Mr Green and Opportunity Knocks— For Aberdeen?

By

New post up …

Comment on Mr Green and Opportunity Knocks— For Aberdeen? by TSFM.

new post up

TSFM Also Commented

Mr Green and Opportunity Knocks— For Aberdeen?
martin c says:

September 1, 2013 at 9:33 pm (Edit)

Is this crushing of reputations by the PR back door? I do think there is more to this than simple extortion or revenge.

Warning shots fired at those currently in the fray, Why do we have 2 PR companies and a DOC. Those guys from DandP are no longer in the public eye. The tapes stink!
____________________________________________________________________________

I have to say that my initial reaction was it was a warning to pay up or face further humiliation (much like – very like – the CW stuff released to the Sun). Why has there been no nuclear event? Because dropping the bomb means that the bearer of the information loses all power.

I have no doubt that there is evidence on these tapes which will condemn people in high places. Are we seriously of the belief that Whyte did not record conversations when the alleged plan to keep Sevco in the SPL was being hatched?

I think Charlotte has finally outed herself as a woman with a crowbar, carefully trying to exert some leverage. She has successfully attained some real notoriety and a pretty large audience. I ask myself, particularly as these drip-drip patterns repeat themselves, why is everyone ignoring her?

Do I trust Stuart Cosgrove and Alex Thomson – or do I buy the CtH farm?

Guess what the answer is? πŸ™‚


Mr Green and Opportunity Knocks— For Aberdeen?
Tif Finn says:

September 1, 2013 at 9:27 pm (Edit)

TSFM says:
September 1, 2013 at 9:16 pm

I am well aware of the previously released material and this is on an entirely different planet.
____________________________________________________________________________

If it was, I would agree with you. However the conflict of interest component of tonight’s nonsense is nowhere near as damning as the previously released material. It is full of implication and no direct evidence of conflict (like in the previous tapes).

It’s just tawdry – and at the very least, CtH should have considered carefully what was being released. Basic News of the Screws stuff..


Mr Green and Opportunity Knocks— For Aberdeen?
essexbeancounter says:

September 1, 2013 at 9:18 pm

TSFM says:

September 1, 2013 at 12:44 pm

……………………but mainly because erudite and articulate ex-footballers are a bit thin on the ground.
=================================================================================TSFM as always you are the epitome of discretion, but shurely you cannot be referring to such ace contributors to the β€œmeeja” as Derek Johnstone, Mark Hately, Craig Burley and a host of similar non-entities?…shame on you!…this can only be likened to pulling teeth, and without an anaesthetic…!

I deliberately exclude the meeja’s favourite β€œbookworm” Pat Nevin, who is hardly worthy of mention on account of his β€œnonentiness”.
__________________________________________________________________________-

EBC
I agree with you almost completely. Right up to the bit where you mention Nevin πŸ™‚


Recent Comments by TSFM

Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
bogsdollox says:

March 7, 2014 at 1:08 pm

Alan Price says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rangers were not the lender. The Sub-Trusts, into which Rangers made a contribution via an EBT, are the β€œlender”. Rangers gave the money away and there can be no suggestion of repayment to them.
__________________________________________________________________

Yes, but had the loans been repaid by the lendees, Rangers would have been able to apply for one themselves had they set up a sub-trust in their favour. Therefore the money would have been available to the club in times of hardship.

Or perhaps I am missing something here?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Auldheid
Res 12 is as you say important, but I am convinced that Celtic have no desire whatsoever to pursue its aims.
We could have a discussion about the possible reasons, but ultimately if DD is disinclined to seek a proper answer to these questions, then the SFA will dodge the bullet.
Thus my question to Campbellsmoney: do individual (or groups of) shareholders have locus to seek legal redress here?
Going at it in that fashion may even force Celtic and other clubs for that matter to come on board.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
I don’t know is the answer, but I doubt it. You see its not a question of law really. Its not a proper court – its a made up thing by a private body.
_________________________________________________________________

I meant a challenge in law. For example, is there a framework whereby a shareholder(s) of a club(s) could challenge the outcome?

It does seem rather odd that, if a most people here believe, RFC achieved honours dishonestly and in doing so denied other clubs prize-money and opportunity that those clubs are reluctant to seek redress.

My guess I that the must have something to lose by bringing that up – but what?

Is there a mechanism through which the SFA/SPL could be sued by individual shareholders for loss of earnings caused by a lack of proper regulation by the governing bodies.


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Campbellsmoney

Is there anyone outside of the clubs who may have locus to challenge LNS? Is there any basis for a challenge?


Scottish Football: An Honest Game, Honestly Governed?
Kicker Conspiracy

Double click or tap on the TU and it will change your vote πŸ™‚


About the author