Podcast Episode 3 – David Low

By

Auldheid says: April 25, 2014 at 3:43 pm Cone on again Auldheid, …

Comment on Podcast Episode 3 – David Low by scapaflow.

Auldheid says:
April 25, 2014 at 3:43 pm

Cone on again Auldheid, by boards, I meant the boards at the SFA and the SPFL, which I rather suspect you know.

I was not singling Celtic out, but, all the way through this we have been told Celtic can’t lead on this issue, because of the way it would be portrayed, has that attitude changed?

The fans may well rise up in fury, although I’m not sure that the technical issues around granting a licence, are as easy for non-bampots to get their heads around as the prospect of of a club being parachuted into a league.

Still time will tell, hopefully you will be correct, but I fear you’re in for a disappointment

scapaflow Also Commented

Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
Can i suggest that the board members of the SFA, SPFL, RIFC. TRFC and all employees of these august organisations immediately enroll on the OU course below. Who knows, the feckless feckwits may actually learn something :mrgreen:

http://www.open.edu/openlearn/money-management/the-business-football/content-section-overview?utm_source=OpenLearn+newsletter&utm_campaign=db5e0cb4a1-OpenLearn_newsletter_April_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_260c5edc30-db5e0cb4a1-9795969


Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
buckfastswallier says:
April 30, 2014 at 6:43 pm

Whilst my contempt for SFA boards past and present is limitless, I do recognise that at the cones and footballs level the SFA does a good job, probably in spite of the bums in the boardroom, rather than because of them :mrgreen:


Podcast Episode 3 – David Low
“Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 24s
STV understands the SPFL will take no action against Kilmarnock after finding no evidence on signature forgery claims http://bit.ly/dslPvw “


Recent Comments by scapaflow

History, Neighbours and Made Up News
Ernie

Perfectly respectable point of view. However, I suspect things like Armed Forces Day are here to stay. A lot of people in the military love their football, they do not by any means all support Rangers. So if there is going to be some sort of Armed Forces Day, then why not make it inclusive rather than exclusive?
Personally, I think the SFA saying to the military, if service personnel turn up on Cup Final Day in uniform we’ll let them in free, is a much better way for football as whole to mark an “Armed Forces Day”, rather than the perennial PR car crash waiting to happen at Ibrox.
I bet, (know) a lot of serving military types would be quietly delighted to see and an end to the purely Rangers day.
YMMV


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
BLUSEPTEMBER 19, 2016 at 14:46

ta


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
SCAPAFLOWSEPTEMBER 19, 2016 at 14:26

Tried to add:
How about the SFA holding an Armed Forces Day as part of Scottish Cup Final? A bit like the Lawn Tennis Association does at Wimbledon, thereby detoxifying the whole issue?


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
Blu

Possibly, do they use temporary seating for Forces day?


History, Neighbours and Made Up News
Problem with the stands at Ibrox you say?
“Nothing to see here” says the man on the level
What about that Section 89 Building warrant lodged with the Glasgow City council?
https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/scottishBuildingWarrantDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=ODLE5LEX09500
here’s the guidance notes for applying for a Section 89 
https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=12988&p=0

“The plans should include the type of seats (if any)which are to be used….”


About the author