The Case for a New SFA.

Avatar By

EDIT.      but it was possibly the singular and most instrumental …

Comment on The Case for a New SFA. by Corrupt official.

EDIT. 
    but it was possibly the singular and most instrumental factor in Sevco Scotland being granted membership of the SFA 
  Should read,
     Being allowed to keep membership of the SFA.

Corrupt official Also Commented

The Case for a New SFA.
“Rangers First 2014 CIC (Community Interest Company) will become the shareholding vehicle for the new group,” it reads. “Existing shareholdings will be consolidated into this vehicle and it will become the vehicle for share purchases for the ISDX listing and going forward.”
       ———————————————————————————————–
   What ISDX listing would that be?
This looks like a straight forward scam to me. The fans buy the shares, and get a wee certificate above the mantle-piece, and the Sevco board get the power of the shares, or at least control of the block vote through controlling the CIC Co board, made up of blazer chasers.
    Didn’t they have a “fan elected” voice previously, that was disbanded, and replaced by a board elected “voice”……It seems the Delorean has its dials set for Roman Ampitheatre again.
    


The Case for a New SFA.
There has been speculation where certain assets would find themselves depending on certain outcomes. One place I haven’t seen mentioned is in the hands of the crown.   
   Coupled with the cashback for communities scheme, I can definitely see some  community benefits…..Especially for Murray Park.
http://www.gov.scot/Topics/archive/law-order/organised-crime/soc/Proceedsofcrime


The Case for a New SFA.
John Clark October 21, 2015 at 12:29 am

On the step a lot are they John? 🙂


Recent Comments by Corrupt official

It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
JIMBODECEMBER 29, 2017 at 12:55
I hope the pathways in the approaches to CP are well salted tomorrow.  I read a few weeks ago that the pavements were very icy and dangerous on the way to the ground
    ——————————————————————————–
    I think it is covered in the criteria by which a match can take place Jimbo, but I imagine restricted to the actual property boundaries.


It Is Better To Offer No Excuse Than A Bad One
JIMBODECEMBER 28, 2017 at 18:17
So the SPFL have come out and said we can’t afford goal line technology.
    —————————————————————————–
    How much would a phone selotaped to the goalposts really cost?….OK the pinhole camera securely sited in the post or bar, but it shouldn’t run to mega bucks. 
    Interesting reading this past wee while. I wish you all a very happy and healthy new year. 


Who Is Conning Whom?
    Would it have been less embarrassing for the Sevco statement to merely have iterated. “Sorry, but we’re skint!”


Who Is Conning Whom?
DBD….Don’t you want to discover who killed your club and how?. (Because the simple fact you dismiss, is that Yes!..It did die !) Don’t you want to know who assisted them, have them exposed, and removed from office, or prosecuted if warranted?. Don’t you want rules, and governance to prevent it happening again?
   No need for a glass door to see some folk coming.


Who Is Conning Whom?
   I hear Sevco will be sending out a strong message at the AGM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR0lOtdvqyg


About the author

Avatar