHOOPS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 at 05:09
==========================
Wrt Ranger’s reported desire to see strict liability brought in.

The cynic would suppose that they know the other clubs are dead set against it so it makes them look good while they know it’s never gonnae happen…

Even if it turns out that Phil is correct and the Scottish government will insist they’d still look better than the others and if it’s inevitable they’ve nothing to loose.

TBH I’m struggling to understand how it could be tacked onto ground licencing without local authorities rather than the SFA becoming responsible for enforcement and sanctions which I truly doubt they’d want involved in.

Finally you’d hope they’d simply decided it was time to put a cork in the choir’s gob for their own benefit and that of football and Scottish society as a whole – well a man can dream, can’t he 09


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
WOTTPI
SEPTEMBER 28,  2016 at 18:13
==========================
I note that while the panel rejected the…error…over the designation of the club (cough) they suggested that the SFA might want to tighten up on that in future 12
Bit late 10 

I assume the charges against Rangers were dropped as the consideration of Hibs covered the same ground? 


About the author