Why We Need to Change

By

I’ve just seen the first part of JW’s exclusive. I …

Comment on Why We Need to Change by Jingso.Jimsie.

I’ve just seen the first part of JW’s exclusive. I hope Level5 paid Sky’s bill.

Is there a “fawning guff” emoticon? There should be!

Jingso.Jimsie Also Commented

Why We Need to Change
Thanks easyJambo.


Why We Need to Change
easyJambo says:
Member: (730 comments)
August 20, 2015 at 6:15 pm
The Sports Direct Annual Report has been issued.

http://www.sportsdirectplc.com/~/media/Files/S/Sports-Direct/annual-report/Annual%20Report%202015%20-%20FINAL.pdf

It details that SD sales to Rangers Retail Ltd for 2014/15 were £3.834M. In 2013/14 the figure was £3.843M. That is just £9,000 down. So, in spite of the boycott, sales held up at the previous year’s levels.
==============================================

I’m no accountant but if there is a buy back clause for unsold goods, then that indicates that almost the same value of stock was ordered in the boycott year of 2014/15 as was in 2013/14. The question is who bought it? Fans or RIFC/TRFC?

Happy to be corrected if wrong, of course.


Why We Need to Change
Re Michael Stewart:

I believe he has political aspirations. I also think he’s a shrewd cookie.

He surely wouldn’t be naive enough to go on record about the reality of the “continuity myth” on a blog/podcast that wouldn’t give him anything positive in the wider constituency, but could well be used negatively against him in the future?

If he carried out any research, he’d be asking for the list of topics in advance & then stating what he will & will not talk about. Still, it could give his interrogator the chance to do a Paxo & ask the same question more than twelve times!


Recent Comments by Jingso.Jimsie

THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
UPTHEHOOPS

MAY 3, 2017 at 07:20        

Just watching a clip from Sky Sports where Davie Provan was asked what would it take for Rangers to close the gap on Celtic. “Hard cash”, was his answer, but no insight as to where it will come from. Just like Walter Smith, Ally McCoist, Willie Henderson etc.

I wonder why people are scared to point out Rangers were never really rich, that they just had a very friendly bank, then adopted very dodgy tax avoidance practices…
——————————————————-

I suspect the only time that any form of Rangers had ‘hard cash’ in the last thirty years was in the immediate aftermath of Chuck’s IPO.

I wonder what happened to it?


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I noticed a link to this article elsewhere & I think it’s worth sharing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/sports/soccer/cybernetics-cesarean-sections-and-soccers-most-magnificent-mind.html?ref=oembed&_r=0


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
HOMUNCULUS

MAY 1, 2017 at 10:50        
One can often gauge what the current popular view is by reading the scribblings in the daily record. In particular those of Keith Jackson…
———————————————————-

You have to remember that the Monday morning ‘Keich By Keith’ is an ‘opinion’ piece, rather than reportage.

His opinion, going by today’s column, is rather confused.


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
I read Ewen Murray’s report last evening. It’s a decent piece, particularly when compared to BBC Scotland’s on-line match report. However, like many, he’s in denial or ignorance about the songbook. The BTL comments are worth reading as well.


THAT Debate, and the Beauty of Hindsight
Thanks to those who replied to my query of 1704 yesterday.

Without prejudice, I’ll just leave this here.

I’m sure the majority of readers can work out what I mean.


About the author